On the Pitfalls of Untested Common-Factor Restrictions: The Case of the Inverted Fisher Hypothesis
The dangers of incorrectly imposing common-factor restrictions through the use o f the Cochrane-Orcutt transformation are illustrated using J. Carmich ael and P. Stebbing's (1983) analysis of the inverted Fisher hypothes is. Empirical evidence that the nominal rate of interest is unrelated to the rate of inflation is examined and found to be the result of a n invalid common-factor restriction. A better-specified model indicat es a direct, though not one-for-one, relationship. Copyright 1988 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Volume (Year): 50 (1988)
Issue (Month): 2 (May)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0305-9049
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/subs.asp?ref=0305-9049|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:obuest:v:50:y:1988:i:2:p:125-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.