IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/deveco/v58y2020i4p276-300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political Elite in Contemporary Vietnam: The Origin and Evolution of the Dominant Stratum

Author

Listed:
  • Futaba Ishizuka

Abstract

Michael Voslensky's concept of nomenklatura has three main features: comprehensive state authority, monopoly of wealth, and a hierarchical personnel system. Such features were found in party‐state leaders in pre‐reform Vietnam. In the doi moi period, the environment in which party‐state leaders operate has changed greatly, but ambiguities remain under the names of the socialist‐oriented market economy and socialist law‐governed state. With the party‐state personnel system essentially unchanged from the pre‐reform period, party‐state leaders have taken advantage of the ambiguous nature of such reforms and consolidated their dominant position in society through acts of corruption and nepotism. The intensive anti‐corruption drive by the 12th tenure party leadership dealt a blow to those who committed such deviations. Nevertheless, it did not fundamentally change the situation of political elite dominance, as it aimed to strengthen the concentration of decision‐making power and added more requirements for would‐be officeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Futaba Ishizuka, 2020. "Political Elite in Contemporary Vietnam: The Origin and Evolution of the Dominant Stratum," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 58(4), pages 276-300, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:deveco:v:58:y:2020:i:4:p:276-300
    DOI: 10.1111/deve.12255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/deve.12255
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/deve.12255?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diep Phan & Ian Coxhead, 2020. "Persistent Privilege? Institutional Education Gaps during Vietnam's Economic Boom," Working Papers 2020-023, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    2. Markussen, Thomas & Ngo, Quang-Thanh, 2019. "Economic and non-economic returns to communist party membership in Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 370-384.
    3. Ian Coxhead & Diep Phan, 2013. "Princelings and Paupers? State Employment and the Distribution of Human Capital Investments Among Households in Viet Nam," Asian Development Review, MIT Press, vol. 30(2), pages 26-48, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ian Coxhead & Rashesh Shrestha, 2017. "Globalization and School–Work Choices in an Emerging Economy: Vietnam," Asian Economic Papers, MIT Press, vol. 16(2), pages 28-45, Summer.
    2. Jaax, Alexander, 2020. "Private sector development and provincial patterns of poverty: Evidence from Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    3. Thang Dang, 2018. "Do the more educated utilize more health care services? Evidence from Vietnam using a regression discontinuity design," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 277-299, September.
    4. Diep Phan & Ian Coxhead, 2020. "Persistent Privilege? Institutional Education Gaps during Vietnam's Economic Boom," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 58(4), pages 332-359, December.
    5. Markussen, Thomas & Ngo, Quang-Thanh, 2019. "Economic and non-economic returns to communist party membership in Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 370-384.
    6. Emi Kojin, 2020. "Diversifying Factors of Income Inequality in the Rural Mekong Delta: Evidence of Commune‐Level Heterogeneity," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 58(4), pages 360-391, December.
    7. Diep Phan & Ian Coxhead, 2020. "Persistent Privilege? Institutional Education Gaps during Vietnam's Economic Boom," Working Papers 2020-023, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    8. Tinh Doan & Quan Le & Tuyen Quang Tran, 2018. "Lost in Transition? Declining Returns to Education in Vietnam," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 30(2), pages 195-216, April.
    9. Emi Kojin & Ian Coxhead, 2020. "Introduction to the Special Issue on Pathways to Prosperity in Vietnam: Structural and Transitional Inequality in the Distribution of Opportunity," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 58(4), pages 267-275, December.
    10. Trinh, Trong-Anh & Feeny, Simon & Posso, Alberto, 2022. "Political connections and post-disaster assistance in rural Vietnam," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    11. Ian Coxhead & Nguyen Dinh Tuan Vuong, 2023. "Does the Skill Premium Influence Educational Decisions? Evidence from Viet Nam," Working Papers DP-2023-03, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    12. Phan, Van-Phuc, 2023. "Is the internet penetration pro-poor? Evidence from a panel data analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8).
    13. Dai Binh Tran & Sasiwimon Warunsiri Paweenawat, 2023. "The returns to education and wage penalty from overeducation: New evidence from Vietnam," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(4), pages 1267-1290, October.
    14. Ngo, Thanh Quang & Luu, Khai Duc & Nguyen, Danh Ngọc & Bui, Thanh Xuan & Van, Sang Nguyen & Nguyen, Ky Tran, 2022. "Effects of Land Quality on Land Use: Farm-level Panel-data Evidence from Viet Nam," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 14(4), December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:deveco:v:58:y:2020:i:4:p:276-300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/idegvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.