IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v72y2021i10p1272-1284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Everyone everywhere: A distributed and embedded paradigm for usability

Author

Listed:
  • Michael B. Twidale
  • David M. Nichols
  • Christopher P. Lueg

Abstract

We present a new paradigm to address the persistence of difficulties that people have in accessing and using information. Our idea consists of two main aspects: engaging wider society with usability and distributing the topic across disciplines. We claim that bad usability is a social justice issue. Primarily, we propose that usability should become the subject of widespread activism across society, enabling more people to realize that their usability problems are not due to inadequacies in themselves but in current designs. People should be encouraged and enabled to complain about their experiences with an expectation of improvements. We also propose that the current restriction of this topic to certain disciplinary units is overly narrow and that instead there should be radical embedding of usability concepts across many different fields and settings. We believe that the usability of information systems is core to information science and that information scientists should resume their historic role as heralds and pioneers of human–computer interaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael B. Twidale & David M. Nichols & Christopher P. Lueg, 2021. "Everyone everywhere: A distributed and embedded paradigm for usability," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(10), pages 1272-1284, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:72:y:2021:i:10:p:1272-1284
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24465
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24465?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Simmons & Carol Brennan, 2017. "User voice and complaints as drivers of innovation in public services," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(8), pages 1085-1104, September.
    2. Certomà, Chiara & Corsini, Filippo & Frey, Marco, 2020. "Hyperconnected, receptive and do-it-yourself city. An investigation into the European “imaginary” of crowdsourcing for urban governance," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    3. Marcia J. Bates, 1999. "The invisible substrate of information science," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 50(12), pages 1043-1050.
    4. H. Borko, 1968. "Information science: What is it?," American Documentation, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 3-5, January.
    5. Christine L. Borgman, 1996. "Why are online catalogs still hard to use?," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 47(7), pages 493-503, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bryce Clayton Newell, 2023. "Surveillance as information practice," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(4), pages 444-460, April.
    2. Bentivoglio, Deborah & Bucci, Giorgia & Belletti, Matteo & Finco, Adele, 2022. "A theoretical framework on network’s dynamics for precision agriculture technologies adoption," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 60(4), January.
    3. Daniel Carter & Amelia Acker & Dan Sholler, 2021. "Investigative approaches to researching information technology companies," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(6), pages 655-666, June.
    4. Marcia J. Bates, 2021. "Search foundations: Toward a science of technology‐mediated experience. Sachi Arafat and Elham Ashoori. Boston, MA: MIT Press, 2019. 448, pp. $65.00 (hardback). (ISBN 9780262038591)," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(3), pages 377-383, March.
    5. Linda C. Smith, 2024. "Reviews and Reviewing: Approaches to Research Synthesis. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(3), pages 245-267, March.
    6. Bratianu Constantin & Bejinaru Ruxandra, 2025. "Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Artificial Knowledge in the Knowledge Management Systems," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 3171-3179.
    7. Jackson Emerson Abraham, 2015. "Role of Information Science in Sustainable Development: Sierra Leone as a Case Study," Management of Sustainable Development, Sciendo, vol. 7(2), pages 23-29, December.
    8. Yang, Yang & Zou, Mingyang, 2025. "Contagion of corporate misconduct in the supply chain: Evidence from customers and suppliers in China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    9. Jenny Bossaller & Anthony J. Million, 2023. "The research data life cycle, legacy data, and dilemmas in research data management," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(6), pages 701-706, June.
    10. Grabowska Marta, 2019. "Library and Information Science Vis-À-Vis Web Science in the Light of the OECD Fields of Science and Technology Classification," International Journal of Advanced Statistics and IT&C for Economics and Life Sciences, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, June.
    11. Stephann Makri, 2020. "Information informing design: Information Science research with implications for the design of digital information environments," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(11), pages 1402-1412, November.
    12. Rong Tang & Bharat Mehra & Jia Tina Du & Yuxiang (Chris) Zhao, 2021. "Framing a discussion on paradigm shift(s) in the field of information," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(2), pages 253-258, February.
    13. Jinxuan Ma & Brady Lund, 2021. "The evolution and shift of research topics and methods in library and information science," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(8), pages 1059-1074, August.
    14. Isto Huvila & Heidi Enwald & Kristina Eriksson‐Backa & Ying‐Hsang Liu & Noora Hirvonen, 2022. "Information behavior and practices research informing information systems design," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(7), pages 1043-1057, July.
    15. Tami Oliphant, 2021. "Emerging (information) realities and epistemic injustice," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(8), pages 951-962, August.
    16. Sylvain K Cibangu, 2018. "Misunderstandings of Capability Approach: Towards Paradigm Pluralism," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 9(2), pages 54-72.
    17. Staša Milojević & Cassidy R. Sugimoto & Erjia Yan & Ying Ding, 2011. "The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science: Analysis of article title words," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(10), pages 1933-1953, October.
    18. Yan Zhang & Jiaying Liu & Shijie Song, 2023. "The design and evaluation of a nudge‐based interface to facilitate consumers' evaluation of online health information credibility," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(7), pages 828-845, July.
    19. Kebede, Gashaw, 2010. "Knowledge management: An information science perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 416-424.
    20. Carvajal Bermúdez, Juan Carlos & König, Reinhard, 2021. "The role of technologies and citizen organizations in decentralized forms of participation. A case study about residential streets in Vienna," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:72:y:2021:i:10:p:1272-1284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.