IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v12y2022i4p156-d963736.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public–Private Partnership as a Form of Ensuring Sustainable Development of the Forest Management Sphere

Author

Listed:
  • Halyna Mishenina

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Klaipėda University, 92294 Klaipėda, Lithuania)

  • Jaroslav Dvorak

    (Department of Public Administration and Political Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Klaipėda University, 92294 Klaipėda, Lithuania
    School of Public Management, Governance & Public Policy, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

Abstract

This article examines the application of one of the forms of modern public management—public–private partnership (PPP)—in the forestry sector. This contributes to the search for new forms and methods that uphold the principles of sustainable development, decentralization, liberalization and capitalization of natural resources. The purpose of this study is to determine the characteristic features and advantages of PPP as a special partnership between the state and business-entrepreneurial structures, as well as to analyze the prospects and justify the feasibility of using PPP tools to ensure effective forestry. The research methodology was based on the critical analysis of the scholarly literature. Strategic documents, political reports and programs relevant to the forestry sector were also examined. In summary, it can be said that PPP models are a significant addition to other types of cooperation, such as more formal, top-down initiatives. PPP forestry projects can enable the accomplishment of otherwise impossible tasks.

Suggested Citation

  • Halyna Mishenina & Jaroslav Dvorak, 2022. "Public–Private Partnership as a Form of Ensuring Sustainable Development of the Forest Management Sphere," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:156-:d:963736
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/4/156/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/4/156/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sylvester Ngome Chisika & Chunho Yeom, 2021. "Enhancing Sustainable Management of Public Natural Forests Through Public Private Partnerships in Kenya," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    2. Liliana B. Andonova, 2010. "Public-Private Partnerships for the Earth: Politics and Patterns of Hybrid Authority in the Multilateral System," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 10(2), pages 25-53, May.
    3. Valentina Burksiene & Jaroslav Dvorak, 2020. "Performance Management In Protected Areas: Localizing Governance Of The Curonian Spit National Park, Lithuania," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 5, pages 105-124.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elena Borin & Luca Rossato, 2023. "Sustainable Management of International Partnerships for Cultural Heritage Digitization in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oliver Westerwinter, 2021. "Transnational public-private governance initiatives in world politics: Introducing a new dataset," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 137-174, January.
    2. Kenneth W. Abbott & Benjamin Faude, 2022. "Hybrid institutional complexes in global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 263-291, April.
    3. Kenneth Abbott & Duncan Snidal, 2010. "International regulation without international government: Improving IO performance through orchestration," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 315-344, September.
    4. Liliana B. Andonova & Ioana A. Tuta, 2014. "Transnational Networks and Paths to EU Environmental Compliance: Evidence from New Member States," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 775-793, July.
    5. Klaus H. Goetz & Ronny Patz & Erin R. Graham, 2017. "Follow the Money: How Trends in Financing Are Changing Governance at International Organizations," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(s5), pages 15-25, August.
    6. Oscar Widerberg & Idil Boran & Sander Chan & Andrew Deneault & Marcel Kok & Katarzyna Negacz & Philipp Pattberg & Matilda Petersson, 2023. "Finding synergies and trade‐offs when linking biodiversity and climate change through cooperative initiatives," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(1), pages 157-161, February.
    7. Sanderink, Lisa & Nasiritousi, Naghmeh, 2020. "How institutional interactions can strengthen effectiveness: The case of multi-stakeholder partnerships for renewable energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    8. repec:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i::p:15-25 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Vereno Brugiatelli, 2022. "The Shared Landscape. Strategies for Ethical and Democratic Living," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 8, January -.
    10. Thomas Hale & David Held & Kevin Young, 2013. "Gridlock: From Self-reinforcing Interdependence to Second-order Cooperation Problems," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 4(3), pages 223-235, September.
    11. Lasse Folke Henriksen & Stefano Ponte, 2018. "Public orchestration, social networks, and transnational environmental governance: Lessons from the aviation industry," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 23-45, March.
    12. Yixian Sun, 2017. "Transnational Public-Private Partnerships as Learning Facilitators: Global Governance of Mercury," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 17(2), pages 21-44, May.
    13. Thomas Hale & Charles Roger, 2014. "Orchestration and transnational climate governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 59-82, March.
    14. Junghwan Choi & Sangseop Lim, 2024. "Establishing a Marine Protected Area in the Waters Surrounding Dokdo: Necessity and Legality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    15. Alexander Ovodenko, 2016. "Governing Oligopolies: Global Regimes and Market Structure," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 16(3), pages 106-126, August.
    16. Eugenia C. Heldt & Thomas Dörfler, 2022. "Orchestrating private investors for development: How the World Bank revitalizes," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 1382-1398, October.
    17. Riikka Sievänen & John Sumelius & K. Islam & Mila Sell, 2013. "From struggle in responsible investment to potential to improve global environmental governance through UN PRI," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 197-217, May.
    18. Levänen, Jarkko O. & Hukkinen, Janne I., 2013. "A methodology for facilitating the feedback between mental models and institutional change in industrial ecosystem governance: A waste management case-study from northern Finland," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 15-23.
    19. Tana Johnson, 2013. "Looking beyond States: Openings for international bureaucrats to enter the institutional design process," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 499-519, December.
    20. Anne-Kathrin Weber, 2018. "The revival of the Honourable Merchant? Analysing private forest governance at firm level," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 619-634, August.
    21. Bernhard Reinsberg & Oliver Westerwinter, 2021. "The global governance of international development: Documenting the rise of multi-stakeholder partnerships and identifying underlying theoretical explanations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 59-94, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:156-:d:963736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.