IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/acctfi/v64y2024is1p4949-4976.html

Tax authority governance and corporate internal control quality

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaojian Tang
  • Dongying Du
  • Ying Chen
  • Stephanie Tsui

Abstract

Prior studies of tax enforcement neglect the effect of tax enforcement officers' discretion on corporate internal control quality. This study exploits a unique quasi‐natural experimental setting of the reform of Chinese province‐level tax administrative penalty discretion standards since 2016 to examine the effect of tax authority governance on corporate internal control quality. We show that tax authority governance can improve corporate internal control quality. And this positive effect is more pronounced in firms with more tax avoidance and more collusion with tax supervisors. Furthermore, further analysis shows that legal enforcement and financial reporting environment can strengthen the positive relationship between tax authority governance and corporate internal control quality. Therefore, the above results show that tax authority governance not only increases the predictability of tax violation and its consequential penalties, but also restricts tax enforcement personnel's discretionary power, thereby reducing opportunities for tax avoidance and rent‐seeking behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaojian Tang & Dongying Du & Ying Chen & Stephanie Tsui, 2024. "Tax authority governance and corporate internal control quality," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(S1), pages 4949-4976, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:64:y:2024:i:s1:p:4949-4976
    DOI: 10.1111/acfi.13306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13306
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/acfi.13306?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Yan & Zhou, Jian & Zhou, Nan, 2007. "Audit committee quality, auditor independence, and internal control weaknesses," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 300-327.
    2. Andrew M. Bauer, 2016. "Tax Avoidance and the Implications of Weak Internal Controls," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 449-486, June.
    3. Zhi Jin & Chenghao Huang, 2021. "Tax enforcement and corporate donations: evidence from Chinese ‘Golden Tax Phase III’," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 526-548, October.
    4. Chalmers, Keryn & Hay, David & Khlif, Hichem, 2019. "Internal control in accounting research: A review," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 80-103.
    5. Raj Chetty & Adam Looney & Kory Kroft, 2009. "Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(4), pages 1145-1177, September.
    6. Allingham, Michael G. & Sandmo, Agnar, 1972. "Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(3-4), pages 323-338, November.
    7. Li, Chan & Sun, Lili & Ettredge, Michael, 2010. "Financial executive qualifications, financial executive turnover, and adverse SOX 404 opinions," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 93-110, May.
    8. repec:bla:jfinan:v:59:y:2004:i:2:p:537-600 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Le Zhao, 2023. "The Effect of Tax Authority Enforcement on Earnings Informativeness," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 197-216, January.
    10. Morten Bennedsen & Stefan Zeume, 2018. "Corporate Tax Havens and Transparency," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 31(4), pages 1221-1264.
    11. Haifeng Huang & Tao Wang & Zhichao Zhan, 2019. "From Business Tax to Value‐added Tax: The Effects of Reform on Chinese Transport Industry Firms," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 29(1), pages 158-176, March.
    12. Jeong-Bon Kim & Edward Lee & Xiaojian Tang & Junsheng Zhang, 2023. "Correction to: Collusive versus coercive corporate corruption: evidence from demand-side shocks and supply-side disclosures," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 1971-1971, December.
    13. Slemrod, Joel, 2004. "The Economics of Corporate Tax Selfishness," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 57(4), pages 877-899, December.
    14. Michael P. Donohoe & W. Robert Knechel, 2014. "Does Corporate Tax Aggressiveness Influence Audit Pricing?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 284-308, March.
    15. Xiaojian Tang & Dongying Du & Lina Xie & Bin Lin, 2022. "Does the standardisation of tax enforcement improve corporate financial reporting quality?," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 481-502, October.
    16. Shavell, Steven, 1993. "The Optimal Structure of Law Enforcement," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(1), pages 255-287, April.
    17. Kubick, Thomas R. & Lockhart, G. Brandon & Mills, Lillian F. & Robinson, John R., 2017. "IRS and corporate taxpayer effects of geographic proximity," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 428-453.
    18. Junsheng Zhang & Zheng Huo & Yamin Zeng & Xiaojian Tang & Oliver M. Rui, 2021. "Corporate value added tax avoidance," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 338-362, October.
    19. Wang, Fangjun & Xu, Luying & Zhang, Junrui & Shu, Wei, 2018. "Political connections, internal control and firm value: Evidence from China's anti-corruption campaign," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 53-67.
    20. Mariassunta Giannetti & Guanmin Liao & Jiaxing You & Xiaoyun Yu, 2021. "The Externalities of Corruption: Evidence from Entrepreneurial Firms in China," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 25(3), pages 629-667.
    21. Doyle, Jeffrey & Ge, Weili & McVay, Sarah, 2007. "Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1-2), pages 193-223, September.
    22. Mark L. Defond & Clive S. Lennox, 2017. "Do PCAOB Inspections Improve the Quality of Internal Control Audits?," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 55(3), pages 591-627, June.
    23. Jeong-Bon Kim & Edward Lee & Xiaojian Tang & Junsheng Zhang, 2023. "Collusive versus coercive corporate corruption: evidence from demand-side shocks and supply-side disclosures," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 1929-1970, December.
    24. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    25. Altamuro, Jennifer & Beatty, Anne, 2010. "How does internal control regulation affect financial reporting?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1-2), pages 58-74, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oliver Henk, 2020. "Internal control through the lens of institutional work: a systematic literature review," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 239-273, September.
    2. Jordan Schoenfeld, 2024. "Cyber risk and voluntary Service Organization Control (SOC) audits," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 580-620, March.
    3. Philip Beaulieu & Louise Hayes & Lev M. Timoshenko, 2023. "Changes in accounting estimates: An update of priors or an earnings management strategy of “last resort”?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3-4), pages 622-659, March.
    4. Fangjun Wang & Shuolei Xu & Junqin Sun & Charles P. Cullinan, 2020. "Corporate Tax Avoidance: A Literature Review And Research Agenda," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 793-811, September.
    5. Kwangwuk Oh & Wooseok Choi & Seok Woo Jeong & Jinhan Pae, 2014. "The effect of different levels of internal control over financial reporting regulation on the quality of accounting information: evidence from Korea," Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 412-442, December.
    6. Sarah B. Stuber & Chris E. Hogan, 2021. "Do PCAOB Inspections Improve the Accuracy of Accounting Estimates?," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 59(1), pages 331-370, March.
    7. Almunia, Miguel & Lopez-Rodriguez, David, 2012. "The efficiency cost of tax enforcement: evidence from a panel of spanish firms," MPRA Paper 44153, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Hailey B. Ballew & Amy G. Sheneman, 2025. "Regulatory consulting and banks’ financial reporting quality: evidence from the Dodd-Frank Act," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 3719-3764, December.
    9. Kovermann, Jost & Velte, Patrick, 2019. "The impact of corporate governance on corporate tax avoidance—A literature review," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Olbrich, Justus, 2025. "The effect of changes in internal control systems on audit risk," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 10(3), pages 657-676.
    11. Navarro, Patricia & Robb, Sean W.G. & Sutton, Steve G. & Weisner, Martin M., 2020. "The cost stickiness of information technology material weaknesses: An intertemporal comparison between it-related and other material weaknesses," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    12. Cho, Myojung & Chung, Kwang-Hyun, 2016. "The effect of commercial banks' internal control weaknesses on loan loss reserves and provisions," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 61-72.
    13. Zhou, Wei & Liu, Baohua & Chen, Tao & Chen, Yining, 2025. "Institutional investors' cross-ownership and internal control quality," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    14. Ja Eun Koo & Eun Sun Ki, 2020. "Internal Control Personnel’s Experience, Internal Control Weaknesses, and ESG Rating," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    15. Jian Chu & Yaowen Shan & Gary Gang Tian, 2025. "Corrupt tax bureau commissioners and corporate tax avoidance," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 1873-1915, June.
    16. Ye, Yongwei & Zeng, Lin & Tao, Yunqing & Yun, Feng, 2023. "Tax authority monitoring and corporate information disclosure quality in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    17. Gil S. Bae & Seung UK Choi & Phillip T. Lamoreaux & Jae Eun Lee, 2021. "Auditors' Fee Premiums and Low‐Quality Internal Controls," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 586-620, March.
    18. Cheng, Mei & Dhaliwal, Dan & Zhang, Yuan, 2013. "Does investment efficiency improve after the disclosure of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 1-18.
    19. Sabrine Hamrouni & Ines Menchaoui, 2025. "The Impact of Tax Audits on Tax Avoidance Levels: The Moderating Role of Audit Quality," Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 24(2), pages 254-271, June.
    20. Li, Zhe & Wang, Bo & Wu, Tianlong & Zhou, Dan, 2021. "The influence of qualified foreign institutional investors on internal control quality: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:64:y:2024:i:s1:p:4949-4976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaanzea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.