IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v64y2026i3p1190-1203.html

Norm Contestation in EU Foreign Policy: The Case of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights

Author

Listed:
  • Diego Badell

Abstract

The EU considers gender equality fundamental to its identity, with Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) playing a crucial role. This article delves into the contested aspects of EU foreign policy concerning SRHR from 1997 to 2021. Through document analysis and 18 semi‐structured interviews, it discerns three phases of contestation. Between 1997 and 2017, contestation was institutionalised within the EU, and the norm was reinforced. However, from 2017 to 2020, validity contestation arose as Hungary, Poland and the United States formed an alliance opposing SRHR, resulting in their symbolic exclusion from the EU's normative community. In 2021, within a less polarised international context (with the United States returning to consensus on SRHR), Hungary and Poland reaffirmed their commitment to the EU's SRHR consensus, highlighting the resilience of the norm.

Suggested Citation

  • Diego Badell, 2026. "Norm Contestation in EU Foreign Policy: The Case of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 1190-1203, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:64:y:2026:i:3:p:1190-1203
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13622
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13622?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Checkel, Jeffrey T., 2005. "International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(4), pages 801-826, October.
    2. Maurizio Carbone, 2019. "The Calm after the Storm: Plurilateral Challenges to the Post‐2020 EU–ACP Partnership," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(S1), pages 141-151, September.
    3. Valentine Berthet, 2022. "United in Crisis: Abortion Politics in the European Parliament and Political Groups' Disputes over EU Values," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1797-1814, November.
    4. Anne Jenichen, 2022. "The Politics of Normative Power Europe: Norm Entrepreneurs and Contestation in the Making of EU External Human Rights Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(5), pages 1299-1315, September.
    5. Heather Macrae, 2010. "The EU as a Gender Equal Polity: Myths and Realities," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 155-174, January.
    6. Marella Bodur Ün & Harun Arıkan, 2022. "Europeanization and De‐Europeanization of Turkey's Gender Equality Policy: The Case of the Istanbul Convention," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 945-962, July.
    7. Checkel, Jeffrey T., 2001. "Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55(3), pages 553-588, July.
    8. Ian Manners, 2002. "Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 235-258, June.
    9. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:155-174 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Hooghe, Liesbet & Marks, Gary, 2009. "A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(1), pages 1-23, January.
    11. Wolfgang Wagner, 2017. "Liberal Power Europe," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(6), pages 1398-1414, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. May-Britt Stumbaum, 2015. "The diffusion of norms in security-related fields: views from China, India and the EU," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 331-347, September.
    2. Tanja A. Börzel & Thomas Risse, 2009. "Diffusing (Inter-) Regionalism - The EU as a Model of Regional Integration," KFG Working Papers p0007, Free University Berlin.
    3. Monika Bauhr & Nicholas Charron, 2024. "Europe around the corner? How border proximity and quality of government explains European identity," European Union Politics, , vol. 25(2), pages 376-395, June.
    4. Tanja A. Börzel, 2011. "Comparative Regionalism - A New Research Agenda," KFG Working Papers p0028, Free University Berlin.
    5. Luuk Middelaar, 2016. "The Return of Politics – The European Union after the crises in the eurozone and Ukraine," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 495-507, May.
    6. Liesbet Hooghe & Tobias Lenz & Gary Marks, 2019. "Contested world order: The delegitimation of international governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 731-743, December.
    7. Vivien Schmidt, 2010. "Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited - Input, Output and Throughput," KFG Working Papers p0021, Free University Berlin.
    8. Cornelia Woll & Sophie Jacquot, 2010. "Using Europe: Strategic Action in Multi-Level Politics," Post-Print hal-01023857, HAL.
    9. Kyriakos Moumoutzis & Sotirios Zartaloudis, 2016. "Europeanization Mechanisms and Process Tracing: A Template for Empirical Research," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 337-352, March.
    10. Bettina Mitru & Paul Tap, 2026. "Rhetorical Consensus About the EU? Comparing Established and New Parties in Europe," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
    11. Jonas Tallberg & Michael Zürn, 2019. "The legitimacy and legitimation of international organizations: introduction and framework," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 581-606, December.
    12. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/f5vtl5h9a73d5ls976m1ga289 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Mitchell, Ronald B., 2011. "Transparency for governance: The mechanisms and effectiveness of disclosure-based and education-based transparency policies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 1882-1890, September.
    14. Cornelia Woll & Sophie Jacquot, 2010. "Using Europe: Strategic Action in Multi-Level Politics," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-01023857, HAL.
    15. Dimitris Bouris & Saul Kenny & Hanna L. Mühlenhoff, 2025. "Queering European Union Foreign and Security Policy: Invisibility, Heteronormativity and Binaries in the EU's Approach to Women, Peace and Security," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(5), pages 1509-1527, September.
    16. Maria Pawelec & Sonja Grimm, 2014. "Does National Identity Matter? Political Conditionality and the Crucial Case of Serbia's (Non-)Co-operation with the ICTY," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(6), pages 1290-1306, November.
    17. Laura Allison-Reumann, 2017. "ASEAN and human rights: challenges to the EU’s diffusion of human rights norms," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 39-54, March.
    18. Mai'a K. Davis Cross & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski & Mai'a K. Davis Cross & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski, 2017. "What Type of Power has the EU Exercised in the Ukraine–Russia Crisis? A Framework of Analysis," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 3-19, January.
    19. Hoyoon Jung, 2019. "The Evolution of Social Constructivism in Political Science: Past to Present," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440198, February.
    20. Florian Stoeckel & Vittorio Mérola & Jack Thompson & Benjamin Lyons & Jason Reifler, 2024. "Public perceptions and misperceptions of political authority in the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 25(1), pages 42-62, March.
    21. Erickson, Jennifer L., 2008. "Normative power and EU arms transfer policy: A theoretical critique and empirical test [Normative Macht und die EU-Waffenlieferungspolitik: Eine theoretische Kritik und ein empirischer Test]," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2008-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:64:y:2026:i:3:p:1190-1203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.