IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjw/econen/v15y2025i2p128-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of online review on fresh food purchase intention via mobile applications: An approach of Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) theory

Author

Listed:
  • Hoa Le Thai Nguyen

    (Saigon Technology University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

  • Thi Thi Cam Tang

    (Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

Abstract

Today, consumers are interested in fresh food, and the convenience of mobile App shopping since the rise of various food delivery platforms gives consumers more choices and enables them to gather information through online reviews. This study aims to examine the impact of central and peripheral cues of Online Consumer Review (OCR) (including accuracy, completeness, timeliness, consistency, quantity, product ratings, and visual cues) toward purchase intention based on Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) and the mediating role of attitude. Previous studies explored the independent effects of central and peripheral cues on behavioral intention. However, approaching ELM, we argue that central and peripheral ones are processed jointly by online consumers rather than independently. By non-probability method with a convenience sample, data from 302 online shoppers in Vietnam were collected by online survey and analyzed with a Structural Equation Model (SEM). The results revealed that the accuracy, timeliness, consistency, quantity, and visual cues of Online Consumer Reviews (OCR) had a significant impact on attitude. Besides, attitude was found to play a fully mediating role between OCR consistency, visual cues, and purchase intention. It also played a partially mediating effect between OCR accuracy, timeliness, quantity, and purchase intention. The findings deepen insights into the factors of eWoM in the new context and propose significant implications for managers and marketers to have a better marketing strategy to improve business profitability, especially on e-commerce platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoa Le Thai Nguyen & Thi Thi Cam Tang, 2025. "The impact of online review on fresh food purchase intention via mobile applications: An approach of Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) theory," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 15(2), pages 128-151.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjw:econen:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:128-151
    DOI: 10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.15.2.3090.2025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/econ-en/article/view/3090/2139
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.15.2.3090.2025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benedikt M. Brand & Cristopher Siegfried Kopplin & Theresa Maria Rausch, 2022. "Cultural differences in processing online customer reviews: holistic versus analytic thinkers," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1039-1060, September.
    2. Ehsan Abedi & Davood Ghorbanzadeh & Atena Rahehagh, 2019. "Influence of eWOM information on consumers’ behavioral intentions in mobile social networks," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(1), pages 84-109, September.
    3. Ehsan Abedi & Davood Ghorbanzadeh & Atena Rahehagh, 2019. "Influence of eWOM information on consumers’ behavioral intentions in mobile social networks," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(1), pages 84-109, September.
    4. Zoey Chen & Jonah Berger, 2016. "How Content Acquisition Method Affects Word of Mouth," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(1), pages 86-102.
    5. Xu, Xianying & Huang, Yinghua, 2019. "Restaurant information cues, Diners’ expectations, and need for cognition: Experimental studies of online-to-offline mobile food ordering," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 231-241.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Chih-Hsing & Gan, Bernard & Ko, Wen-Hwa & Teng, Chih-Ching, 2022. "Comparison of localized and foreign restaurant brands for consumer behavior prediction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    2. Franziska Sofia Hafner & Lena Hafner & Roberto Corizzo, 2025. "‘Slightly disappointing’ vs. ‘worst sh** ever’: tackling cultural differences in negative sentiment expressions in AI-based sentiment analysis," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 1-31, August.
    3. Hu, Miao & Chen, Jie & Chen, Qimei & He, Wei, 2020. "It pays off to be authentic: An examination of direct versus indirect brand mentions on social media," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 19-28.
    4. Khan, Imran & Hollebeek, Linda D. & Fatma, Mobin & Islam, Jamid Ul & Riivits-Arkonsuo, Iivi, 2020. "Customer experience and commitment in retailing: Does customer age matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    5. Pieters, Constant, 2020. "Process analysis for marketing research," Other publications TiSEM 0855b910-aa32-42b8-91c2-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Ana Babić Rosario & Kristine Valck & Francesca Sotgiu, 2020. "Conceptualizing the electronic word-of-mouth process: What we know and need to know about eWOM creation, exposure, and evaluation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 422-448, May.
    7. Shankar, Amit & Dhir, Amandeep & Talwar, Shalini & Islam, Nazrul & Sharma, Piyush, 2022. "Balancing food waste and sustainability goals in online food delivery: Towards a comprehensive conceptual framework," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    8. Ho, Xuan Huong & Nguyen, Dong Phong & Cheng, Julian Ming Sung & Le, Angelina Nhat Hanh, 2022. "Customer engagement in the context of retail mobile apps: A contingency model integrating spatial presence experience and its drivers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    9. Roma, Paolo & Aloini, Davide, 2019. "How does brand-related user-generated content differ across social media? Evidence reloaded," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 322-339.
    10. Sun, Xiaochi & Foscht, Thomas & Eisingerich, Andreas B., 2021. "Does educating customers create positive word of mouth?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    11. Moritz Loock & Diane M. Phillips, 2020. "A Firm’s Financial Reputation vs. Sustainability Reputation: Do Consumers Really Care?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    12. K. Pooja & Pallavi Upadhyaya, 2024. "What makes an online review credible? A systematic review of the literature and future research directions," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 627-659, June.
    13. Antonia Köster & Christian Matt & Thomas Hess, 2021. "Do All Roads Lead to Rome? Exploring the Relationship Between Social Referrals, Referral Propensity and Stickiness to Video-on-Demand Websites," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(4), pages 349-366, August.
    14. Seo, Kyowon & Roh, Taewoo, 2025. "Online and offline delivery qualities: O2O satisfaction and loyalty through technology acceptance model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    15. Yida Zhai & Guanghua Han, 2022. "The effect of the inspection information sharing policy on quality‐oriented food production in online commerce," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(1), pages 84-96, January.
    16. Shah, Adnan Muhammad & Abbasi, Amir Zaib & Yan, Xiangbin, 2023. "Do online peer reviews stimulate diners’ continued log-in behavior: Investigating the role of emotions in the O2O meal delivery apps context," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    17. Lili Wang & Hanyu (Yuki) Chen & Xuan Zhang, 2024. "Make a good impression: Recommend different products for self-presentation," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 49(4), pages 581-604, November.
    18. Gallo, Iñigo & Townsend, Claudia & Alegre, Inés, 2019. "Experiential product framing and its influence on the creation of consumer reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 177-190.
    19. Xingyu Chen & Xing Li & Dai Yao & Zhimin Zhou, 2019. "Seeking the support of the silent majority: are lurking users valuable to UGC platforms?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 986-1004, November.
    20. Talwar, Shalini & Dhir, Amandeep & Scuotto, Veronica & Kaur, Puneet, 2021. "Barriers and paradoxical recommendation behaviour in online to offline (O2O) services. A convergent mixed-method study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 25-39.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    attitude and purchase intention; central routes; Elaboratory Likelihood Model (ELM); Online Consumer Reviews (OCR); peripheral cues;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjw:econen:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:128-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vu Tuan Truong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/econ-en .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.