IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/agecon/v38y2008i3p363-373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A model of optimal import phytosanitary inspection under capacity constraint

Author

Listed:
  • Ilya V. Surkov
  • Alfons G. J. M. Oude Lansink
  • Olaf Van Kooten
  • Wopke Van Der Werf

Abstract

Growth and liberalization of world trade have increased the risks of introduction of quarantine plant pests into importing countries. Import inspection of incoming commodities is a major tool for prevention of pest introductions related to world trade, but inspection capacities are limited. This article develops a theoretical and an empirical model for the optimal allocation of inspection effort for phytosanitary inspection of imported commodities when the inspecting agency has a limited capacity. It is shown that the optimal allocation of inspection effort equalizes marginal costs of pest introduction across risky commodity pathways. The numerical illustration finds the optimal allocation of inspection effort of chrysanthemum cuttings imported in the Netherlands. The numerical results suggest that ceteris paribus, greater inspection effort should be allocated to pathways whose inspection yields a greater reduction in the expected costs of pest introduction. The numerical results also suggest that import inspection has a high marginal benefit. In particular, we found that each additional euro of the inspection capacity decreases the expected costs of pest introduction from 18 to 49 euros, depending on the initial inspection capacity.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilya V. Surkov & Alfons G. J. M. Oude Lansink & Olaf Van Kooten & Wopke Van Der Werf, 2008. "A model of optimal import phytosanitary inspection under capacity constraint," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 38(3), pages 363-373, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:38:y:2008:i:3:p:363-373
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00306.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00306.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00306.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. ByeongJoon Kim & Seung Cheon Hong & Daniel Egger & Catherine S. Katsar & Robert L. Griffin, 2019. "Predictive Modeling and Categorizing Likelihoods of Quarantine Pest Introduction of Imported Propagative Commodities from Different Countries," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(6), pages 1382-1396, June.
    2. Ferrier, Peyton, 2014. "The Effects of Phytosanitary Regulations on U.S. Imports of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables," Economic Research Report 176199, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Lansink, Alfons Oude, 2011. "Public and private roles in plant health management," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 166-170, April.
    4. Anthony Rossiter & Susan M Hester, 2017. "Designing Biosecurity Inspection Regimes to Account for Stakeholder Incentives: An Inspection Game Approach," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 93(301), pages 277-301, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:38:y:2008:i:3:p:363-373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.