IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v63y2025i1p71-88.html

The European Union's Place in United States–China Strategic Competition: How Role Dynamics Drive Brussels Towards Washington

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Biba

Abstract

Against the backdrop of intensifying United States–China strategic competition, the European Union (EU) has recently changed course and moved closer to mirroring US rhetoric and action on China. Why has this happened, and how can it be best explained? In this article, it is argued that current role dynamics between the EU and the two rival great powers can help us understand the growing, albeit not full, EU–United States alignment on China. Role theory assumes that co‐operation between actors intensifies when their roles become more compatible. Accordingly, it is shown that the EU has recently adjusted its role to be more closely aligned with the United States' position. That is to say, the EU has reshaped its own role conception, whilst the bloc has likewise become more open to meeting US role expectations after EU–United States role‐playing turned positive once again under President Joe Biden.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Biba, 2025. "The European Union's Place in United States–China Strategic Competition: How Role Dynamics Drive Brussels Towards Washington," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(1), pages 71-88, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:63:y:2025:i:1:p:71-88
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13605
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13605?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Checkel, Jeffrey T., 2005. "International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(4), pages 801-826, October.
    2. Thomas Gehring & Kevin Urbanski & Sebastian Oberthür, 2017. "The European Union as an Inadvertent Great Power: EU Actorness and the Ukraine Crisis," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 727-743, July.
    3. Stephan Klose, 2018. "Theorizing the EU's Actorness: Towards an Interactionist Role Theory Framework," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(5), pages 1144-1160, July.
    4. Nele Noesselt, 2014. "China’s contradictory role(s) in world politics: decrypting China’s North Korea strategy," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(7), pages 1307-1325, August.
    5. Julia Gurol & Anna Starkmann, 2021. "New Partners for the Planet? The European Union and China in International Climate Governance from a Role‐Theoretical Perspective," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 518-534, May.
    6. Ian Manners, 2002. "Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 235-258, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. May-Britt Stumbaum, 2015. "The diffusion of norms in security-related fields: views from China, India and the EU," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 331-347, September.
    2. Tanja A. Börzel & Thomas Risse, 2009. "Diffusing (Inter-) Regionalism - The EU as a Model of Regional Integration," KFG Working Papers p0007, Free University Berlin.
    3. Rauh, Christian, 2025. "International recognition of European Union “actorness”: Language-based evidence from United Nations general debate speeches 1970–2020," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 51(5), pages 792-821.
    4. Laura Allison-Reumann, 2017. "ASEAN and human rights: challenges to the EU’s diffusion of human rights norms," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 39-54, March.
    5. Mai'a K. Davis Cross & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski & Mai'a K. Davis Cross & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski, 2017. "What Type of Power has the EU Exercised in the Ukraine–Russia Crisis? A Framework of Analysis," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 3-19, January.
    6. Diego Badell, 2026. "Norm Contestation in EU Foreign Policy: The Case of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 1190-1203, May.
    7. Tanja A. Börzel, 2011. "Comparative Regionalism - A New Research Agenda," KFG Working Papers p0028, Free University Berlin.
    8. Ömer UÐUR, 2016. "The Europranization of national Foreign Policies: The Examples og germany and France within the Framework of Ukraine Crisis," Turkish Economic Review, KSP Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 527-536, September.
    9. Daniela Donno & Michael Neureiter, 2018. "Can human rights conditionality reduce repression? Examining the European Union’s economic agreements," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 335-357, September.
    10. Anna Michalski & Zhongqi Pan, 2017. "Role Dynamics in a Structured Relationship: The EU–China Strategic Partnership," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 611-627, May.
    11. Julia Gurol & Anna Starkmann, 2021. "New Partners for the Planet? The European Union and China in International Climate Governance from a Role‐Theoretical Perspective," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 518-534, May.
    12. Paula Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik & Sandra Lavenex & Philipp Lutz, 2023. "Expanding, Complementing, or Substituting Multilateralism? EU Preferential Trade Agreements in the Migration Regime Complex," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 49-61.
    13. Peter Viggo Jakobsen, 2009. "Small States, Big Influence: The Overlooked Nordic Influence on the Civilian ESDP," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 81-102, January.
    14. Emil Kirchner, 2024. "Geo-economic and geopolitical developments in EU-asia security relations," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 333-349, September.
    15. Luuk Middelaar, 2016. "The Return of Politics – The European Union after the crises in the eurozone and Ukraine," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 495-507, May.
    16. Loredana SIMIONOV, 2021. "European Union's pursuit of resilience in the Eastern Neighbourhood," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 12(4), pages 257-266, February.
    17. Adela Toscano-Valle & Antonio Sianes & Francisco Santos-Carrillo & Luis A. Fernández-Portillo, 2022. "Can the Rational Design of International Institutions Solve Cooperation Problems? Insights from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    18. Mark Pollack & Emilie Hafner-Burton, 2010. "Mainstreaming international governance: The environment, gender, and IO performance in the European Union," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 285-313, September.
    19. Kathleen R. McNamara & Federico Steinberg, 2026. "Can Europe Sustain a New Rules‐Based Geopolitical Order?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(4), pages 1624-1634, July.
    20. Anna van der Vleuten, 2020. "Contestations of Transgender Rights and/in the Strasbourg Court," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 278-289.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:63:y:2025:i:1:p:71-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.