IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecopol/v38y2026i2p460-472.html

Green Credit and ESG Performance in Construction Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Yongmin Zhang
  • Keyu Chen
  • Yingxue Zhao
  • Wenjun Tu

Abstract

Against the backdrop of escalating global environmental challenges, green finance has gained prominence as a critical instrument for advancing sustainability. This study investigates the impact and mechanisms of green credit policies on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance of construction companies. Using a sample of Chinese A‐share listed firms from 2009 to 2023 and employing a Propensity Score Matching–Difference‐in‐Differences approach, the findings reveal that green credit significantly enhances the overall ESG scores of construction enterprises, primarily through green technology innovation and charitable activities. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the policy effect is stronger in civil engineering and building construction, but limited in decoration and installation sectors. Firms in eastern China respond more strongly than those in central and western regions. The study recommends that enterprises optimize green innovation and social responsibility investments, while policymakers should strengthen regional coordination and adopt sector‐specific incentive measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongmin Zhang & Keyu Chen & Yingxue Zhao & Wenjun Tu, 2026. "Green Credit and ESG Performance in Construction Enterprises," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 460-472, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:38:y:2026:i:2:p:460-472
    DOI: 10.1111/ecpo.70034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.70034
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecpo.70034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:38:y:2026:i:2:p:460-472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0954-1985 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.