IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bfy/ojtaje/v9y2025i1p76-87id2678.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Concerns of Developing Nations Regarding the OECD Inclusive Framework on BEPS: A Case Study of Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Chillanyang Cyprian

Abstract

Purpose: This paper addresses the concerns of developing countries regarding the implementation of the OECD Inclusive Framework on BEPS. It also assesses the success factors for the Inclusive Framework in these countries. The study, conducted in Uganda as a case study, revealed that while the Inclusive Framework is generally appreciated in developing nations, it is paramount to evaluate the potential advantages of the Inclusive Framework for their individual jurisdictions before adoption. Materials and Methods: Interview of the selected tax experts was used as a method of delivery because it provided the study with a deeper understanding of the subject matter .The in-depth one-on-one online interviews with the five tax experts using an unstructured interview guide and Microsoft Teams allowed for free flow and deep discussion of the subject matter Findings: The study found out that although the inclusive framework is well received in developing countries, its benefits are not yet clear. As such, countries must evaluate the likely benefits of the inclusive framework and compare with their Digital Services Taxes before adoption. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study recommends that developing countries unite and advocate for common positions, collaborate with developed countries, enhance participation in decision-making processes, build the capacity of tax administrations in international tax rules, data mining, and analysis, and consider introducing qualifying domestic minimum top-up taxes (QDMTTs) and/or repealing existing digital services taxes upon adopting Pillar Two.

Suggested Citation

  • Chillanyang Cyprian, 2025. "Concerns of Developing Nations Regarding the OECD Inclusive Framework on BEPS: A Case Study of Uganda," American Journal of Economics, AJPO Journals Limited, vol. 9(1), pages 76-87.
  • Handle: RePEc:bfy:ojtaje:v:9:y:2025:i:1:p:76-87:id:2678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ajpojournals.org/journals/index.php/AJE/article/view/2678
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfy:ojtaje:v:9:y:2025:i:1:p:76-87:id:2678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ajpojournals.org/journals/index.php/AJE/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.