IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v49y2025i6p1356-1377.html

THE AFTERMATH OF THE ANKARA STATION MASSACRE: The Agency of Urban Design in the Right to Memory

Author

Listed:
  • Deniz Kimyon Tuna

Abstract

On 10 October 2015, thousands of people gathered for a political rally at a public square in front of the Ankara train station in Turkey. At 10:04 a.m., two bombs planted by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) struck the demonstration area, leaving behind a space ravaged by blood, cries and pain. Following the brutal attack, the space of Ankara Train Station Square changed in profound ways for survivors. Today, nearly a decade later, people continue to gather in the square on the tenth day of every month to commemorate their comrades who were assassinated in this space. In this article I draw on a rich literature on memorials and public spaces, and urban contests over delimiting and defining traumatic spaces and spatializing memory, to examine the processes and experiences of traumatic space as struggles for justice. I zoom in on one aspect of the attack’s aftermath: a design competition meant to set in motion the transformation of an urban space marked by trauma and political contestation. Through this competition, I analyse the politics of confronting atrocity and try to situate this politics within the right to memory—a crucial, if overlooked, discussion within thinking and action around the idea of the right to the city.

Suggested Citation

  • Deniz Kimyon Tuna, 2025. "THE AFTERMATH OF THE ANKARA STATION MASSACRE: The Agency of Urban Design in the Right to Memory," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(6), pages 1356-1377, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:49:y:2025:i:6:p:1356-1377
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.13362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13362
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.13362?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:49:y:2025:i:6:p:1356-1377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.