IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v28y2024i2p182-193.html

Linking socio‐economic metabolism models and simulation games: Reflections on benefits and challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Roca‐Puigròs
  • Andreas Gerber
  • Markus Ulrich
  • Matthias Y. Reich
  • Daniel Beat Müller
  • Patrick Wäger

Abstract

Simulation models of socio‐economic metabolisms (SEM) are increasingly used to address questions regarding environmental issues. SEM studies often focus on target audiences such as researchers and decision‐makers by means of scientific articles, reports, and oral presentations. In this contribution, we study the linkage of SEM models and simulation games (SGs) (i) to widen the audience of SEM research to include the general public, who, through their lifestyles, contribute to the studied environmental issues, and (ii) to address the different audiences by means of interaction tools. We illustrate the link through a case study, the postfossilCities SG. Based on the case study, existing SGs, and literature, we identified that linking SEM models with SGs can facilitate (1) the accessibility of SEM models to wider audiences, (2) the communication and understanding of systems with complex dynamics, such as nonlinear behavior, through tools that trigger experiences and emotions, (3) the consideration of actors' dimension of physical systems, and (4) the robustness of SGs by having mass‐ and energy‐balance consistent representations of physical systems. Despite these benefits, linking SEM models and SGs is also bound to challenges, such as (1) the integration of approaches from different disciplines, (2) the high demand on time and financial resources, and (3) the balance between simplification and complexity. In order to facilitate the link between SEM models and SGs, and thus exploit the mentioned benefits, it is important to set‐up connections to game‐related communities and communities with long tradition of using SGs, and use existing game development methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Roca‐Puigròs & Andreas Gerber & Markus Ulrich & Matthias Y. Reich & Daniel Beat Müller & Patrick Wäger, 2024. "Linking socio‐economic metabolism models and simulation games: Reflections on benefits and challenges," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(2), pages 182-193, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:28:y:2024:i:2:p:182-193
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13462
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13462?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juliette N. Rooney-Varga & Florian Kapmeier & John D. Sterman & Andrew P. Jones & Michele Putko & Kenneth Rath, 2020. "The Climate Action Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(2), pages 114-140, April.
    2. Marieke HOBBES & Serge I. P. STALPERS & Jiska KOOIJMAN & Thi Thu Thanh LE & Khanh Chi TRINH & Thi Anh Dao PHAN, 2007. "Material Flows in a Social Context: A Vietnamese Case Study Combining the Materials Flow Analysis and Action‐in‐Context Frameworks," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(1), pages 141-159, January.
    3. Andreas Gerber & Markus Ulrich & Flurin X. Wäger & Marta Roca-Puigròs & João S. V. Gonçalves & Patrick Wäger, 2021. "Games on Climate Change: Identifying Development Potentials through Advanced Classification and Game Characteristics Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    4. Iñigo Capellán-Pérez & David Álvarez-Antelo & Luis J. Miguel, 2019. "Global Sustainability Crossroads : A Participatory Simulation Game to Educate in the Energy and Sustainability Challenges of the 21st Century," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-23, July.
    5. Jan Streeck & Quirin Dammerer & Dominik Wiedenhofer & Fridolin Krausmann, 2021. "The role of socio‐economic material stocks for natural resource use in the United States of America from 1870 to 2100," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(6), pages 1486-1502, December.
    6. David Rochat & Claudia R. Binder & Jaime Diaz & Olivier Jolliet, 2013. "Combining Material Flow Analysis, Life Cycle Assessment, and Multiattribute Utility Theory," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 17(5), pages 642-655, October.
    7. Benoit Cushman‐Roisin & Norman J. Rice III & Michael A. Moldaver, 1999. "A Simulation Tool for Industrial Ecology: Creating a Board Game," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 3(4), pages 131-144, October.
    8. Luca Fraccascia & Alessandra Sabato & Devrim Murat Yazan, 2021. "An industrial symbiosis simulation game: Evidence from the circular sustainable business development class," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(6), pages 1688-1706, December.
    9. Delyse Springett, 2005. "‘Education for sustainability’ in the business studies curriculum: a call for a critical agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(3), pages 146-159, May.
    10. Stefan Pauliuk & Niko Heeren & Peter Berrill & Tomer Fishman & Andrea Nistad & Qingshi Tu & Paul Wolfram & Edgar G. Hertwich, 2021. "Global scenarios of resource and emission savings from material efficiency in residential buildings and cars," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    11. David F. Batten, 2009. "Fostering Industrial Symbiosis With Agent‐Based Simulation and Participatory Modeling," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 13(2), pages 197-213, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan Streeck & Hanspeter Wieland & Stefan Pauliuk & Barbara Plank & Kenichi Nakajima & Dominik Wiedenhofer, 2023. "A review of methods to trace material flows into final products in dynamic material flow analysis: Comparative application of six methods to the United States and EXIOBASE3 regions, Part 2," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(2), pages 457-475, April.
    2. David Frantz & Franz Schug & Dominik Wiedenhofer & André Baumgart & Doris Virág & Sam Cooper & Camila Gómez-Medina & Fabian Lehmann & Thomas Udelhoven & Sebastian Linden & Patrick Hostert & Helmut Hab, 2023. "Unveiling patterns in human dominated landscapes through mapping the mass of US built structures," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Bin He & Xin Yuan & Shusheng Qian & Bing Li, 2023. "Product low‐carbon design, manufacturing, logistics, and recycling: An overview," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(5), September.
    4. Camelia Ilie & Gaston Fornes & Guillermo Cardoza & Juan Carlos Mondragón Quintana, 2020. "Development of Business Schools in Emerging Markets: Learning through Adoption and Adaptation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-28, October.
    5. Oulu, Martin, 2015. "The unequal exchange of Dutch cheese and Kenyan roses: Introducing and testing an LCA-based methodology for estimating ecologically unequal exchange," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 372-383.
    6. Horn, Stefan & Gough, Ian & Rogers, Charlotte & Tunstall, Rebecca, 2025. "Meeting housing needs within planetary boundaries: A UK case study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    7. Kasper Lange & Gijsbert Korevaar & Igor Nikolic & Paulien Herder, 2021. "Actor Behaviour and Robustness of Industrial Symbiosis Networks: An Agent-Based Modelling Approach," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 24(3), pages 1-8.
    8. zu Ermgassen, Sophus & Drewniok, Michal & Bull, Joseph & Walker, Christine Corlet & Mancini, Mattia & Ryan-Collins, Josh & Serrenho, André Cabrera, 2022. "A home for all within planetary boundaries: pathways for meeting England’s housing needs without transgressing national climate and biodiversity goals," OSF Preprints 5kxce, Center for Open Science.
    9. Neeraj Singhal & Preeti Suryawanshi & Garima Mittal, 2017. "Crafting Responsible Management Practices in Business School Learning Outcomes: An Indian Case Study," Vision, , vol. 21(1), pages 46-62, March.
    10. Gaston Fornes & Abel Monfort & Camelia Ilie & Chun Kwong (Tony) Koo & Guillermo Cardoza, 2019. "Ethics, Responsibility, and Sustainability in MBAs. Understanding the Motivations for the Incorporation of ERS in Less Traditional Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Kasper P.H. Lange & Gijsbert Korevaar & Inge F. Oskam & Paulien M. Herder, 2017. "Developing and Understanding Design Interventions in Relation to Industrial Symbiosis Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-14, May.
    12. Rosanna Cole & Brent Snider, 2020. "Rolling the Dice on Global Supply Chain Sustainability: A Total Cost of Ownership Simulation," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 165-176, May.
    13. Meshal Aldawsari & Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi, 2025. "Resilience Assessment and Sustainability Enhancement of Gas and CO 2 Utilization via Carbon–Hydrogen–Oxygen Symbiosis Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-22, September.
    14. J. Raimbault & J. Broere & M. Somveille & J. M. Serna & E. Strombom & C. Moore & B. Zhu & L. Sugar, 2020. "A spatial agent based model for simulating and optimizing networked eco-industrial systems," Papers 2003.14133, arXiv.org.
    15. Nici Zimmermann & Irene Pluchinotta & Giuseppe Salvia & Marianne Touchie & Helen Stopps & Ian Hamilton & Ted Kesik & Kaveh Dianati & Ting Chen, 2021. "Moving online: reflections from conducting system dynamics workshops in virtual settings," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 37(1), pages 59-71, January.
    16. Dolors Setó-Pamies & Eleni Papaoikonomou, 2016. "A Multi-level Perspective for the Integration of Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability (ECSRS) in Management Education," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(3), pages 523-538, July.
    17. Joris Baars & Mohammad Ali Rajaeifar & Oliver Heidrich, 2022. "Quo vadis MFA? Integrated material flow analysis to support material efficiency," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1487-1503, August.
    18. Anselm Schneider, 2015. "Reflexivity in Sustainability Accounting and Management: Transcending the Economic Focus of Corporate Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 525-536, March.
    19. Yifei Yu & Marc van den Berg & Devrim Murat Yazan, 2024. "Circular (de)construction matchmaking: A matter of space and time," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(4), pages 868-884, August.
    20. Devrim Murat Yazan & Vahid Yazdanpanah & Luca Fraccascia, 2020. "Learning strategic cooperative behavior in industrial symbiosis: A game‐theoretic approach integrated with agent‐based simulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 2078-2091, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:28:y:2024:i:2:p:182-193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.