IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausact/v35y2025i1p49-68.html

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Professional Scepticism

Author

Listed:
  • Negin Sharifi Khaksari
  • Reza Hesarzadeh
  • Mahmoud Lari Dashtbayaz
  • Ameneh Bazrafshan
  • Ali Saeedi

Abstract

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental condition that can affect professional scepticism, a critical aspect of effective auditing. This study examines the impact of ADHD, assessed using the Integrated Visual and Auditory‐2 Continuous Performance Test, on the professional scepticism of external auditors. Results indicate a negative association between ADHD and professional scepticism, suggesting that higher levels of ADHD reduce sceptical tendencies. However, the study finds that job satisfaction significantly mitigates the adverse effects of ADHD on professional scepticism. Specifically, findings from the Johnson‐Neyman analysis reveal that high job satisfaction mitigates the adverse impact of ADHD on scepticism. This study highlights the need for audit firms to consider ADHD‐related challenges. It emphasises the importance of creating a supportive work environment to sustain professional scepticism, which is vital for enhancing audit quality and effectively managing cognitive diversity in the workforce.

Suggested Citation

  • Negin Sharifi Khaksari & Reza Hesarzadeh & Mahmoud Lari Dashtbayaz & Ameneh Bazrafshan & Ali Saeedi, 2025. "Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Professional Scepticism," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 35(1), pages 49-68, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:35:y:2025:i:1:p:49-68
    DOI: 10.1111/auar.12446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12446
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/auar.12446?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruwan Adikaram & Julia Higgs, 2024. "Cognitive dissonance and auditor professional skepticism," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 39(1), pages 71-110, January.
    2. Reza Hesarzadeh & Ameneh Bazrafshan, 2019. "CEO ability and regulatory review risk," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(5), pages 575-605, May.
    3. Yan Sun & Wancong Jia & Suyi Liu, 2022. "Is auditors’ professional scepticism a “double-edged sword”?," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(3), pages 241-263, July.
    4. Jonathan H. Grenier, 2017. "Encouraging Professional Skepticism in the Industry Specialization Era," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 241-256, May.
    5. Nolder, Christine J. & Kadous, Kathryn, 2018. "Grounding the professional skepticism construct in mindset and attitude theory: A way forward," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1-14.
    6. repec:eme:maj000:maj-08-2018-1958 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Prabashi Dharmasiri & Soon-Yeow Phang, 2024. "Fit Between Regulatory Focus and Goal Pursuit Strategies on Auditors’ Professional Skepticism," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 1257-1280, August.
    8. Burks, Jeffrey J. & Randolph, David W. & Seida, Jim A., 2019. "Modeling and interpreting regressions with interactions," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 61-79.
    9. Martin Kelly & Patricia Larres, 2023. "Enhancing the auditor's mindset: a framework for nurturing professional skepticism," Journal of Accounting Literature, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 47(1), pages 222-243, December.
    10. Ghosh, Jaideep, 2023. "“Holy curiosity of inquiry”: An investigation into curiosity and work performance of employees," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 673-686.
    11. MohammadRezaei, Fakhroddin & Mohd-Saleh, Norman & Ahmed, Kamran, 2018. "Audit Firm Ranking, Audit Quality and Audit Fees: Examining Conflicting Price Discrimination Views," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 295-313.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yaowen Shan & Sue Wright, 2025. "Values in Accounting," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 35(1), pages 3-4, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oradi, Javad, 2021. "CEO succession origin, audit report lag, and audit fees: Evidence from Iran," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    2. Sammy Xiaoyan Ying & Chris Patel & Aeson Luiz Dela Cruz, 2023. "The influence of partners' known preferences on auditors' sceptical judgements: The moderating role of perceived social influence pressure," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3193-3215, September.
    3. Yasser Alnafisah & Mouna Hazgui & Anna Samsonova-Taddei, 2025. "“The Gut Instinct Gives You Direction and then You Follow it”: Exploring the Social-Intuitive Dimension of Auditor Skepticism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 200(1), pages 189-205, August.
    4. Yi (Dale) Fu & Noel Harding & David C. Hay & Mohammad Jahanzeb Khan & Tom Scott & Harj Singh & Sarka Stepankova & Nigar Sultana, 2023. "Comments of the AFAANZ Auditing and Assurance Standards Committee on Proposed International Standard on Auditing 500 (Revised) Audit Evidence," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4805-4812, December.
    5. Zhuoli Axelton & Jeffrey Gramlich & M. Kathleen Harris, 2025. "Auditor industry expertise and the predictive power of the deferred tax valuation allowance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 65(1), pages 323-364, March.
    6. Muhammad Wahyuddin Abdullah & Anggriani Ahmad & Suhartono & Saiful Muchlis & Namla Elfa Syariati & Hadriana Hanafie, 2025. "Tawhid-Based Skepticism: Implications for Awareness Revealing Audit Findings," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 12(6), pages 576-592, June.
    7. Marwan Mansour & Hamzeh Al Amosh & Ahmad Yuosef Alodat & Saleh F. A. Khatib & Mohammed W. A. Saleh, 2022. "The Relationship between Corporate Governance Quality and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Capital Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-25, August.
    8. Aaron Saiewitz & Elaine (Ying) Wang, 2020. "Using Cultural Mindsets to Reduce Cross‐National Auditor Judgment Differences," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 1854-1881, September.
    9. Chambers, Valerie A. & Reckers, Philip M.J. & Reinstein, Alan, 2020. "Drivers of juror's malpractice assessments in auditor litigation involving offshoring and overtime: Generation and a management Mindset," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    10. Paulina Arroyo & Leslie Berger & Nadia Smaili, 2025. "Navigating Between Control and Trust: The Whistleblowing Mindset," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 199(1), pages 19-35, June.
    11. Faraji, Omid & Kashanipour, Mohammad & MohammadRezaei, Fakhroddin & Ahmed, Kamran & Vatanparast, Nader, 2020. "Political connections, political cycles and stock returns: Evidence from Iran," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    12. Intan Marzita Saidon & Widiar Onny Kurniawan & Nur Syahmina Khodari & Jurina Ismail, 2025. "Toward Understanding Ability to Detect Fraud among Internal Auditors: A Proposed Framework," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 2664-2673, September.
    13. Kathryn Kadous & Yuepin (Daniel) Zhou, 2019. "How Does Intrinsic Motivation Improve Auditor Judgment in Complex Audit Tasks?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(1), pages 108-131, March.
    14. Dela Cruz, Aeson Luiz & Patel, Chris & Ying, Sammy & Pan, Peipei, 2020. "The relevance of professional skepticism to finance professionals’ Socially Responsible Investing decisions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    15. Sun, Yan & Liu, Suyi & Jin, Justin Yiqiang, 2025. "Concerted efforts: The role of component auditors in multinational group audit in China," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    16. Egor Nikulin & Jeff Downing, 2021. "Loan-loss provisions, earnings management, and capital management by Russian banks: the impact of changes in banking regulation and oversight," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(4), pages 659-677, December.
    17. Aflatooni, Abbas & Ghaderi, Kaveh & Mansouri, Kefsan, 2022. "Sanctions against Iran, political connections and speed of adjustment," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(PB).
    18. Ricci, Michael A. & Rimkus, Dan, 2025. "Inconsistent responses to uncooperative client manager behavior: When auditors’ judgments and actions diverge," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    19. Kaveh Asiaei & Nick Bontis & Omid Barani & Ruzita Jusoh, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility and sustainability performance measurement systems: implications for organizational performance," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 85-126, March.
    20. Oradi, Javad & Makarem, Naser & Hesarzadeh, Reza, 2025. "Do female audit partners matter for audit quality? Evidence from Iran," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:35:y:2025:i:1:p:49-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1035-6908 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.