IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i3p4171-4188.html

Exploring Heterogeneous Forms of SDG Washing in the Strategic Integration of Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Korber
  • Grigorij Ljubownikow
  • Lisa Callagher
  • Hanoku Bathula

Abstract

This study examines how New Zealand higher education institutions (HEIs) strategically integrate sustainable development in teaching and learning, and to what extent commitments are reflected in organisational components. We identify five distinct forms of sustainable development misalignment based on an analysis of 171 strategic documents from all eight New Zealand universities and 17,401 course outlines offered in 2022. Structural misalignment arises when structural changes, such as tailored policies or formal responsibilities, do not align with strategic priorities. Capacity misalignment occurs when sufficient resources and capabilities do not accompany changes in formal structures. Scope and scale misalignments signify cases where comprehensive commitments to a broad range of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) at the organisational level are not reflected at the instructional level, such as in programme and course descriptions. Instructional SDG misalignment occurs when instructional‐level goals captured in course descriptions are disconnected from key course design components (e.g., learning outcomes) that drive day‐to‐day learning. By integrating literature on decoupling and constructive alignment theory, we theorise how these misalignments resemble various forms of ‘SDG‐washing’ and undermine organisational contributions to sustainable development. We advance research at the intersection of strategy and corporate sustainability by providing a nuanced understanding of different manifestations of SDG‐washing and their implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Korber & Grigorij Ljubownikow & Lisa Callagher & Hanoku Bathula, 2026. "Exploring Heterogeneous Forms of SDG Washing in the Strategic Integration of Sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 4171-4188, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:4171-4188
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70377
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70377?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ester Clementino & Richard Perkins, 2021. "How Do Companies Respond to Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) ratings? Evidence from Italy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(2), pages 379-397, June.
    2. Dolors Setó-Pamies & Eleni Papaoikonomou, 2016. "A Multi-level Perspective for the Integration of Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability (ECSRS) in Management Education," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(3), pages 523-538, July.
    3. Barbara Galleli & Lucas Amaral, 2025. "Bridging Institutional Theory and Social and Environmental Efforts in Management: A Review and Research Agenda," Post-Print hal-05114256, HAL.
    4. Mollie Painter & Sareh Pouryousefi & Sally Hibbert & Jo-Anna Russon, 2019. "Sharing Vocabularies: Towards Horizontal Alignment of Values-Driven Business Functions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 965-979, April.
    5. Steffen Böhm & Michal Carrington & Nelarine Cornelius & Boudewijn Bruin & Michelle Greenwood & Louise Hassan & Tanusree Jain & Charlotte Karam & Arno Kourula & Laurence Romani & Suhaib Riaz & Deirdre , 2022. "Ethics at the Centre of Global and Local Challenges: Thoughts on the Future of Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(3), pages 835-861, October.
    6. Mollie Painter-Morland & Ehsan Sabet & Petra Molthan-Hill & Helen Goworek & Sander Leeuw, 2016. "Beyond the Curriculum: Integrating Sustainability into Business Schools," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(4), pages 737-754, December.
    7. Iñaki Heras‐Saizarbitoria & Laida Urbieta & Olivier Boiral, 2022. "Organizations' engagement with sustainable development goals: From cherry‐picking to SDG‐washing?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 316-328, March.
    8. Eva Collins & Juliet Roper & Stewart Lawrence, 2010. "Sustainability practices: trends in New Zealand businesses," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(8), pages 479-494, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berina Jaganjac & Line M. Abrahamsen & Torunn S. Olsen & John A. Hunnes, 2024. "Is It Time to Reclaim the ‘Ethics’ in Business Ethics Education?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Thomas, Manoj T., 2018. "Developing a capstone course on ecological and social sustainability in business education," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 949-958.
    3. Justo Alberto Ramírez‐Franco & Raquel Antolín‐López & Iván Montiel, 2025. "Socialization of Prospective Practitioners Towards Pro‐Sustainability Business Attitudes: The Business Curriculum and Social Referents," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(5), pages 6088-6105, September.
    4. Oehler, Andreas & Neuss, Charlotte, 2025. "ESG disclosure vs. ESG ratings: Consistent information value?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    5. Olivier Boiral & Marie‐Christine Brotherton & Léo Rivaud & David Talbot, 2022. "Comparing the uncomparable? An investigation of car manufacturers' climate performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2213-2229, July.
    6. Scholz, Robert, 2023. "Unternehmensmitbestimmung und die sozialökologische Transformation: Zusammenhang zwischen Mitbestimmungsindex und ESG-Kriterien in börsennotierten Unternehmen," Mitbestimmungsreport 79, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    7. Lutz Preuss & Heather Elms & Roman Kurdyukov & Urša Golob & Rodica Milena Zaharia & Borna Jalsenjak & Ryan Burg & Peter Hardi & Julija Jacquemod & Mari Kooskora & Siarhei Manzhynski & Tetiana Mostensk, 2023. "Institutional pressures and the adoption of responsible management education at universities and business schools in Central and Eastern Europe," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 1575-1591, October.
    8. H. L. Zou & R. C. Zeng & S. X. Zeng & Jonathan J. Shi, 2015. "How Do Environmental Violation Events Harm Corporate Reputation?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(8), pages 836-854, December.
    9. Gaston Fornes & Abel Monfort & Camelia Ilie & Chun Kwong (Tony) Koo & Guillermo Cardoza, 2019. "Ethics, Responsibility, and Sustainability in MBAs. Understanding the Motivations for the Incorporation of ERS in Less Traditional Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Massimo Arnone & Carlo Drago & Alberto Costantiello & Angelo Leogrande, 2025. "Political Trust in Italy: How Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors Shape Confidence in Parties," Working Papers hal-04920996, HAL.
    11. Yang, Xinhui & Wang, Chih-Wei & Zhang, Jie & Lin, Weizheng, 2025. "Hometown CEOs and greenwashing: From the perspective of energy consumption," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 826-838.
    12. Guosong Wang & Huizhen Zhang, 2025. "FinTech-Driven Corporate Sustainability: A Technology–Organization–Environment Framework Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-28, September.
    13. Dinna Charisma & Bambang Hermanto & Margo Purnomo & Tetty Herawati & Anne Charina, 2025. "Sustainable Business Through Local Strength: A Qualitative Study of Financial, Social, and Cultural Strategies in Bandung’s Culinary Micro-Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-27, May.
    14. Juan Oliveros Fontaine & Cristina del Campo & Elena Urquía-Grande, 2024. "What Are Investors Most Interested in about Sustainability? An Approach from the Scientific Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-23, April.
    15. Po‐Sheng Yang & Jin‐Li Hu, 2026. "Intersections Between Digital Innovation and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence From Listed Electronics Companies in Taiwan," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 2705-2736, March.
    16. Claus Dierksmeier, 2020. "From Jensen to Jensen: Mechanistic Management Education or Humanistic Management Learning?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 73-87, September.
    17. Tu, Qiang & Zuo, Limei & Liang, Anran & Yao, Ye & Liu, Diyi, 2025. "Does ESG rating divergence decrease enterprise productivity? Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(PB).
    18. Marius Banke & Stephanie Lenger & Christiane Pott, 2022. "ESG Ratings in the Corporate Reporting of DAX40 Companies in Germany: Effects on Market Participants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, August.
    19. Edna Aparecida Greggio Possebon & Felippe Aparecido Cippiciani & José Roberto Ferreira Savoia & Frédéric de Mariz, 2024. "ESG Scores and Performance in Brazilian Public Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Weihong Chen & David Diwei Lv & Christina W. Y. Wong, 2023. "Corporate environmental efforts, government environmental subsidies, and corporate non‐environmental R&D intensity: Evidence from listed firms," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 1321-1333, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:4171-4188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.