IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v14y2023i5p818-831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China's 5G and supercomputing industrial policies: A critical (comparative) analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yuhan Zhang

Abstract

The Chinese central government has greatly supported two strategic high‐tech industries: 5G and supercomputing. However, when both encountered similar U.S. sanctions, the 5G industry failed to make crucial upstream components while the supercomputing industry could. This article argues that the central government‐level industrial policies contributed to these divergent outcomes. Using natural language processing and qualitative content analysis of meticulously collected official documents and secondary sources, key policy differences were identified. Before the U.S. sanctions in May 2019, China's 5G industrial policies were significantly unbalanced, with inadequate attention given to research and development of vital upstream components, contributing to a lack of upstream investment. Although recent attempts to rebalance 5G industrial development since 2021, the policy focus remains largely on the mid and downstream segments. In contrast, before the U.S. sanctions in 2015, the supercomputing industrial policies emphasised the development of the entire industrial chain, including crucial upstream components, resulting in China's possession of entirely homegrown supercomputers. Leveraging a tri‐level analysis framework rooted in political economics, this study also offers possible explanations for the policy divergence and discusses implications. It contributes to the existing literature and ongoing debate on China and industrial policy amidst great power high‐tech competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuhan Zhang, 2023. "China's 5G and supercomputing industrial policies: A critical (comparative) analysis," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(5), pages 818-831, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:14:y:2023:i:5:p:818-831
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13239
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13239?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fuller, Douglas B., 2016. "Paper Tigers, Hidden Dragons: Firms and the Political Economy of China's Technological Development," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198777205.
    2. Qiuyun Zhao & Zeyu Li & Zuoxiang Zhao & Jinqiu Ma, 2019. "Industrial Policy and Innovation Capability of Strategic Emerging Industries: Empirical Evidence from Chinese New Energy Vehicle Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Oh, Seung-Youn, 2021. "China's Race to the Top: Regional and Global Implications of China's Industrial Policy," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 169-185, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luo, Lianfa & Cheng, Zhiming & Ye, Qingqing & Cheng, Yanjun & Smyth, Russell & Yang, Zhiqing & Zhang, Le, 2023. "Nonmonetary Awards and Innovation: Evidence from Winning China's Top Brand Contest," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1345, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    2. Yanyang Yan & Juan Wang & Sijia Qiao, 2022. "Effects of Industrial Policy on Firms’ Innovation Outputs: Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, September.
    3. Zhu, Ying & Sardana, Deepak & Tang, Ryan, 2022. "Heterogeneity in OFDI by EMNEs: Drivers and trends of Chinese and Indian firms," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(6).
    4. Sean Kenji Starrs & Julian Germann, 2021. "Responding to the China Challenge in Techno‐nationalism: Divergence between Germany and the United States," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(5), pages 1122-1146, September.
    5. Susheng Wang & Gang Chen & Dawei Huang, 2021. "Can the New Energy Vehicle Pilot Policy Achieve Green Innovation and Emission Reduction?—A Difference-in-Differences Analysis on the Evaluation of China’s New Energy Fiscal Subsidy Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Wang, Yanbo & Li, Jizhen & Furman, Jeffrey L., 2017. "Firm performance and state innovation funding: Evidence from China’s innofund program," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 1142-1161.
    7. Lei Luo & Zhenhua Zheng & Jing Luo & Yuqiu Jia & Qi Zhang & Chun Wu & Yifeng Zhang & Jia Sun, 2020. "Spatial Agglomeration of Manufacturing in the Wuhan Metropolitan Area: An Analysis of Sectoral Patterns and Determinants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-23, September.
    8. Wolfgang Weiß, 2023. "The EU's strategic autonomy in times of politicisation of international trade: The future of commission accountability," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(S3), pages 54-64, July.
    9. Jiang, Zhangsheng & Xu, Chenghao, 2023. "Policy incentives, government subsidies, and technological innovation in new energy vehicle enterprises: Evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    10. Jing Zhao & Michael Carney & Shubo Zhang & Limin Zhu, 2020. "How does an intra-family succession effect strategic change and performance in China’s family firms?," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 363-389, June.
    11. Maria Markaki & Stelios Papadakis & Anna Putnová, 2021. "A Modern Industrial Policy for the Czech Republic: Optimizing the Structure of Production," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-20, November.
    12. Xue Wang & Baizhou Li & Shi Yin, 2020. "The Convergence Management of Strategic Emerging Industries: Sustainable Design Analysis for Facilitating the Improvement of Innovation Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
    13. Barbieri, Elisa & Huang, Manli & Pi, Shenglei & Pollio, Chiara & Rubini, Lauretta, 2021. "Investigating the linkages between industrial policies and M&A dynamics: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    14. Cailou Jiang & Ying Zhang & Qun Zhao & Chong Wu, 2020. "The Impact of Purchase Subsidy on Enterprises’ R&D Efforts: Evidence from China’s New Energy Vehicle Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-10, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:14:y:2023:i:5:p:818-831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.