IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v75y2024i3p245-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reviews and Reviewing: Approaches to Research Synthesis. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper

Author

Listed:
  • Linda C. Smith

Abstract

Reviews have long been recognized as among the most important forms of scientific communication. The rapid growth of the primary literature has further increased the need for reviews to distill and interpret the literature. This review on Reviews and Reviewing: Approaches to Research Synthesis encompasses the evolution of the review literature, taxonomy of review literature, uses and users of reviews, the process of preparing reviews, assessment of review quality and impact, the impact of information technology on the preparation of reviews, and research opportunities for information science related to reviews and reviewing. In addition to providing a synthesis of prior research, this review seeks to identify gaps in the published research and to suggest possible future research directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda C. Smith, 2024. "Reviews and Reviewing: Approaches to Research Synthesis. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(3), pages 245-267, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:75:y:2024:i:3:p:245-267
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24851
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24851?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christoffer Bruun Korfitsen & Marie-Louise Kirkegaard Mikkelsen & Anja Ussing & Karen Christina Walker & Jeanett Friis Rohde & Henning Keinke Andersen & Simon Tarp & Mina Nicole Händel, 2022. "Usefulness of Cochrane Reviews in Clinical Guideline Development—A Survey of 585 Recommendations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-10, January.
    2. Laura Sheble, 2016. "Research synthesis methods and library and information science: Shared problems, limited diffusion," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(8), pages 1990-2008, August.
    3. Rowena Weiss Swanson, 1976. "A Work Study of the Review Production Process," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 27(1), pages 70-72, January.
    4. Julian Elliott & Rebecca Lawrence & Jan C. Minx & Olufemi T. Oladapo & Philippe Ravaud & Britta Tendal Jeppesen & James Thomas & Tari Turner & Per Olav Vandvik & Jeremy M. Grimshaw, 2021. "Decision makers need constantly updated evidence synthesis," Nature, Nature, vol. 600(7889), pages 383-385, December.
    5. Chris Tyler & K. L. Akerlof & Alessandro Allegra & Zachary Arnold & Henriette Canino & Marius A. Doornenbal & Josh A. Goldstein & David Budtz Pedersen & William J. Sutherland, 2023. "AI tools as science policy advisers? The potential and the pitfalls," Nature, Nature, vol. 622(7981), pages 27-30, October.
    6. Wagner, Gerit & Prester, Julian & Roche, Maria & Schryen, Guido & Benlian, Alexander & Paré, Guy & Templier, Mathieu, 2021. "Which factors affect the scientific impact of review papers in IS research? A scientometric study," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 125255, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    7. Clemens Blümel & Alexander Schniedermann, 2020. "Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: a research agenda," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 711-728, July.
    8. Christian Lachance & Steve Poirier & Vincent Larivière, 2014. "The kiss of death? The effect of being cited in a review on subsequent citations," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 65(7), pages 1501-1505, July.
    9. Julian H Elliott & Tari Turner & Ornella Clavisi & James Thomas & Julian P T Higgins & Chris Mavergames & Russell L Gruen, 2014. "Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-6, February.
    10. Cecelia Brown, 2004. "The Matthew Effect of the Annual Reviews series and the flow of scientific communication through the World Wide Web," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 60(1), pages 25-30, May.
    11. Carlos A. Cuadra, 1964. "Identifying key contributions to information science," American Documentation, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(4), pages 289-295, October.
    12. Lei Lei & Yunmei Sun, 2020. "Should highly cited items be excluded in impact factor calculation? The effect of review articles on journal impact factor," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(3), pages 1697-1706, March.
    13. Bodil Hoffmeyer & Siv Fonnes & Kristoffer Andresen & Jacob Rosenberg, 2023. "Use of inactive Cochrane reviews in academia: A citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(5), pages 2923-2934, May.
    14. Mathieu Templier & Guy Paré, 2018. "Transparency in literature reviews: an assessment of reporting practices across review types and genres in top IS journals," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 503-550, September.
    15. Marcia J. Bates, 1999. "The invisible substrate of information science," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 50(12), pages 1043-1050.
    16. Miranda, Ruben & Garcia-Carpintero, Esther, 2018. "Overcitation and overrepresentation of review papers in the most cited papers," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 1015-1030.
    17. Christopher W. Belter, 2016. "Citation analysis as a literature search method for systematic reviews," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(11), pages 2766-2777, November.
    18. Anthony M. Woodward, 1977. "The roles of reviews in information transfer," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 28(3), pages 175-180, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sánchez-Pérez, Manuel & Marín-Carrillo, María Belén & Segovia-López, Cristina & Terán-Yépez, Eduardo, 2025. "Bibliometric articles in business and management: Factors affecting production and scholarly impact," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    2. Clemens Blümel & Alexander Schniedermann, 2020. "Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: a research agenda," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 711-728, July.
    3. Marko Orošnjak & Branko Štrbac & Srđan Vulanović & Biserka Runje & Amalija Horvatić Novak & Andrej Razumić, 2024. "RCE (rationale–cogency–extent) criterion unravels features affecting citation impact of top-ranked systematic literature reviews: leaving the impression…is all you need," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(3), pages 1891-1947, March.
    4. Alexander Schniedermann, 2021. "A comparison of systematic reviews and guideline-based systematic reviews in medical studies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(12), pages 9829-9846, December.
    5. Kayvan Kousha & Mike Thelwall, 2024. "Factors associating with or predicting more cited or higher quality journal articles: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(3), pages 215-244, March.
    6. Petr Praus, 2023. "Empirical relationship between the number of review and research articles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(4), pages 2201-2209, April.
    7. Fiona Campbell & Ruth Wong & Jennifer L. Llewellyen & Akvile Stoniute & Fiona Pearson & Melissa Bond, 2024. "PROTOCOL: Methods used in the development, production and updating of evidence and gap maps: A scoping review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), June.
    8. Yves Fassin, 2021. "The impact of review articles in management and economics journal rankings and metrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(12), pages 9623-9632, December.
    9. Salim Moussa, 2021. "Are FT50 journals really leading? A comment on Fassin," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(12), pages 9613-9622, December.
    10. Tian-Yuan Huang & Liying Yang, 2022. "Superior identification index: Quantifying the capability of academic journals to recognize good research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(7), pages 4023-4043, July.
    11. Gillian L Currie & Helena N Angel-Scott & Lesley Colvin & Fala Cramond & Kaitlyn Hair & Laila Khandoker & Jing Liao & Malcolm Macleod & Sarah K McCann & Rosie Morland & Nicki Sherratt & Robert Stewart, 2019. "Animal models of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A machine-assisted systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-34, May.
    12. Thorsten Schoormann & Julia Schweihoff & Ilka Jussen & Frederik Möller, 2023. "Classification tools for business models: Status quo, comparison, and agenda," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-36, December.
    13. Brady Lund, 2019. "Examination of correlates of H-index as a measure of research productivity for library and information science faculty in the United States and Canada," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(2), pages 897-915, August.
    14. Bentivoglio, Deborah & Bucci, Giorgia & Belletti, Matteo & Finco, Adele, 2022. "A theoretical framework on network’s dynamics for precision agriculture technologies adoption," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 60(4), January.
    15. Marion Schmidt & Wolfgang Kircheis & Arno Simons & Martin Potthast & Benno Stein, 2023. "A diachronic perspective on citation latency in Wikipedia articles on CRISPR/Cas-9: an exploratory case study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(6), pages 3649-3673, June.
    16. Dana Rotman & Kezia Procita & Derek Hansen & Cynthia Sims Parr & Jennifer Preece, 2012. "Supporting content curation communities: The case of the Encyclopedia of Life," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(6), pages 1092-1107, June.
    17. Miranda, Ruben & Garcia-Carpintero, Esther, 2018. "Overcitation and overrepresentation of review papers in the most cited papers," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 1015-1030.
    18. Sylvain K Cibangu, 2018. "Misunderstandings of Capability Approach: Towards Paradigm Pluralism," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 9(2), pages 54-72.
    19. Judit Sulyok & Beáta Fehérvölgyi & Tibor Csizmadia & Attila I. Katona & Zsolt T. Kosztyán, 2023. "Does geography matter? Implications for future tourism research in light of COVID-19," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(3), pages 1601-1637, March.
    20. Staša Milojević & Cassidy R. Sugimoto & Erjia Yan & Ying Ding, 2011. "The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science: Analysis of article title words," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(10), pages 1933-1953, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:75:y:2024:i:3:p:245-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.