IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v35y2020i6p1335-1350.html

A conceptual framework of quality of life in chronic kidney disease in Turkey: A patient‐focused approach

Author

Listed:
  • Gamze Bayin Donar
  • Mehmet Top

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the quality of life of patients with chronic kidney disease who were receiving dialysis treatment. It also aimed to identify the factors affecting the quality of life of these patients. The independent variables analyzed were: patients' sociodemographic characteristics, organizational characteristics, adherence to treatment, patient‐physician relationship, and patient activation level. The sample consisted of 328 patients with chronic kidney disease who received services from dialysis units of two university hospitals and two private dialysis centers. Data analysis was performed through multivariate regression. Results showed that receiving treatment from a hospital‐based dialysis unit may have a positive effect in patients' quality of life; and patient‐physician relationship, patient activity, and adherence to treatment may positively affect quality of life. Thus, planning of health service delivery that focus on improving the quality of life of patients who are more active by allowing them to establish positive relationships with their physicians and to have a better adherence to treatment should be adopted. These findings may provide health managers, health professionals, and individual patients with evidence‐based information about treatment management and health service planning processes related to chronic kidney disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Gamze Bayin Donar & Mehmet Top, 2020. "A conceptual framework of quality of life in chronic kidney disease in Turkey: A patient‐focused approach," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(6), pages 1335-1350, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:35:y:2020:i:6:p:1335-1350
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3038
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nancy J. Devlin & Koonal K. Shah & Yan Feng & Brendan Mulhern & Ben van Hout, 2018. "Valuing health‐related quality of life: An EQ‐5D‐5L value set for England," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 7-22, January.
    2. Xiao-Jing Tu & Wen-Juh Hwang & Hui-Ing Ma & Ling-Hui Chang & Shih-Pin Hsu, 2017. "Determinants of generic and specific health-related quality of life in patients with Parkinson’s disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-12, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Webb, Edward J.D. & Hess, Stephane, 2021. "Joint modelling of choice and rating data: Theory and examples," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    2. Admassu N. Lamu, 2020. "Does linear equating improve prediction in mapping? Crosswalking MacNew onto EQ-5D-5L value sets," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(6), pages 903-915, August.
    3. Chen, Gang & Ratcliffe, Julie & Milte, Rachel & Khadka, Jyoti & Kaambwa, Billingsley, 2021. "Quality of care experience in aged care: An Australia-Wide discrete choice experiment to elicit preference weights," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    4. Lipman, Stefan A. & Brouwer, Werner B.F. & Attema, Arthur E., 2020. "Living up to expectations: Experimental tests of subjective life expectancy as reference point in time trade-off and standard gamble," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. Rowen, Donna & Mukuria, Clara & Bray, Nathan & Carlton, Jill & Longworth, Louise & Meads, David & O'Neill, Ciaran & Shah, Koonal & Yang, Yaling, 2022. "Assessing the comparative feasibility, acceptability and equivalence of videoconference interviews and face-to-face interviews using the time trade-off technique," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    6. Nancy J. Devlin & Feng Xie & Bernhard Slaap & Elly Stolk, 2025. "Measuring and Valuing Health Using EuroQol Instruments: New Developments 2025 and Beyond," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 947-960, November.
    7. Olsen, Jan Abel & Lindberg, Marie Hella & Lamu, Admassu Nadew, 2020. "Health and wellbeing in Norway: Population norms and the social gradient," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    8. Wen Wan & M. Reza Skandari & Alexa Minc & Aviva G. Nathan & Parmida Zarei & Aaron N. Winn & Michael O’Grady & Elbert S. Huang, 2018. "Cost-effectiveness of Initiating an Insulin Pump in T1D Adults Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared with Multiple Daily Insulin Injections: The DIAMOND Randomized Trial," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 38(8), pages 942-953, November.
    9. Lin, Lin & He, Min & Zai, Xianhua, 2025. "Evaluating the impact of long-term care insurance reform on health-related quality of life and inequality among older adults in China: A quasi-experimental analysis," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    10. Marcel F. Jonker & Richard Norman, 2022. "Not all respondents use a multiplicative utility function in choice experiments for health state valuations, which should be reflected in the elicitation format (or statistical analysis)," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 431-439, February.
    11. Saeideh Babashahi & Nicola Carey & Karen Stenner & Kath Hart & Yogini Jani & Judith Edwards & Natalia Hounsome, 2026. "A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis of prescribing by dietitians and therapeutic radiographers in England," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 27(1), pages 117-133, February.
    12. Brendan Mulhern & Richard Norman & John Brazier, 2021. "Valuing SF-6Dv2 in Australia Using an International Protocol," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 39(10), pages 1151-1162, October.
    13. Nyantara Wickramasekera & Aki Tsuchiya, 2025. "A Large Scale Population Survey of Health and Wellbeing to Allow Comparisons Between Outcome Measures: the SIPHER-HWMIC Dataset," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 180(3), pages 1265-1290, December.
    14. Spencer, Anne & Rivero-Arias, Oliver & Wong, Ruth & Tsuchiya, Aki & Bleichrodt, Han & Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor & Norman, Richard & Lloyd, Andrew & Clarke, Philip, 2022. "The QALY at 50: One story many voices," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    15. Guillem L pez-Casasnovas & Jos Luis Pinto Prades, 2022. "QALY Maximization and the Social Optimum," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 242(3), pages 111-127, September.
    16. Mihir Gandhi & Marcus Ang & Kelvin Teo & Chee Wai Wong & Yvonne Chung-Hsi Wei & Rachel Lee-Yin Tan & Mathieu F. Janssen & Nan Luo, 2019. "EQ-5D-5L is More Responsive than EQ-5D-3L to Treatment Benefit of Cataract Surgery," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 12(4), pages 383-392, August.
    17. Tiantian Zhang & Aixue Zhang & Jing Li & Fangyu Li & Peng Liu & Pei Wang, 2026. "Comparing EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 utilities with QLU-C10D utilities in hematologic cancer patients," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 27(2), pages 411-421, March.
    18. Rachael Maree Hunter & Rob Anderson & Tim Kirkpatrick & Charlotte Lennox & Fiona Warren & Rod S. Taylor & Jenny Shaw & Mark Haddad & Alex Stirzaker & Mike Maguire & Richard Byng, 2022. "Economic evaluation of a complex intervention (Engager) for prisoners with common mental health problems, near to and after release: a cost-utility and cost-consequences analysis," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(2), pages 193-210, March.
    19. Ava F. H. Hoogenboom & Stefan A. Lipman, 2025. "Loss aversion in EQ-5D-Y-3L: does it explain differences in willingness to trade-off life years in adults and children?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 26(8), pages 1369-1381, November.
    20. Sahar Al Shabasy & Bram Roudijk & Maggie Abbassi & Aureliano Finch & Elly Stolk & Samar Farid, 2023. "The Egyptian EQ-5D-5L Extensive Pilot Study: Lessons Learned," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 329-338, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:35:y:2020:i:6:p:1335-1350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.