IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v79y2023i3p2489-2502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian sample size calculations for comparing two strategies in SMART studies

Author

Listed:
  • Armando Turchetta
  • Erica E. M. Moodie
  • David A. Stephens
  • Sylvie D. Lambert

Abstract

In the management of most chronic conditions characterized by the lack of universally effective treatments, adaptive treatment strategies (ATSs) have grown in popularity as they offer a more individualized approach. As a result, sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMARTs) have gained attention as the most suitable clinical trial design to formalize the study of these strategies. While the number of SMARTs has increased in recent years, sample size and design considerations have generally been carried out in frequentist settings. However, standard frequentist formulae require assumptions on interim response rates and variance components. Misspecifying these can lead to incorrect sample size calculations and correspondingly inadequate levels of power. The Bayesian framework offers a straightforward path to alleviate some of these concerns. In this paper, we provide calculations in a Bayesian setting to allow more realistic and robust estimates that account for uncertainty in inputs through the ‘two priors’ approach. Additionally, compared to the standard frequentist formulae, this methodology allows us to rely on fewer assumptions, integrate pre‐trial knowledge, and switch the focus from the standardized effect size to the MDD. The proposed methodology is evaluated in a thorough simulation study and is implemented to estimate the sample size for a full‐scale SMART of an internet‐based adaptive stress management intervention on cardiovascular disease patients using data from its pilot study conducted in two Canadian provinces.

Suggested Citation

  • Armando Turchetta & Erica E. M. Moodie & David A. Stephens & Sylvie D. Lambert, 2023. "Bayesian sample size calculations for comparing two strategies in SMART studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2489-2502, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:79:y:2023:i:3:p:2489-2502
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13813
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13813?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P. W. Lavori & R. Dawson, 2000. "A design for testing clinical strategies: biased adaptive within‐subject randomization," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 163(1), pages 29-38.
    2. Pierpaolo Brutti & Fulvio Santis & Stefania Gubbiotti, 2014. "Bayesian-frequentist sample size determination: a game of two priors," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 72(2), pages 133-151, August.
    3. De Santis, Fulvio, 2006. "Sample Size Determination for Robust Bayesian Analysis," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 278-291, March.
    4. Lu Wang & Andrea Rotnitzky & Xihong Lin & Randall E. Millikan & Peter F. Thall, 2012. "Evaluation of Viable Dynamic Treatment Regimes in a Sequentially Randomized Trial of Advanced Prostate Cancer," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(498), pages 493-508, June.
    5. S. K. Sahu & T. M. F. Smith, 2006. "A Bayesian method of sample size determination with practical applications," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(2), pages 235-253, March.
    6. Kelley M. Kidwell & Nicholas J. Seewald & Qui Tran & Connie Kasari & Daniel Almirall, 2018. "Design and analysis considerations for comparing dynamic treatment regimens with binary outcomes from sequential multiple assignment randomized trials," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(9), pages 1628-1651, July.
    7. Kevin Kunzmann & Michael J. Grayling & Kim May Lee & David S. Robertson & Kaspar Rufibach & James M. S. Wason, 2021. "A Review of Bayesian Perspectives on Sample Size Derivation for Confirmatory Trials," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 75(4), pages 424-432, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fulvio De Santis & Stefania Gubbiotti, 2021. "On the predictive performance of a non-optimal action in hypothesis testing," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(2), pages 689-709, June.
    2. Ali Karimnezhad & Ahmad Parsian, 2018. "Most stable sample size determination in clinical trials," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 27(3), pages 437-454, August.
    3. Jörg Martin & Clemens Elster, 2021. "The variation of the posterior variance and Bayesian sample size determination," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(4), pages 1135-1155, October.
    4. Pierpaolo Brutti & Fulvio Santis & Stefania Gubbiotti, 2014. "Bayesian-frequentist sample size determination: a game of two priors," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 72(2), pages 133-151, August.
    5. Fulvio De Santis & Stefania Gubbiotti, 2021. "Sample Size Requirements for Calibrated Approximate Credible Intervals for Proportions in Clinical Trials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-11, January.
    6. Jin Wang & Donglin Zeng & D. Y. Lin, 2022. "Semiparametric single-index models for optimal treatment regimens with censored outcomes," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 744-763, October.
    7. Early Kirstin & Mankoff Jennifer & Fienberg Stephen E., 2017. "Dynamic Question Ordering in Online Surveys," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 33(3), pages 625-657, September.
    8. Thomas A. Murray & Peter F. Thall & Ying Yuan & Sarah McAvoy & Daniel R. Gomez, 2017. "Robust Treatment Comparison Based on Utilities of Semi-Competing Risks in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(517), pages 11-23, January.
    9. Hui Quan & Xiaofei Chen & Xun Chen & Xiaodong Luo, 2022. "Assessments of Conditional and Unconditional Type I Error Probabilities for Bayesian Hypothesis Testing with Historical Data Borrowing," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 14(1), pages 139-157, April.
    10. Markus Frölich & Martin Huber, 2014. "Treatment Evaluation With Multiple Outcome Periods Under Endogeneity and Attrition," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(508), pages 1697-1711, December.
    11. Boris G. Zaslavsky, 2013. "Bayesian Hypothesis Testing in Two-Arm Trials with Dichotomous Outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(1), pages 157-163, March.
    12. Bhramar Mukherjee & Jaeil Ahn & Stephen B. Gruber & Malay Ghosh & Nilanjan Chatterjee, 2010. "Case–Control Studies of Gene–Environment Interaction: Bayesian Design and Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(3), pages 934-948, September.
    13. Stephens Alisa & Joffe Marshall & Keele Luke, 2016. "Generalized Structural Mean Models for Evaluating Depression as a Post-treatment Effect Modifier of a Jobs Training Intervention," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 4(2), pages 1-17, September.
    14. Bibhas Chakraborty & Eric B. Laber & Yingqi Zhao, 2013. "Inference for Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes Using an Adaptive m‐Out‐of‐n Bootstrap Scheme," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(3), pages 714-723, September.
    15. Yan‐Cheng Chao & Thomas M. Braun & Roy N. Tamura & Kelley M. Kidwell, 2020. "A Bayesian group sequential small n sequential multiple‐assignment randomized trial," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(3), pages 663-680, June.
    16. Xinru WANG & Nina DELIU & NARITA Yusuke & Bibhas CHAKRABORTY, 2023. "SMART-EXAM: Incorporating Participants' Welfare into Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials," Discussion papers 23081, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    17. Jincheng Shen & Lu Wang & Jeremy M. G. Taylor, 2017. "Estimation of the optimal regime in treatment of prostate cancer recurrence from observational data using flexible weighting models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(2), pages 635-645, June.
    18. Stephens Alisa & Joffe Marshall & Keele Luke, 2016. "Generalized Structural Mean Models for Evaluating Depression as a Post-treatment Effect Modifier of a Jobs Training Intervention," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 4(2), pages 1, September.
    19. van der Laan Mark J., 2010. "Targeted Maximum Likelihood Based Causal Inference: Part I," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-45, February.
    20. Tang, Xinyu & Melguizo, Maria, 2015. "DTR: An R Package for Estimation and Comparison of Survival Outcomes of Dynamic Treatment," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 65(i07).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:79:y:2023:i:3:p:2489-2502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.