IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausecr/v46y2013i2p196-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Development of Health Economics in Australia and Its Contribution to Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Jane Hall

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane Hall, 2013. "The Development of Health Economics in Australia and Its Contribution to Policy," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 46(2), pages 196-201, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausecr:v:46:y:2013:i:2:p:196-201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-8462.2013.12018.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wagstaff, Adam & Culyer, Anthony J., 2012. "Four decades of health economics through a bibliometric lens," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 406-439.
    2. John Deeble, 2013. "A Healthy Beginning: The Origins of Medicare," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 46(2), pages 191-195, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catherine Pitt & Catherine Goodman & Kara Hanson, 2016. "Economic Evaluation in Global Perspective: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Recent Literature," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(S1), pages 9-28, February.
    2. Pascual Saez, Marta & Cantarero Prieto, David, 2013. "Understanding Health Economics: A Review of Efficiency, Equity and Inequalities Studies /Entendiendo la Economía de la Salud: Una revisión de los estudios sobre eficiencia, equidad y desigualdades," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 31, pages 281-302, Septiembr.
    3. Konrad Obermann & Jasper Scheppe & Bernd Glazinski, 2013. "More Than Figures? Qualitative Research In Health Economics," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(3), pages 253-257, March.
    4. Seyyed Ali Delbari & Siew Imm Ng & Yuhanis Abdul Aziz & Jo Ann Ho, 2015. "Measuring the influence and impact of competitiveness research: a Web of Science approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 773-788, November.
    5. M. Ryan Haley, 2016. "A ranking of journals for the aspiring health economist," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(18), pages 1710-1718, April.
    6. Coast, Joanna, 2018. "A history that goes hand in hand: Reflections on the development of health economics and the role played by Social Science & Medicine, 1967–2017," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 227-232.
    7. José M. Merigó & Jian-Bo Yang, 2017. "Accounting Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 27(1), pages 71-100, March.
    8. John H. Cawley & Michael A. Morrisey & Kosali I. Simon, 2015. "The Earnings and Consulting Income of US Health Economists: Results from the 2012 Survey of the American Society of Health Economists," American Journal of Health Economics, MIT Press, vol. 1(2), pages 255-274, Spring.
    9. Auberth Henrik Venson & Adriana Sbicca, 2022. "Behavioral economics in the analysis of health economics," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(7), pages 1-22, July.
    10. Nan Zhang & Shanshan Wan & Peiling Wang & Peng Zhang & Qiang Wu, 2018. "A bibliometric analysis of highly cited papers in the field of Economics and Business based on the Essential Science Indicators database," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(2), pages 1039-1053, August.
    11. Susanne Mayer & Noemi Kiss & Agata Łaszewska & Judit Simon, 2017. "Costing evidence for health care decision-making in Austria: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, August.
    12. Ebru Çağlayan Akay & Merve Ertok Onurlu & Özlem Ergüt, 2023. "Health Econometrics Research: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1991 to 2020," EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(38), pages 243-264, June.
    13. Claudio A. Bonilla & José M. Merigó & Carolina Torres-Abad, 2015. "Economics in Latin America: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 1239-1252, November.
    14. Andrew N Kadykalo & Lisa A Kelly & Albana Berberi & Jessica L Reid & C Scott Findlay, 2021. "Research effort devoted to regulating and supporting ecosystem services by environmental scientists and economists," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, May.
    15. Mohammed Alkahtani & Aiman Ziout & Bashir Salah & Moath Alatefi & Abd Elatty E. Abd Elgawad & Ahmed Badwelan & Umar Syarif, 2021. "An Insight into Reverse Logistics with a Focus on Collection Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    16. Collyer, Taya A. & Smith, Katherine E., 2020. "An atlas of health inequalities and health disparities research: “How is this all getting done in silos, and why?”," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    17. Sigifredo Laengle & José M. Merigó & Nikunja Mohan Modak & Jian-Bo Yang, 2020. "Bibliometrics in operations research and management science: a university analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 769-813, November.
    18. Bethânia Ávila Rodrigues & Mariana Machado Fidelis Nascimento & Juliana Vitória Messias Bittencourt, 2021. "Mapping of the behavior of scientific publications since the decade of 1990 until the present day in the field of food and nutrition security," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(3), pages 2459-2483, March.
    19. José M. Merigó & Claudio Muller & Nikunja Mohan Modak & Sigifredo Laengle, 2019. "Research in Production and Operations Management: A University-Based Bibliometric Analysis," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 20(1), pages 1-29, March.
    20. Merigó, José M. & Mas-Tur, Alicia & Roig-Tierno, Norat & Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo, 2015. "A bibliometric overview of the Journal of Business Research between 1973 and 2014," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2645-2653.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausecr:v:46:y:2013:i:2:p:196-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mimelau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.