IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v73y2017i2p687-695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing violations of the exponential assumption in cancer clinical trials with survival endpoints

Author

Listed:
  • Gang Han
  • Michael J. Schell
  • Heping Zhang
  • Daniel Zelterman
  • Lajos Pusztai
  • Kerin Adelson
  • Christos Hatzis

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Gang Han & Michael J. Schell & Heping Zhang & Daniel Zelterman & Lajos Pusztai & Kerin Adelson & Christos Hatzis, 2017. "Testing violations of the exponential assumption in cancer clinical trials with survival endpoints," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(2), pages 687-695, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:73:y:2017:i:2:p:687-695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/biom.12590
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Norbert Henze & Simos G. Meintanis, 2005. "Recent and classical tests for exponentiality: a partial review with comparisons," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 29-45, February.
    2. Paul Meier & Theodore Karrison & Rick Chappell & Hui Xie, 2004. "The Price of Kaplan-Meier," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 99, pages 890-896, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Giles, 2007. "Survival of the hippest: life at the top of the hot 100," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(15), pages 1877-1887.
    2. Jovanović, Milan & Milošević, Bojana & Nikitin, Ya. Yu. & Obradović, Marko & Volkova, K. Yu., 2015. "Tests of exponentiality based on Arnold–Villasenor characterization and their efficiencies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 100-113.
    3. Gregory Fridman & Maria Lapina, 2016. "Maximum likelihood approach for demand unconstraining problem with censoring information incompleteness," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(1), pages 37-51, February.
    4. Sudheesh K. Kattumannil & P. Anisha, 2019. "A simple non-parametric test for decreasing mean time to failure," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 73-87, February.
    5. Yi Qian & Hui Xie, 2011. "No Customer Left Behind: A Distribution-Free Bayesian Approach to Accounting for Missing Xs in Marketing Models," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 717-736, July.
    6. Baringhaus, L. & Henze, N., 2008. "A new weighted integral goodness-of-fit statistic for exponentiality," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(8), pages 1006-1016, June.
    7. Ruhul Ali Khan & Dhrubasish Bhattacharyya & Murari Mitra, 2021. "Exact and asymptotic tests of exponentiality against nonmonotonic mean time to failure type alternatives," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(6), pages 3015-3045, December.
    8. Bojana Milošević & Marko Obradović, 2016. "New class of exponentiality tests based on U-empirical Laplace transform," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 977-990, December.
    9. Marija Cuparić & Bojana Milošević, 2022. "New characterization-based exponentiality tests for randomly censored data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(2), pages 461-487, June.
    10. Baringhaus, Ludwig & Taherizadeh, Fatemeh, 2010. "Empirical Hankel transforms and its applications to goodness-of-fit tests," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(6), pages 1445-1457, July.
    11. Bojana Milošević, 2016. "Asymptotic efficiency of new exponentiality tests based on a characterization," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 79(2), pages 221-236, February.
    12. M. Anis, 2011. "Comments on “Testing for NBUL using goodness of fit approach with applications” (Statistical Papers (2010) 51: 27–40, DOI 10.1007/s00362-007-0113-0)," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 743-747, August.
    13. Gerrit Lodewicus Grobler & Elzanie Bothma & James Samuel Allison, 2022. "Testing for the Rayleigh Distribution: A New Test with Comparisons to Tests for Exponentiality Based on Transformed Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Aurea Grané & Josep Fortiana, 2011. "A directional test of exponentiality based on maximum correlations," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 255-274, March.
    15. T. Fischer & U. Kamps, 2013. "Power maps in goodness-of-fit testing," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 1365-1382, June.
    16. Hadi Alizadeh Noughabi & Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan, 2016. "Tests of goodness of fit based on Phi-divergence," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 412-429, March.
    17. Albert Vexler, 2021. "Valid p-values and expectations of p-values revisited," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 73(2), pages 227-248, April.
    18. Andreas Eberl & Bernhard Klar, 2021. "A note on a measure of asymmetry," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 1483-1497, June.
    19. Haywood, John & Khmaladze, Estate, 2008. "On distribution-free goodness-of-fit testing of exponentiality," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 5-18, March.
    20. Simos Meintanis & Bojana Milošević & Marko Obradović, 2023. "Bahadur efficiency for certain goodness-of-fit tests based on the empirical characteristic function," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 86(7), pages 723-751, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:73:y:2017:i:2:p:687-695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.