IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejisjr/291.html

From Clovis to Göbekli Tepe: Knowledge Transfer, Specialisation and its Effects on Cultural Memory

Author

Listed:
  • Felix Poschinger

    (Knowledge Exchange Agency, University of Hamburg, Rothenbaumchaussee 19)

Abstract

The following article analyses the effects of knowledge transfer and specialisation of digital society on cultural memory. Firstly, it questions Assman’s hypothesis that cultural memory is ‘transcendent’ and instead argues for a concept of temporal continuity with regard to the contemporary communicative memory. Secondly, it outlines that the process of decoding the identity-function of cultural memory has become increasingly complex due to specialisation and fragmentation. Thirdly, it gives examples of recent misrepresentations of identity-formation and cultural memory in the petroglyphs of the Clovis first hypothesis and Göbekli Tepe and discusses their respective reconfigurations based on transdisciplinary and digital methods as an illustration of the effects of specialisation and knowledge exchange on cultural memory. Fourthly, it situates the findings within the context of emerging knowledge exchange ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Felix Poschinger, 2024. "From Clovis to Göbekli Tepe: Knowledge Transfer, Specialisation and its Effects on Cultural Memory," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 10, January -.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejisjr:291
    DOI: 10.26417/ghw02820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejis/article/view/1705
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejis_v10_i1_24/Poschinger.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/ghw02820?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wijkman, Per Magnus, 1982. "Managing the global commons," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(3), pages 511-536, July.
    2. Liliana B. Andonova, 2010. "Public-Private Partnerships for the Earth: Politics and Patterns of Hybrid Authority in the Multilateral System," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 10(2), pages 25-53, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Halyna Mishenina & Jaroslav Dvorak, 2022. "Public–Private Partnership as a Form of Ensuring Sustainable Development of the Forest Management Sphere," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, November.
    2. Stephanie J. Rickard, 2025. "International negotiations over the global commons," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 999-1021, December.
    3. Oliver Westerwinter, 2021. "Transnational public-private governance initiatives in world politics: Introducing a new dataset," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 137-174, January.
    4. Anne-Kathrin Weber, 2018. "The revival of the Honourable Merchant? Analysing private forest governance at firm level," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 619-634, August.
    5. Bernhard Reinsberg & Oliver Westerwinter, 2021. "The global governance of international development: Documenting the rise of multi-stakeholder partnerships and identifying underlying theoretical explanations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 59-94, January.
    6. Kenneth W. Abbott & Benjamin Faude, 2022. "Hybrid institutional complexes in global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 263-291, April.
    7. Daniel Lambach, 2022. "The Territorialization of the Global Commons: Evidence From Ocean Governance," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 41-50.
    8. Jessica F. Green, 2024. "The Climate Establishment and the Paris partnerships," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(6), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Peter Dauvergne & Jennifer Clapp, 2016. "Researching Global Environmental Politics in the 21st Century," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, February.
    10. Kenneth Abbott & Duncan Snidal, 2010. "International regulation without international government: Improving IO performance through orchestration," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 315-344, September.
    11. Liliana B. Andonova & Ioana A. Tuta, 2014. "Transnational Networks and Paths to EU Environmental Compliance: Evidence from New Member States," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 775-793, July.
    12. Pham, Thu Thuy & Tang, Thi Kim Hong & Ngo, Vy Thao & Tran, Ngoc My Hoa & Nguyen, Thi Thuy Anh & Nguyen, Thi Van Anh & Nguyen, Trung Son & Nguyen, Dinh Yen Khue, 2025. "Multistakeholder forums in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam: Stakeholders’ perspectives regarding their outcomes and effectiveness for low-emission food systems," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    13. Geiguen Shin, 2022. "How Ostrom's design principles apply to large‐scale commons: Cooperation over international river basins," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(5), pages 674-697, September.
    14. repec:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i:s5:p:15-25 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Ida Dokk Smith & Gavkharkhon Mamadzhanova & Indra Overland, 2025. "Mapping the Participation of ASEAN Actors in International Climate Initiatives," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), May.
    16. Xu, Jiuping & Gao, Wen & Xie, Heping & Dai, Jingqi & Lv, Chengwei & Li, Meihui, 2018. "Integrated tech-paradigm based innovative approach towards ecological coal mining," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 297-308.
    17. Oscar Widerberg & Idil Boran & Sander Chan & Andrew Deneault & Marcel Kok & Katarzyna Negacz & Philipp Pattberg & Matilda Petersson, 2023. "Finding synergies and trade‐offs when linking biodiversity and climate change through cooperative initiatives," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(1), pages 157-161, February.
    18. Sanderink, Lisa & Nasiritousi, Naghmeh, 2020. "How institutional interactions can strengthen effectiveness: The case of multi-stakeholder partnerships for renewable energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    19. Carole-Anne Sénit, 2020. "Transforming our world? Discursive representation in the negotiations on the Sustainable Development Goals," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 411-429, September.
    20. Klaus H. Goetz & Ronny Patz & Erin R. Graham, 2017. "Follow the Money: How Trends in Financing Are Changing Governance at International Organizations," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8, pages 15-25, August.
    21. Benjamin Cashore & Jette Steen Knudsen & Jeremy Moon & Hamish van der Ven, 2021. "Private authority and public policy interactions in global context: Governance spheres for problem solving," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1166-1182, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejisjr:291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.org/index.php/ejis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.