IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/eurcho/v24y2025i1p66-71.html

Building Sustainable Urban Futures: The Crucial Role of Urban Food Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandro Banterle
  • Fjona Zeneli

Abstract

Urban Food Policies are valuable instruments that cities use to address the multidimensional challenges of food security, food safety and sustainability in urban contexts. As urbanisation continues, these policies offer targeted solutions, involving coordinated efforts by city governments, civil society and stakeholders, and promoting local sustainability and resilience. They are implemented in four types, including substantive (e.g. schools’ canteens and food hubs), regulative (e.g. food safety and hygiene standards on street vendors), fiscal (e.g. tax on sugary beverages), and informative interventions (e.g. campaigns promoting sustainable food practices). As cities expand, they face important issues, such as food access disparities, rising malnutrition, environmental degradation and food waste accumulation. Urban Food Policies can go beyond traditional national policies, incorporating targeted interventions that address and account for the specific issues of urban life. The main key objectives are: ensuring food security and safety, preserving biodiversity and reducing pollution in urban and peri‐urban food systems, food waste management, healthy and sustainable diets, safeguarding cultural identity. However, their effectiveness depends on robust multi‐level governance, collaboration and political will, targeting the local objectives in line with Sustainable Development Goals. Urban Food Policies’ contribution can enable cities to address current and future food‐related challenges in a holistic way. Les politiques alimentaires urbaines sont des instruments intéressants que les villes utilisent pour relever les défis multidimensionnels de la sécurité alimentaire, de la sûreté alimentaire et de la durabilité dans les contextes urbains. À mesure que l'urbanisation se poursuit, ces politiques offrent des solutions ciblées, impliquant des efforts coordonnés des pouvoirs publics municipaux, de la société civile et des parties prenantes, et favorisant la durabilité et la résilience locales. Elles sont mises en œuvre sous quatre formes, à savoir des interventions de fond (par exemple, les cantines scolaires et les centres alimentaires), réglementaires (par exemple, les normes de sécurité alimentaire et d'hygiène pour les vendeurs ambulants), fiscales (par exemple, les taxes sur les boissons sucrées) et informatives (par exemple, les campagnes de promotion de pratiques alimentaires durables). À mesure que les villes s'étendent, elles sont confrontées à des problèmes importants, tels que les disparités d'accès à la nourriture, la malnutrition croissante, la dégradation de l'environnement et l'accumulation du gaspillage alimentaire. Les politiques alimentaires urbaines peuvent aller au‐delà des politiques nationales traditionnelles, en intégrant des interventions ciblées qui abordent et prennent en compte les problèmes spécifiques de la vie urbaine. Les principaux objectifs clés sont d'assurer la sécurité et la sûreté alimentaires, de préserver la biodiversité et réduire la pollution dans les systèmes alimentaires urbains et périurbains, de gérer le gaspillage alimentaire, de proposer des régimes alimentaires sains et durables et de sauvegarder l'identité culturelle. Toutefois, l'efficacité de ces politiques dépend d'une gouvernance multi‐niveaux solide, de la collaboration et de la volonté politique, visant des objectifs locaux conformes aux objectifs de développement durable. La contribution des politiques alimentaires urbaines peut permettre aux villes de relever les défis actuels et futurs liés à l'alimentation de manière holistique. Städtische Ernährungspolitik ist ein wertvolles Instrument, mit dem die Städte die multidimensionalen Herausforderungen der Ernährungssicherheit, der Lebensmittelsicherheit und der Nachhaltigkeit in städtischen Kontexten angehen können. Angesichts der fortschreitenden Urbanisierung bieten diese Maßnahmen gezielte Lösungen, die koordinierte Anstrengungen der Stadtverwaltungen, der Zivilgesellschaft und der Interessengruppen umfassen und die lokale Nachhaltigkeit und Widerstandsfähigkeit fördern. Es gibt vier Arten von Maßnahmen: materielle (z. B. Schulkantinen und Lebensmittelzentren), regulative (z. B. Lebensmittelsicherheits‐ und Hygienestandards für Straßenverkäufer), steuerliche (z. B. Steuern auf zuckerhaltige Getränke) und informative Maßnahmen (z. B. Kampagnen zur Förderung nachhaltiger Lebensmittelpraktiken). In dem Maße, wie die Städte wachsen, werden sie mit wichtigen Problemen konfrontiert, wie z. B. ungleicher Zugang zu Lebensmitteln, zunehmende Unterernährung, Umweltzerstörung und Anhäufung von Lebensmittelabfällen. Die städtische Ernährungspolitik kann über die traditionelle nationale Politik hinausgehen und gezielte Maßnahmen umfassen, die auf die spezifischen Probleme des städtischen Lebens eingehen und diese berücksichtigen. Die wichtigsten Ziele sind: Gewährleistung der Lebensmittelsicherheit, Erhaltung der biologischen Vielfalt und Verringerung der Umweltverschmutzung in städtischen und stadtnahen Ernährungssystemen, Bewirtschaftung von Lebensmittelabfällen, gesunde und nachhaltige Ernährung und Wahrung der kulturellen Identität. Ihre Wirksamkeit hängt jedoch von einer soliden Multi‐Level‐Governance, der Zusammenarbeit und dem politischen Willen ab, die lokalen Ziele im Einklang mit den Zielen für nachhaltige Entwicklung zu verfolgen. Der Beitrag der städtischen Ernährungspolitik kann die Städte in die Lage versetzen, aktuelle und künftige ernährungsbezogene Herausforderungen ganzheitlich anzugehen.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandro Banterle & Fjona Zeneli, 2025. "Building Sustainable Urban Futures: The Crucial Role of Urban Food Policy," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 24(1), pages 66-71, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:24:y:2025:i:1:p:66-71
    DOI: 10.1111/1746-692X.12463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12463
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1746-692X.12463?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Celia Burgaz & Vanessa Gorasso & Wouter M. J. Achten & Carolina Batis & Luciana Castronuovo & Adama Diouf & Gershim Asiki & Boyd A. Swinburn & Mishel Unar-Munguía & Brecht Devleesschauwer & Gary Sacks, 2023. "The effectiveness of food system policies to improve nutrition, nutrition-related inequalities and environmental sustainability: a scoping review," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(5), pages 1313-1344, October.
    2. Candel, Jeroen J.L. & Pereira, Laura, 2017. "Towards integrated food policy: Main challenges and steps ahead," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 89-92.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marijn Faling & Robbert Biesbroek, 2019. "Cross-boundary policy entrepreneurship for climate-smart agriculture in Kenya," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(4), pages 525-547, December.
    2. Robbert Biesbroek & Jeroen J. L. Candel, 2020. "Mechanisms for policy (dis)integration: explaining food policy and climate change adaptation policy in the Netherlands," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(1), pages 61-84, March.
    3. Durrant, Rachael & Ely, Adrian, 2022. "Deliberative-analytic approaches to Ecosystem Services as a way forward for the land sparing/sharing debate," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    4. Stefan C. Dekker & Aletta D. Kraneveld & Jerry van Dijk & Agni Kalfagianni & Andre C. Knulst & Herman Lelieveldt & Ellen H. M. Moors & Eggo Müller & Raymond H. H. Pieters & Corné M. J. Pieterse & Step, 2020. "Towards Healthy Planet Diets—A Transdisciplinary Approach to Food Sustainability Challenges," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Naylor, Rosamond & Fang, Safari & Fanzo, Jessica, 2023. "A global view of aquaculture policy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    6. Salgado, Juan Carlos & Jayaraman, Bhairavi & Taillie, Lindsey Smith & Ng, Shu Wen, 2025. "Firm’s responses to food policies to reduce consumption of ultra-processed food and beverages: lessons from the existing evidence," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    7. Kelly Parsons & David Barling, 2022. "England’s food policy coordination and the Covid-19 response," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(4), pages 1027-1043, August.
    8. Amber van den Akker & Alice Fabbri & Scott Slater & Anna B. Gilmore & Cecile Knai & Harry Rutter, 2024. "Mapping actor networks in global multi-stakeholder initiatives for food system transformation," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 16(5), pages 1223-1234, October.
    9. Jana Baldy, 2019. "Framing a Sustainable Local Food System—How Smaller Cities in Southern Germany Are Facing a New Policy Issue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, March.
    10. Jianbo Han & Edwin Hon Wan Chan & Queena Kun Qian & Esther Hiu Kwan Yung, 2021. "Achieving Sustainable Urban Development with an Ageing Population: An “Age-Friendly City and Community” Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-32, August.
    11. Charlie F. Thompson & Jani Selin & Jenny Cisneros Örnberg, 2025. "Investigating policy coherence through policy strategies: a comparative analysis of Nordic gambling policies," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 58(3), pages 425-447, September.
    12. Nie Changhong & Cui Mingming & Li Xiuting, 2020. "Grain Science and Technology Policies and Food Security in China: An Empirical Study Based on a Provincial Dynamic Panel Model," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 8(6), pages 504-523, December.
    13. Bethânia Ávila Rodrigues & Mariana Machado Fidelis Nascimento & Juliana Vitória Messias Bittencourt, 2021. "Mapping of the behavior of scientific publications since the decade of 1990 until the present day in the field of food and nutrition security," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(3), pages 2459-2483, March.
    14. Hendriks, Sheryl L., 2018. "Food policy and nutrition economics in the SDG era," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 57(3-4), June.
    15. Jeanne Pahun & Eve Fouilleux, 2022. "Organisational troubles in policy integration. French local food policies in the making," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 103(3), pages 247-269, September.
    16. Francesca Galli & Aniek Hebinck & Brídín Carroll, 2018. "Addressing food poverty in systems: governance of food assistance in three European countries," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(6), pages 1353-1370, December.
    17. Nína M. Saviolidis & Gudrun Olafsdottir & Mariana Nicolau & Antonella Samoggia & Elise Huber & Laura Brimont & Matthew Gorton & David von Berlepsch & Hildigunnur Sigurdardottir & Margherita Del Prete , 2020. "Stakeholder Perceptions of Policy Tools in Support of Sustainable Food Consumption in Europe: Policy Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-24, September.
    18. Namugumya, Brenda Shenute & Candel, Jeroen J.L. & Talsma, Elise F. & Termeer, Catrien J.A.M., 2020. "A mechanisms-based explanation of nutrition policy (dis)integration processes in Uganda," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    19. Dori Patay & Holly Rippin & Gastón Ares & Erica Reeve & Carolina Venegas Hargous & Penny Farrell & Belinda Reeve & Jose‐Luis Vivero‐Pol & Anne Marie Thow, 2026. "From Ministries of Food to National Food System Committees: A Global Mapping and Typology of Multisectoral Food System Governance Institutions," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 1378-1398, February.
    20. Jeroen J. L. Candel, 2022. "Power to the people? Food democracy initiatives’ contributions to democratic goods," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1477-1489, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:24:y:2025:i:1:p:66-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.