IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssb/v70y2008i5p1049-1066.html

Estimation of controlled direct effects

Author

Listed:
  • Sylvie Goetgeluk
  • Stijn Vansteelandt
  • Els Goetghebeur

Abstract

Summary. When regression models adjust for mediators on the causal path from exposure to outcome, the regression coefficient of exposure is commonly viewed as a measure of the direct exposure effect. This interpretation can be misleading, even with a randomly assigned exposure. This is because adjustment for post‐exposure measurements introduces bias whenever their association with the outcome is confounded by more than just the exposure. By the same token, adjustment for such confounders stays problematic when these are themselves affected by the exposure. Robins accommodated this by introducing linear structural nested direct effect models with direct effect parameters that can be estimated by using inverse probability weighting by a conditional distribution of the mediator. The resulting estimators are consistent, but inefficient, and can be extremely unstable when the mediator is absolutely continuous. We develop direct effect estimators which are not only more efficient but also consistent under a less demanding model for a conditional expectation of the outcome. We find that the one estimator which avoids inverse probability weighting altogether performs best. This estimator is intuitive, computationally straightforward and, as demonstrated by simulation, competes extremely well with ordinary least squares estimators in settings where standard regression is valid.

Suggested Citation

  • Sylvie Goetgeluk & Stijn Vansteelandt & Els Goetghebeur, 2008. "Estimation of controlled direct effects," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(5), pages 1049-1066, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:70:y:2008:i:5:p:1049-1066
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00673.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00673.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00673.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Constantine E. Frangakis & Donald B. Rubin & Ming-Wen An & Ellen MacKenzie, 2007. "Principal Stratification Designs to Estimate Input Data Missing Due to Death," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(3), pages 641-649, September.
    2. Tan, Zhiqiang, 2006. "A Distributional Approach for Causal Inference Using Propensity Scores," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1619-1637, December.
    3. Constantine E. Frangakis & Donald B. Rubin, 2002. "Principal Stratification in Causal Inference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(1), pages 21-29, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karel Vermeulen & Stijn Vansteelandt, 2015. "Bias-Reduced Doubly Robust Estimation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(511), pages 1024-1036, September.
    2. Yang Ni & Peter Müller & Yitan Zhu & Yuan Ji, 2018. "Heterogeneous reciprocal graphical models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 606-615, June.
    3. Matthew Blackwell & Anton Strezhnev, 2022. "Telescope matching for reducing model dependence in the estimation of the effects of time‐varying treatments: An application to negative advertising," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(1), pages 377-399, January.
    4. Wouter Talloen & Beatrijs Moerkerke & Tom Loeys & Jessie De Naeghel & Hilde Van Keer & Stijn Vansteelandt, 2016. "Estimation of Indirect Effects in the Presence of Unmeasured Confounding for the Mediator–Outcome Relationship in a Multilevel 2-1-1 Mediation Model," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 41(4), pages 359-391, August.
    5. Samuel D. Lendle & Meenakshi S. Subbaraman & Mark J. van der Laan, 2013. "Identification and Efficient Estimation of the Natural Direct Effect among the Untreated," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 310-317, June.
    6. Kiwoong Park, 2021. "Does Relative Deprivation in School During Adolescence Get Under the Skin? A Causal Mediation Analysis from the Life Course Perspective," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 285-312, February.
    7. Tyler J. VanderWeele & Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen, 2017. "Mediation analysis with time varying exposures and mediators," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(3), pages 917-938, June.
    8. Aleksey Oshchepkov & Anna Shirokanova, 2020. "Multilevel Modeling For Economists: Why, When And How," HSE Working papers WP BRP 233/EC/2020, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    9. Haoyu Wei & Hengrui Cai & Chengchun Shi & Rui Song, 2024. "On Efficient Inference of Causal Effects with Multiple Mediators," Papers 2401.05517, arXiv.org.
    10. Yizhen Xu & Numair Sani & AmirEmad Ghassami & Ilya Shpitser, 2021. "Multiply Robust Causal Mediation Analysis with Continuous Treatments," Papers 2105.09254, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. VanderWeele Tyler J, 2011. "Principal Stratification -- Uses and Limitations," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Chiba Yasutaka, 2012. "The Large Sample Bounds on the Principal Strata Effect with Application to a Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, May.
    3. VanderWeele, Tyler J., 2008. "Simple relations between principal stratification and direct and indirect effects," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(17), pages 2957-2962, December.
    4. Atanu Bhattacharjee, 2020. "Estimation of Treatment Effect with Missing Observations for Three Arms and Three Periods Crossover Clinical Trials," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 447-460, September.
    5. Alessandra Mattei & Fabrizia Mealli & Barbara Pacini, 2014. "Identification of causal effects in the presence of nonignorable missing outcome values," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(2), pages 278-288, June.
    6. Pearl Judea, 2011. "Principal Stratification -- a Goal or a Tool?," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, March.
    7. Maria Josefsson & Michael J. Daniels, 2021. "Bayesian semi‐parametric G‐computation for causal inference in a cohort study with MNAR dropout and death," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(2), pages 398-414, March.
    8. Anna M. Wilke & Donald P. Green & Jasper Cooper, 2020. "A placebo design to detect spillovers from an education–entertainment experiment in Uganda," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(3), pages 1075-1096, June.
    9. Linbo Wang & Thomas S. Richardson & Xiao-Hua Zhou, 2017. "Causal analysis of ordinal treatments and binary outcomes under truncation by death," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(3), pages 719-735, June.
    10. Bryan E. Shepherd & Peter B. Gilbert & Charles T. Dupont, 2011. "Sensitivity Analyses Comparing Time-to-Event Outcomes Only Existing in a Subset Selected Postrandomization and Relaxing Monotonicity," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(3), pages 1100-1110, September.
    11. Michael R. Elliott & Anna Conlon & Yun Li, 2013. "Discussion on “Surrogate Measures and Consistent Surrogates”," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(3), pages 565-569, September.
    12. Bubb, Ryan & Kaufman, Alex, 2014. "Securitization and moral hazard: Evidence from credit score cutoff rules," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-18.
    13. German Blanco & Carlos A. Flores & Alfonso Flores-Lagunes, 2013. "Bounds on Average and Quantile Treatment Effects of Job Corps Training on Wages," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 48(3), pages 659-701.
    14. Jincheng Zhou & James S. Hodges & Haitao Chu, 2020. "Rejoinder to “CACE and meta‐analysis (letter to the editor)” by Stuart Baker," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 1385-1389, December.
    15. Jennifer Hill & Jane Waldfogel & Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, 2002. "Differential effects of high-quality child care," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(4), pages 601-627.
    16. Giovanni Mellace & Roberto Rocci, 2011. "Principal Stratification in sample selection problems with non normal error terms," CEIS Research Paper 194, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 02 May 2011.
    17. Hongseok Namkoong & Yuanzhe Ma & Peter W. Glynn, 2026. "Minimax Optimal Estimation of Stability Under Distribution Shift," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 74(1), pages 464-483, January.
    18. Martin Huber & Sarina Joy Oberhansli, 2026. "Difference-in-differences for mediation analysis using double machine learning," Papers 2602.23877, arXiv.org.
    19. Michael E. Sobel & Bengt Muthén, 2012. "Compliance Mixture Modelling with a Zero-Effect Complier Class and Missing Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 1037-1045, December.
    20. Legge, Stefan & Schmid, Lukas, 2013. "Rankings, Random Successes, and Individual Performance," Economics Working Paper Series 1340, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:70:y:2008:i:5:p:1049-1066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.