IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v13y2022i2p247-258.html

Sharing the Benefits of Asteroid Mining

Author

Listed:
  • Eglė Butkevičienė
  • Florian Rabitz

Abstract

Near‐Earth asteroids (NEAs) hold metal reserves that could sustain global consumption for millennia. Unresolved questions of technological and economic feasibility notwithstanding, NEA mining could ensure the accessibility and affordability of key strategic resources, contribute to sustainability transitions and displace environmentally and socially harmful terrestrial mining. Based on implicit and explicit normative commitments towards the common heritage principle in international space law, we develop the outlines of a regime for the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits resulting from NEA mining. For doing so, we analyze the linkages between institutional design and regime effectiveness for benefit‐sharing regimes in the areas of deep‐sea mining and plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Attempting to control for differences in problem structure, we transpose this analysis to the case of NEA mining, where an effective benefit‐sharing regime would revolve around the following elements: standardized exploration and exploitation contracts, back‐end benefit‐sharing as a percentage of commercial profits, research exemptions, compliance mechanisms for preventing and reducing space pollution, as well as a reserve banking system for mining claims. For the contemporary political debate on space resources, we thus aim to provide a feasible alternative to the exclusive appropriation of space resources through private property rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Eglė Butkevičienė & Florian Rabitz, 2022. "Sharing the Benefits of Asteroid Mining," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(2), pages 247-258, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:13:y:2022:i:2:p:247-258
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13035
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin Faude & Michal Parizek, 2021. "Contested multilateralism as credible signaling: how strategic inconsistency can induce cooperation among states," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 843-870, October.
    2. Nico Schrijver, 2016. "Managing the global commons: common good or common sink?," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(7), pages 1252-1267, July.
    3. Ronald B. Mitchell, 2006. "Problem Structure, Institutional Design, and the Relative Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 6(3), pages 72-89, August.
    4. Ostrom,Elinor, 2015. "Governing the Commons," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107569782.
    5. Wijkman, Per Magnus, 1982. "Managing the global commons," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(3), pages 511-536, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arpit Raswant & Bo Bernhard Nielsen & Peter J. Buckley, 2025. "Space: a new frontier for international business," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 56(5), pages 567-588, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Salustri, 2021. "Social and solidarity economy and social and solidarity commons: Towards the (re)discovery of an ethic of the common good?," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(1), pages 13-32, March.
    2. Vicente Pinilla, 2024. "Agricliometrics and Agricultural Change in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries," Springer Books, in: Claude Diebolt & Michael Haupert (ed.), Handbook of Cliometrics, edition 3, pages 1837-1869, Springer.
    3. Fancello, Giovanna & Tsoukiàs, Alexis, 2021. "Learning urban capabilities from behaviours. A focus on visitors values for urban planning," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    4. Darcy W E Allen, 2020. "When Entrepreneurs Meet:The Collective Governance of New Ideas," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number q0269.
    5. Daniel Edward Callies & Darrel Moellendorf, 2021. "Assessing climate policies: Catastrophe avoidance and the right to sustainable development," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 20(2), pages 127-150, May.
    6. Lecoutere, Els & Jassogne, Laurence, 2016. ""We're in this together": Changing intra-household decision making for more cooperative smallholder farming," IOB Working Papers 2016.02, Universiteit Antwerpen, Institute of Development Policy (IOB).
    7. Vesco, Paola & Dasgupta, Shouro & De Cian, Enrica & Carraro, Carlo, 2020. "Natural resources and conflict: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    8. Robert Wade & Geraint Ellis, 2022. "Reclaiming the Windy Commons: Landownership, Wind Rights, and the Assetization of Renewable Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-31, May.
    9. Tobias Böhmelt & Jürg Vollenweider, 2015. "Information flows and social capital through linkages: the effectiveness of the CLRTAP network," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 105-123, May.
    10. Jan-Erik Lane, 2018. "Climate Change Is not Only GHGs but Also Economics," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 5(6), pages 33-41, November.
    11. Jan-Erik LANE & Florent DIETERLEN, 2017. "Hawking irreversibility and socio-economic derminism," Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, KSP Journals, vol. 4(4), pages 357-364, December.
    12. Garcia-Murillo, Martha & MacInnes, Ian, 2018. "Così fan tutte: A better approach than the right to be forgotten," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 227-240.
    13. Roland Bessenay, 2026. "Recognition as an Alternative Form of Work Organization: A Case Study of Three Free/Libre Open‐Source Software Projects," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 1180-1193, April.
    14. Sean Ohlendorf, 2020. "The Third Pillar: The Revival of Community in a Polarised World ‐ by Raghuram Rajan," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 34(1), pages 76-78, May.
    15. Philippe BANCE & Marie-J. BOUCHARD & Dorothea GREILING (ed.), 2022. "New perspectives in the co-production of public policies, public services and common goods," CIRIEC Studies Series, CIRIEC - Université de Liège, volume 3, number css3.
    16. Maas, Alexander & Watson, Philip, 2018. "Enthusiasm curbed: Home value implications of curbside parking rights," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 705-711.
    17. Tom Delreux & Joseph Earsom, 2023. "The European Union as an Actor Navigating International Regime Complexes," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 1-5.
    18. Felix Poschinger, 2024. "From Clovis to Göbekli Tepe: Knowledge Transfer, Specialisation and its Effects on Cultural Memory," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 10, January -.
    19. Ekhi Atutxa & Imanol Zubero & Iñigo Calvo-Sotomayor, 2020. "Scalability of Low Carbon Energy Communities in Spain: An Empiric Approach from the Renewed Commons Paradigm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-23, September.
    20. Gianluigi Cisco & Andrea Gatto, 2021. "Climate Justice in an Intergenerational Sustainability Framework: A Stochastic OLG Model," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-13, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:13:y:2022:i:2:p:247-258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.