IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v63y2014i2p211-237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Handling initial conditions and endogenous covariates in dynamic/transition models for binary data with unobserved heterogeneity

Author

Listed:
  • Anders Skrondal
  • Sophia Rabe-Hesketh

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="rssc12023-abs-0001"> Distinguishing between longitudinal dependence due to the effects of previous responses on subsequent responses and dependence due to unobserved heterogeneity is important in many disciplines. For example, wheezing is an inflammatory reaction that may ‘remodel’ a child's airway structure and thereby affect the probability of future wheezing (state dependence). Alternatively, children could vary in their susceptibilities because of unobserved covariates such as genes (unobserved heterogeneity). For binary responses, distinguishing between state dependence and unobserved heterogeneity is typically accomplished by using dynamic/transition models that include both a lagged response and a random intercept. Naive maximum likelihood estimators can be severely inconsistent because of two kinds of endogeneity problem: lack of independence of the initial response and the random intercept (the initial conditions problem) and lack of independence of the covariates and the random intercept (the endogenous covariates problem). We clarify and unify previous work on handling these problems in the disconnected literatures of statistics and econometrics, suggest improved methods, investigate the asymptotic performance of competing methods and provide practical recommendations. The recommended methods are applied to longitudinal data on children's wheezing, where we investigate the extent of state dependence and unobserved heterogeneity and whether there is an effect of maternal smoking.

Suggested Citation

  • Anders Skrondal & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2014. "Handling initial conditions and endogenous covariates in dynamic/transition models for binary data with unobserved heterogeneity," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(2), pages 211-237, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:63:y:2014:i:2:p:211-237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/rssc.2014.63.issue-2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesco Bartolucci & Valentina Nigro, 2010. "A Dynamic Model for Binary Panel Data With Unobserved Heterogeneity Admitting a √n-Consistent Conditional Estimator," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 78(2), pages 719-733, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lionel WILNER, 2019. "The Dynamics of Individual Happiness," Working Papers 2019-18, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    2. Soyoon Weon & David W. Rothwell, 2020. "Dynamics of Asset Poverty in South Korea," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 639-657, July.
    3. Franco Peracchi & Claudio Rossetti, 2022. "A nonlinear dynamic factor model of health and medical treatment," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(6), pages 1046-1066, June.
    4. Francesco Bartolucci & Claudia Pigini, 2018. "Partial effects estimation for fixed-effects logit panel data models," Working Papers 431, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    5. Johannes S. Kunz & Kevin E. Staub & Rainer Winkelmann, 2021. "Predicting individual effects in fixed effects panel probit models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(3), pages 1109-1145, July.
    6. Marco Cosconati & Alessandro Sembenelli, 2016. "Firm Subsidies and the Innovation Output: What Can We Learn by Looking at Multiple Investment Inputs?," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 2(1), pages 31-55, March.
    7. Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti & Claudia Pigini, 2020. "Choice of solutions to the initial-conditions problem in dynamic panel probit models," Working Papers 2020:27, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    8. Roy-Chowdhury, V., 2022. "Self-Confidence and Motivated Memory Loss: Evidence from Schools," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2213, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    9. Bartolucci, Francesco & Pigini, Claudia & Valentini, Francesco, 2023. "Testing for state dependence in the fixed-effects ordered logit model," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    10. Miriam Beblo & Sven Schreiber, 2022. "Leisure and housing consumption after retirement: new evidence on the life-cycle hypothesis," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 305-330, March.
    11. Giulia Bettin & Riccardo Lucchetti, 2016. "Steady streams and sudden bursts: persistence patterns in remittance decisions," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 29(1), pages 263-292, January.
    12. Majid M. Al-Sadoon & Tong Li & M. Hashem Pesaran, 2017. "Exponential class of dynamic binary choice panel data models with fixed effects," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(6-9), pages 898-927, October.
    13. Sun-Joo Cho & Sarah Brown-Schmidt & Paul De Boeck & Jianhong Shen, 2020. "Modeling Intensive Polytomous Time-Series Eye-Tracking Data: A Dynamic Tree-Based Item Response Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(1), pages 154-184, March.
    14. Konstantin A. Kholodilin & Claus Michelsen, 2019. "Zehn Jahre nach dem großen Knall: wie ist es um die Stabilität der internationalen Immobilienmärkte bestellt? [Ten years after a Big Bang: How stable are the international housing markets?]," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 5(1), pages 67-87, November.
    15. Pauline Givord & Lionel Wilner, 2015. "When Does the Stepping‐Stone Work? Fixed‐Term Contracts Versus Temporary Agency Work in Changing Economic Conditions," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 787-805, August.
    16. Francesco Bartolucci & Claudia Pigini, 2017. "Granger causality in dynamic binary short panel data models," Working Papers 421, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    17. Hugo Kruiniger, 2021. "Root-n-consistent Conditional ML estimation of dynamic panel logit models with fixed effects," Papers 2103.04973, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2021.
    18. Bartolucci, Francesco & Nigro, Valentina, 2012. "Pseudo conditional maximum likelihood estimation of the dynamic logit model for binary panel data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 170(1), pages 102-116.
    19. Francesco Bartolucci & Claudia Pigini & Francesco Valentini, 2023. "Conditional inference and bias reduction for partial effects estimation of fixed-effects logit models," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(5), pages 2257-2290, May.
    20. Bartolucci, Francesco & Pigini, Claudia, 2017. "cquad: An R and Stata Package for Conditional Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Dynamic Binary Panel Data Models," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 78(i07).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:63:y:2014:i:2:p:211-237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.