IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bfy/ojtaje/v9y2025i1p76-87id2678.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Concerns of Developing Nations Regarding the OECD Inclusive Framework on BEPS: A Case Study of Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Chillanyang Cyprian

Abstract

Purpose: This paper addresses the concerns of developing countries regarding the implementation of the OECD Inclusive Framework on BEPS. It also assesses the success factors for the Inclusive Framework in these countries. The study, conducted in Uganda as a case study, revealed that while the Inclusive Framework is generally appreciated in developing nations, it is paramount to evaluate the potential advantages of the Inclusive Framework for their individual jurisdictions before adoption. Materials and Methods: Interview of the selected tax experts was used as a method of delivery because it provided the study with a deeper understanding of the subject matter .The in-depth one-on-one online interviews with the five tax experts using an unstructured interview guide and Microsoft Teams allowed for free flow and deep discussion of the subject matter Findings: The study found out that although the inclusive framework is well received in developing countries, its benefits are not yet clear. As such, countries must evaluate the likely benefits of the inclusive framework and compare with their Digital Services Taxes before adoption. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study recommends that developing countries unite and advocate for common positions, collaborate with developed countries, enhance participation in decision-making processes, build the capacity of tax administrations in international tax rules, data mining, and analysis, and consider introducing qualifying domestic minimum top-up taxes (QDMTTs) and/or repealing existing digital services taxes upon adopting Pillar Two.

Suggested Citation

  • Chillanyang Cyprian, 2025. "Concerns of Developing Nations Regarding the OECD Inclusive Framework on BEPS: A Case Study of Uganda," American Journal of Economics, AJPO Journals Limited, vol. 9(1), pages 76-87.
  • Handle: RePEc:bfy:ojtaje:v:9:y:2025:i:1:p:76-87:id:2678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ajpojournals.org/journals/AJE/article/view/2678
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:idq:ictduk:12802 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Alex Cobham & Petr Janský, 2018. "Global distribution of revenue loss from corporate tax avoidance: re†estimation and country results," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(2), pages 206-232, March.
    3. Michael P. Devereux, 2023. "International Tax Competition and Coordination with A Global Minimum Tax," National Tax Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 76(1), pages 145-166.
    4. repec:idq:ictduk:12778 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Mona Barake & Theresa Neef & Paul-Emmanuel Chouc & Gabriel Zucman, 2021. "Revenue Effects of the Global Minimum Tax: Country-by-Country Estimates," Post-Print halshs-04103899, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laudage, Sabine, 2020. "Corporate tax revenue and foreign direct investment: Potential trade-offs and how to address them," IDOS Discussion Papers 17/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    2. Demetrio Guzzardi & Elisa Palagi & Tommaso Faccio & Andrea Roventini, 2023. "In search of lost time: An ensemble of policies to restore fiscal progressivity and address the climate challenge," LEM Papers Series 2023/28, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    3. James W. Saunoris & Zarina Nurmanova, 2025. "The role of tax competitiveness and neutrality in shaping the size of the shadow economy: cross-country empirical evidence," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 49(1), pages 95-118, March.
    4. Fangjun Wang & Shuolei Xu & Junqin Sun & Charles P. Cullinan, 2020. "Corporate Tax Avoidance: A Literature Review And Research Agenda," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 793-811, September.
    5. Buettner, Thiess & Poehnlein, Maximilian, 2024. "Tax competition effects of a minimum tax rate: Empirical evidence from German municipalities," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    6. Garcia-Bernardo, Javier & Janský, Petr, 2024. "Profit shifting of multinational corporations worldwide," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    7. Alex Cobham & Tommaso Faccio & Javier Garcia‐Bernardo & Petr Janský & Jeffery Kadet & Sol Picciotto, 2022. "A Practical Proposal to end Corporate Tax Abuse: METR, a Minimum Effective Tax Rate for Multinationals," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(1), pages 18-33, February.
    8. Yong Geng & Wei Liu & Hanshu Chen & Xinyu Zou, 2023. "The Spillover Effects of Environmental Regulations: A Perspective of Chinese Unregulated Firms' Tax Burden," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 31(2), pages 84-111, March.
    9. Ofuan James Ilaboya & Edosa Joshua Aronmwan, 2023. "Chief Executive Officer’s attributes and tax avoidance: evidence from Nigeria," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(1), pages 99-108, March.
    10. Woodgate, Ryan, 2021. "Multinational corporations and commercialised states: Can state aid serve as the basis for an FDI-driven growth strategy?," IPE Working Papers 161/2021, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    11. Preetika Joshi & Edmund Outslay & Anh Persson & Terry Shevlin & Aruhn Venkat, 2020. "Does Public Country‐by‐Country Reporting Deter Tax Avoidance and Income Shifting? Evidence from the European Banking Industry," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 2357-2397, December.
    12. Ludovic Feulefack Kemmanang, 2021. "Do thin capitalization rules crowd out multinational firms in Africa? Looking towards efficiency in revenue mobilization," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 41(2), pages 594-603.
    13. Priyaranjan Jha & Rahul Mukherjee, 2023. "Global Taxation and National Welfare States," CESifo Working Paper Series 10522, CESifo.
    14. Sarah Godar & Giulia Aliprandi & Tommaso Faccio & Petr Janský & Katia Toledo Ruiz, 2024. "The long way to tax transparency: lessons from the early publishers of country-by-country reports," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 31(2), pages 593-634, April.
    15. Ian Goldin & Pantelis Koutroumpis & François Lafond & Julian Winkler, 2024. "Why Is Productivity Slowing Down?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(1), pages 196-268, March.
    16. Petr Janský & Miroslav Palanský, 2019. "Estimating the scale of profit shifting and tax revenue losses related to foreign direct investment," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 26(5), pages 1048-1103, October.
    17. K. V. Mukundhan & Sreevas Sahasranamam & James J. Cordeiro, 2019. "Corporate investments in tax havens: evidence from India," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(5), pages 360-388, November.
    18. Vijay Pereira & Yama Temouri & Chris Jones & Ashish Malik, 2019. "Identity of Asian Multinational Corporations: influence of tax havens," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(5), pages 325-336, November.
    19. Petr Janský & Jan Láznička & Miroslav Palanský, 2021. "Tax treaties worldwide: Estimating elasticities and revenue foregone," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 359-401, May.
    20. Michael P. Devereux & Johanna Paraknewitz & Martin Simmler, 2023. "Empirical evidence on the global minimum tax: what is a critical mass and how large is the substance‐based income exclusion?," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 9-21, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfy:ojtaje:v:9:y:2025:i:1:p:76-87:id:2678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ajpojournals.org/journals/AJE/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.