IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v16y2025i4p589-601.html

Busting the Myth of Convergence Between the EU and LAC Countries: Analysis From UN Resolutions

Author

Listed:
  • Rafael Mesquita
  • Bruno Theodoro Luciano

Abstract

Politicians and scholars have often considered Europe and Latin America and the Caribbean as like‐minded, natural partners, characterized not only by historical and cultural ties, but also by shared values and principles. This article aims to test the extent to which EU‐LAC convergence is a reality by comparing the agreement between both regions in multilateral arenas. Specifically, we explore the similarity in roll‐call votes and cosponsorship of draft resolutions at the UN General Assembly from 2000 to 2020. EU‐LAC convergence on those metrics is placed into perspective by comparing similarities across all UN regional groups. Furthermore, our analysis zooms in on the content of the proposals to detect the issues that have caused greater divergence/convergence between EU‐LAC. We find that the two regions continuously cooperate on the rights of the child, but are increasingly at odds with regard to topics such as human rights and armaments. The realist tone of these themes suggests that a normative Europe has met an emerging geopolitical Europe that is increasingly concerned with security‐related issues. We trace this new agenda to the rising challenges in Europe's external relations, from protectionism to the Russia–Ukraine war, and see the diminishing EU‐LAC convergence as its multilateral expression.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafael Mesquita & Bruno Theodoro Luciano, 2025. "Busting the Myth of Convergence Between the EU and LAC Countries: Analysis From UN Resolutions," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(4), pages 589-601, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:4:p:589-601
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13491
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13491
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13491?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Soo Yeon & Russett, Bruce, 1996. "The new politics of voting alignments in the United Nations General Assembly," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(4), pages 629-652, October.
    2. Ian Manners, 2002. "Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 235-258, June.
    3. Rafael Mesquita & Rodrigo Martins & Pedro Seabra, 2022. "Estimating ideal points from UN General Assembly sponsorship data," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(6), pages 1233-1252, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paula Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik & Sandra Lavenex & Philipp Lutz, 2023. "Expanding, Complementing, or Substituting Multilateralism? EU Preferential Trade Agreements in the Migration Regime Complex," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 49-61.
    2. Peter Viggo Jakobsen, 2009. "Small States, Big Influence: The Overlooked Nordic Influence on the Civilian ESDP," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 81-102, January.
    3. Emil Kirchner, 2024. "Geo-economic and geopolitical developments in EU-asia security relations," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 333-349, September.
    4. Richard Hanania, 2019. "Are Liberal Governments More Cooperative? Voting Trends at the UN in Five Anglophone Democracies," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(6), pages 1403-1432, July.
    5. Natalia Chaban & Alister Miskimmon & Ben O'Loughlin, 2017. "The EU's Peace and Security Narrative: Views from EU Strategic Partners in Asia," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(6), pages 1273-1289, November.
    6. Axel Dreher & Shu Yu, 2016. "The Alma Mater Effect - Does Foreign Education of Political Leaders Influence Foreign Policy?," CESifo Working Paper Series 5871, CESifo.
    7. Luuk Middelaar, 2016. "The Return of Politics – The European Union after the crises in the eurozone and Ukraine," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 495-507, May.
    8. Loredana SIMIONOV, 2021. "European Union's pursuit of resilience in the Eastern Neighbourhood," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 12(4), pages 257-266, February.
    9. Min-hyung Kim & Jinwoo Choi, 2020. "What kind of power is the EU? The EU’s policies toward North Korea’s WMD programs and the debate about the EU’s role in the security arena," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-16, March.
    10. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:579-616 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Alexander Kentikelenis & Erik Voeten, 2021. "Legitimacy challenges to the liberal world order: Evidence from United Nations speeches, 1970–2018," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 721-754, October.
    12. Haddadi, Said, 2004. "Political Securitisation and Democratisation in the Maghreb: Ambiguous Discourses and Fine-tuning Practices for a Security Partnership," Institute of European Studies, Working Paper Series qt8qm646tx, Institute of European Studies, UC Berkeley.
    13. Jinsong Fu & Min Yang, 2026. "Reconciling normativity and geopolitics: analyzing von der Leyen’s de-risking discourse from a practical argumentation perspective," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 313-330, June.
    14. Andrei SCRINIC, 2014. "The Eastern Partnership As Part Of The Eu Foreign Policy: A Review Of Theoretical Approaches," EURINT, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 1, pages 219-230.
    15. May-Britt Stumbaum, 2015. "The diffusion of norms in security-related fields: views from China, India and the EU," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 331-347, September.
    16. Qi Haixia, 2023. "China’s partners or US allies: the dual status of major European states and their voting behaviour in the UNGA," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 225-250, June.
    17. Escribano, Gonzalo & Paredes-Gazquez, Juandiego & San-Martín, Enrique, 2020. "The European Union and the good governance of energy resources: Practicing what it preaches?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    18. Taku Yukawa, 2018. "European integration through the eyes of ASEAN: Rethinking Eurocentrism in comparative regionalism," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 21(4), pages 323-339, December.
    19. Agnieszka Konopelko, 2018. "Eurasian Economic Union: a challenge for EU policy towards Kazakhstan," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, March.
    20. Ileana Daniela Serban, 2021. "The European Union: From a Complex Adaptive System to a Policy Interpreter," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 388-403, March.
    21. Münevver Cebeci, 2025. "‘Europe and the Rest’ in Official EU Discourse: Legitimising ‘Geopolitical Europe’ Through the ‘Jungle’ Analogy and Beyond," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(5), pages 1438-1459, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:4:p:589-601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.