IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssb/v72y2010i2p193-217.html

Likelihood for statistically equivalent models

Author

Listed:
  • John Copas
  • Shinto Eguchi

Abstract

Summary. In likelihood inference we usually assume that the model is fixed and then base inference on the corresponding likelihood function. Often, however, the choice of model is rather arbitrary, and there may be other models which fit the data equally well. We study robustness of likelihood inference over such ‘statistically equivalent’ models and suggest a simple ‘envelope likelihood’ to capture this aspect of model uncertainty. Robustness depends critically on how we specify the parameter of interest. Some asymptotic theory is presented, illustrated by three examples.

Suggested Citation

  • John Copas & Shinto Eguchi, 2010. "Likelihood for statistically equivalent models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(2), pages 193-217, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:72:y:2010:i:2:p:193-217
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2009.00732.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2009.00732.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2009.00732.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Masayuki Henmi & Shinto Eguchi, 2004. "A paradox concerning nuisance parameters and projected estimating functions," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 91(4), pages 929-941, December.
    2. Paul Gustafson, 2001. "On measuring sensitivity to parametric model misspecification," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(1), pages 81-94.
    3. Richard Royall & Tsung‐Shan Tsou, 2003. "Interpreting statistical evidence by using imperfect models: robust adjusted likelihood functions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(2), pages 391-404, May.
    4. John Copas & Shinto Eguchi, 2005. "Local model uncertainty and incomplete‐data bias (with discussion)," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(4), pages 459-513, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Masataka Taguri, 2022. "Discussion of “Akaike Memorial Lecture 2020: Some of the challenges of statistical applications”," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 74(4), pages 643-647, August.
    2. John Copas, 2022. "Akaike Memorial Lecture 2020: Some of the challenges of statistical applications," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 74(4), pages 615-637, August.
    3. Jim Smith & Fabio Rigat, 2012. "Isoseparation and robustness in parametric Bayesian inference," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 64(3), pages 495-519, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoyan Shi & Hongtu Zhu & Joseph G. Ibrahim, 2009. "Local Influence for Generalized Linear Models with Missing Covariates," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 1164-1174, December.
    2. Heng Chen & Daniel F. Heitjan, 2022. "Analysis of local sensitivity to nonignorability with missing outcomes and predictors," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 1342-1352, December.
    3. Masahiro Kato & Masatoshi Uehara & Shota Yasui, 2020. "Off-Policy Evaluation and Learning for External Validity under a Covariate Shift," Papers 2002.11642, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2020.
    4. Tsung-Shan Tsou, 2011. "Likelihood inferences for the link function without knowing the true underlying distributions," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 507-519, September.
    5. Olli Saarela & David A. Stephens & Erica E. M. Moodie & Marina B. Klein, 2015. "On Bayesian estimation of marginal structural models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(2), pages 279-288, June.
    6. Luo, Yu & Graham, Daniel J. & McCoy, Emma J., 2023. "Semiparametric Bayesian doubly robust causal estimation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117944, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Smith, Simon C. & Timmermann, Allan & Zhu, Yinchu, 2019. "Variable selection in panel models with breaks," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 323-344.
    8. Xavier de Luna & Mathias Lundin, 2014. "Sensitivity analysis of the unconfoundedness assumption with an application to an evaluation of college choice effects on earnings," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(8), pages 1767-1784, August.
    9. Zhiwei Zhang, 2010. "Profile Likelihood and Incomplete Data," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 78(1), pages 102-116, April.
    10. Huang, Xianzheng, 2011. "Detecting random-effects model misspecification via coarsened data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 703-714, January.
    11. Yihui He & Fang Han, 2023. "On propensity score matching with a diverging number of matches," Papers 2310.14142, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    12. George Karabatsos, 2023. "Approximate Bayesian computation using asymptotically normal point estimates," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 531-568, June.
    13. Tsung-Shan Tsou, 2005. "Inferences of variance function - a parametric robust way," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(8), pages 785-796.
    14. Prokhorov, Artem & Schmidt, Peter, 2009. "GMM redundancy results for general missing data problems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 151(1), pages 47-55, July.
    15. Li-Chu Chien, 2011. "A robust diagnostic plot for explanatory variables under model mis-specification," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 113-126.
    16. Li-Pang Chen & Grace Y. Yi, 2021. "Semiparametric methods for left-truncated and right-censored survival data with covariate measurement error," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 73(3), pages 481-517, June.
    17. S. Eftekhari Mahabadi & M. Ganjali, 2012. "An index of local sensitivity to non-ignorability for parametric survival models with potential non-random missing covariate: an application to the SEER cancer registry data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(11), pages 2327-2348, July.
    18. Jiming Jiang & Thuan Nguyen & J. Sunil Rao, 2015. "The E-MS Algorithm: Model Selection With Incomplete Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(511), pages 1136-1147, September.
    19. Shen, Chung-Wei & Tsou, Tsung-Shan & Balakrishnan, N., 2011. "Robust likelihood inference for regression parameters in partially linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 1696-1714, April.
    20. Juxin Liu & Paul Gustafson, 2012. "On the detectability of different forms of interaction in regression models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 75(3), pages 347-365, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:72:y:2010:i:2:p:193-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.