IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/acctfi/v65y2025i2p1532-1584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long term trends in non‐audit fees and audit quality: New evidence based on going concern opinions and financial restatements

Author

Listed:
  • Pallab Kumar Biswas
  • Paul A. Griffin
  • David H. Lont

Abstract

We revisit the question of whether high levels of non‐audit fees degrade audit quality. We use a structural model to specify the key variables and a grouping approach to reduce measurement error and tighten identification of the non‐audit fee threat to audit quality. We use going concern opinions (GCOs) and financial restatements to proxy for audit quality. We find that higher non‐audit fees reduce the percentage of GCOs issued around the passage of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), and that restatements are higher around SOX also. The trends in the GCO and restatement percentages after SOX are consistent with an improvement in audit quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Pallab Kumar Biswas & Paul A. Griffin & David H. Lont, 2025. "Long term trends in non‐audit fees and audit quality: New evidence based on going concern opinions and financial restatements," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 65(2), pages 1532-1584, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:65:y:2025:i:2:p:1532-1584
    DOI: 10.1111/acfi.13376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13376
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/acfi.13376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:65:y:2025:i:2:p:1532-1584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaanzea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.