IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v11y2020is1p28-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Capital and Liquidity in Bank Lending: Are Banks Safer?

Author

Listed:
  • Salvatore Polizzi
  • Enzo Scannella
  • Nuria Suárez

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine whether and to what extent bank capital requirements and liquidity standards influence the level of bank stability. Our approach is that both capital and liquidity affect lending growth, which in turn affects bank stability. We construct a panel dataset on a sample of 2,054 commercial banks from 117 developed and developing countries during the 2000–16 period. By applying a two‐stage least squares (2SLS) empirical methodology, our findings show that capital and liquidity have a negative direct impact on the level of bank stability. However, this influence is counteracted by an indirect positive effect through the increased level of credit. Our results are not homogeneous across legal and institutional environments. In particular, we provide evidence on more relevant relationships in countries with higher level of protection of creditor rights and lower restrictions on non‐traditional banking activities. Our empirical findings are robust to different specifications of the empirical model and to potential endogeneity problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Salvatore Polizzi & Enzo Scannella & Nuria Suárez, 2020. "The Role of Capital and Liquidity in Bank Lending: Are Banks Safer?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S1), pages 28-38, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:11:y:2020:i:s1:p:28-38
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12750
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.12750?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simona Galletta & Sebastiano Mazzù, 2023. "ESG controversies and bank risk taking," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 274-288, January.
    2. Jiang, Haiyun & Xu, Shulin & Cui, Jingwen & Subhani, Ghulam, 2023. "The impact of bank capital, liquidity and funding liquidity on sustainable bank lending: Evidence from MENA region," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 713-726.
    3. Ivica Klinac & Roberto Ercegovac & Mario Pecaric, 2021. "Post Crisis Banking Sector Regulation And European Union Economic Growth Nexus," Economic Review: Journal of Economics and Business, University of Tuzla, Faculty of Economics, vol. 19(2), pages 15-26, November.
    4. Kabundi, Alain & De Simone, Francisco Nadal, 2022. "Euro area banking and monetary policy shocks in the QE era," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    5. Isaac Ofoeda & Elikplimi Komla Agbloyor & Joshua Yindenaba Abor & Kofi Osei Achampong, 2022. "Foreign direct investment, anti‐money laundering regulations and economic growth," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(3), pages 670-692, April.
    6. Retselisitsoe I. Thamae & Nicholas M. Odhiambo, 2022. "The impact of bank regulation on bank lending: a review of international literature," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(4), pages 405-418, December.
    7. Anureet Virk Sidhu & Shailesh Rastogi & Rajani Gupte & Venkata Mrudula Bhimavarapu, 2022. "Impact of Liquidity Coverage Ratio on Performance of Select Indian Banks," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:11:y:2020:i:s1:p:28-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.