IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecorec/v51y1975i2p253-255.html

Economic Hypotheses and the Derivation of Production Functions: A Comment

Author

Listed:
  • J. Kirker Stephens
  • Rothwell Stephens

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Kirker Stephens & Rothwell Stephens, 1975. "Economic Hypotheses and the Derivation of Production Functions: A Comment," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 51(2), pages 253-255, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:51:y:1975:i:2:p:253-255
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.1975.tb00244.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1975.tb00244.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1975.tb00244.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:bla:ecorec:v:49:y:1973:i:127:p:456-63 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. A. Zellner & N. S. Revankar, 1969. "Generalized Production Functions," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 36(2), pages 241-250.
    3. Herbert H. Tsang, 1973. "Economic Hypotheses and the Derivation of Production Functions," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 49(3), pages 456-463, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Colling, Benjamin & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2016. "Goodness-of-fit tests in semiparametric transformation models using the integrated regression function," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2016031, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    2. Basurto Hernandez, Saul & Maddison, David & Banerjee, Anindya, "undated". "The effect of PROCAMPO on farms’ technical efficiency: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274376, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Mellander, Erik, 1991. "An Indirect Approach to Measuring Productivity in Private Services," Working Paper Series 300, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised Mar 1992.
    4. Javier Barbero & Ernesto Rodríguez-Crespo, 2022. "Technological, institutional, and geographical peripheries: regional development and risk of poverty in the European regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 69(2), pages 311-332, October.
    5. Hang Ryu, 2009. "Economic assumptions and choice of functional forms: comparison of top down and bottom up approaches," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 55-62, August.
    6. Swati Mukerjee & Ann Dryden Witte, 1992. "Measurement of Output and Quality Adjustment in the Day-care Industry," NBER Chapters, in: Output Measurement in the Service Sectors, pages 343-369, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Dae-Hwan Kim & Matarr O. Sambou & Moo-Sup Jung, 2016. "Does Technology Transfer Help Small and Medium Companies? Empirical Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-13, November.
    8. Peter E. Rossi, 1984. "Stochastic Specification of Cost and Production Relationships," Discussion Papers 616, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    9. Vanhems, Anne & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2019. "Estimation Of A Semiparametric Transformation Model In The Presence Of Endogeneity," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 73-110, February.
    10. Michael Panik, 2000. "Estimating global returns to scale with a cone-homogeneous production function: some cross-section results," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(14), pages 1787-1791.
    11. Bella, Giovanni & Mattana, Paolo, 2014. "Global indeterminacy of the equilibrium in the Chamley model of endogenous growth in the vicinity of a Bogdanov–Takens bifurcation," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 69-79.
    12. Kloodt, Nick & Neumeyer, Natalie, 2020. "Specification tests in semiparametric transformation models — A multiplier bootstrap approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    13. King, Robert P. & Park, Timothy A., 2002. "Modeling Scale Economies In Supermarket Operations: Incorporating The Impacts Of Store Characteristics And Information Technologies," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19881, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Orea, Luis, 2019. "The Econometric Measurement of Firms’ Efficiency," Efficiency Series Papers 2019/02, University of Oviedo, Department of Economics, Oviedo Efficiency Group (OEG).
    15. McDonald, John & Snooks, G. D., 1986. "Domesday Economy: A New Approach to Anglo-Norman History," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198285243.
    16. SK Mishra, 2007. "Estimation of Zellner-Revankar Production Function Revisited," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 3(14), pages 1-7.
    17. Millan, Joaquin, 2004. "Scale and the Efficiency Production Function," Efficiency Series Papers 2004/02, University of Oviedo, Department of Economics, Oviedo Efficiency Group (OEG).
    18. Constantin Chilarescu, 2019. "A Production Function with Variable Elasticity of Factor Substitution," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(4), pages 2343-2360.
    19. Robert E. Kohn & Gjermund Vaage, 1998. "Factor Dominance and Long-Run Equilibrium Scale," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 65-71, March.
    20. Sakouvogui Kekoura & Shaik Saleem & Doetkott Curt & Magel Rhonda, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis of stochastic frontier analysis models," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 27(1), pages 71-90, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:51:y:1975:i:2:p:253-255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esausea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.