IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v12y2003i3p147-162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning eco‐industrial parks: an analysis of Dutch planning methods

Author

Listed:
  • Marcus G. van Leeuwen
  • Walter J. V. Vermeulen
  • Pieter Glasbergen

Abstract

In theory, eco‐industrial parks can make significant improvements in the environment. In that light, this article analyses six planning methods currently in use in the Netherlands. The most salient findings are that these methods lack an explicit vision of sustainability, they do not give due consideration to symbiotic or utility‐sharing options, they do not sufficiently engage the companies involved in the development and their policy instruments have a limited environmental impact. The planning methods prove to have many shortcomings: the definition of sustainability is unclear; there are no quantitative standards; information on symbiosis and utility sharing is inadequate; the economic and organizational implications are largely ignored and the environmental impact is insufficiently monitored. However, eco‐industrial parks can only have greater environmental benefits through symbiosis and utility sharing. Therefore, location‐ and company‐specific factors have to be taken into consideration. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. and ERP Environment

Suggested Citation

  • Marcus G. van Leeuwen & Walter J. V. Vermeulen & Pieter Glasbergen, 2003. "Planning eco‐industrial parks: an analysis of Dutch planning methods," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 147-162, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:12:y:2003:i:3:p:147-162
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.355
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.355?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Ehrenfeld & Nicholas Gertler, 1997. "Industrial Ecology in Practice: The Evolution of Interdependence at Kalundborg," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 1(1), pages 67-79, January.
    2. Bryna Cosgriff Dunn & Anne Steinemann, 1998. "Industrial Ecology for Sustainable Communities," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(6), pages 661-672.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Piotr Maśloch & Grzegorz Maśloch & Łukasz Kuźmiński & Henryk Wojtaszek & Ireneusz Miciuła, 2020. "Autonomous Energy Regions as a Proposed Choice of Selecting Selected EU Regions—Aspects of Their Creation and Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-27, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heungsoon Kim, 2007. "Building an eco-industrial park as a public project in South Korea. The stakeholders' understanding of and involvement in the project," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(6), pages 357-369.
    2. Cecilia Haskins, 2006. "Multidisciplinary investigation of eco‐industrial parks," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(4), pages 313-330, December.
    3. Colton Brehm & Astrid Layton, 2021. "Nestedness of eco‐industrial networks: Exploring linkage distribution to promote sustainable industrial growth," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(1), pages 205-218, February.
    4. Deishin Lee, 2012. "Turning Waste into By-Product," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 115-127, January.
    5. Korhonen, Jouni & Snakin, Juha-Pekka, 2005. "Analysing the evolution of industrial ecosystems: concepts and application," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 169-186, January.
    6. Ghodeswar, Archana & Oliver, Matthew E., 2022. "Trading one waste for another? Unintended consequences of fly ash reuse in the Indian electric power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    7. Stanislav Shmelev & Harrison Roger Brook, 2021. "Macro Sustainability across Countries: Key Sector Environmentally Extended Input-Output Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-46, October.
    8. Michael Ross Jayne, 2001. "Managing environmental risk in existing light industrial estates," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(6), pages 365-382, November.
    9. Andrea Cecchin & Roberta Salomone & Pauline Deutz & Andrea Raggi & Laura Cutaia, 2021. "What Is in a Name? The Rising Star of the Circular Economy as a Resource-Related Concept for Sustainable Development," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    10. Chembessi Chedrak & Gohoungodji Paulin & Juste Rajaonson, 2023. "“A fine wine, better with age”: Circular economy historical roots and influential publications: A bibliometric analysis using Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS)," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(6), pages 1593-1612, December.
    11. Taskhiri, Mohammad Sadegh & Tan, Raymond R. & Chiu, Anthony S.F., 2011. "Emergy-based fuzzy optimization approach for water reuse in an eco-industrial park," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 730-737.
    12. Knud Sinding, 2000. "Environmental management beyond the boundaries of the firm: definitions and constraints," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(2), pages 79-91, March.
    13. Bertha Maya Sopha & Annik Magerholm Fet & Martina Maria Keitsch & Cecilia Haskins, 2010. "Using systems engineering to create a framework for evaluating industrial symbiosis options," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 149-160, June.
    14. Maria Claudia Lucchetti & Gabriella Arcese, 2014. "Tourism Management and Industrial Ecology: A Theoretical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-10, August.
    15. Florian Lüdeke‐Freund & Stefan Gold & Nancy M. P. Bocken, 2019. "A Review and Typology of Circular Economy Business Model Patterns," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 36-61, February.
    16. Mulder, Karel & Kaijser, Arne, 2014. "The dynamics of technological systems integration: Water management, electricity supply, railroads and industrialization at the Göta Älv," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 88-99.
    17. Emilia Faria & Cristiane Barreto & Armando Caldeira-Pires & Jorge Alfredo Cerqueira Streit & Patricia Guarnieri, 2023. "Brazilian Circular Economy Pilot Project: Integrating Local Stakeholders’ Perception and Social Context in Industrial Symbiosis Analyses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-28, February.
    18. Frank Birkin, 2001. "Steps to natural capitalism," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(1), pages 47-57.
    19. Ayres, Robert U., 2004. "On the life cycle metaphor: where ecology and economics diverge," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 425-438, April.
    20. repec:aud:audfin:v:20:y:2018:i:48:p:278 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. David Gibbs, 2003. "Trust and Networking in Inter-firm Relations: the Case of Eco-industrial Development," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 18(3), pages 222-236, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:12:y:2003:i:3:p:147-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.