IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/brjirl/v28y1990i1p1-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Root Metaphor in the Old and New Industrial Relations

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Dunn

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Dunn, 1990. "Root Metaphor in the Old and New Industrial Relations," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 28(1), pages 1-31, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:28:y:1990:i:1:p:1-31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-8543.1990.tb00350.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Purcell, 1981. "Good Industrial Relations," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-07101-2.
    2. John Purcell, 1981. "Good Industrial Relations," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-04503-7.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anne-Marie Greene & Peter Ackers & John Black, 2001. "Lost Narratives? From Paternalism to Team-Working in a Lock Manufacturing Firm," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 22(2), pages 211-237, May.
    2. Panagiotopoulos, Miltiadis, 2005. "The Evolution of Trade Unions in Britain," MPRA Paper 4290, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2007.
    3. Stephen Dunn, 1993. "From Donovan to … Wherever," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 31(2), pages 169-187, June.
    4. Stephen Dunn & Martyn Wright, 1994. "Maintaining the ‘Status Quo’? An Analysis of the Contents of British Collective Agreements, 1979–1990," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 32(1), pages 23-46, March.
    5. Vincent Pasquier & Thibault Daudigeos & Marcos Barros, 2020. "Towards a New Flashmob Unionism: The Case of the Fight for 15 Movement," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 58(2), pages 336-363, June.
    6. Dimitrov, Kiril, 2019. "Human resource management in business organizations under exponential growth conditions," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 15(1).
    7. Amernic, Joel & Craig, Russell, 2017. "CEO speeches and safety culture: British Petroleum before the Deepwater Horizon disaster," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 61-80.
    8. Rachel Bailey, 1994. "Annual Review Article 1993: British Public Sector Industrial Relations," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 32(1), pages 113-136, March.
    9. Richard Hyman, 1994. "Theory and Industrial Relations," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 32(2), pages 165-180, June.
    10. Stephen Dunn, 1991. "Root Metaphor in Industrial Relations: A Reply to Tom Keenoy," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 29(2), pages 329-336, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emma Hughes & Tony Dobbins, 2021. "Frontier of control struggles in British and Irish public transport," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 27(3), pages 327-344, September.
    2. CemalIyem CemalIyem, 2013. "HRM vs Industrial Relations: a Comparative and Theoretical Evaluation of Two Disciplines," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 4(4), pages 185-192.
    3. Richard Hyman, 1987. "Strategy or Structure? Capital, Labour and Control," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 1(1), pages 25-55, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:28:y:1990:i:1:p:1-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.