IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bfv/journl/015.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study of Employee Engagement in M/S. Penam Laboratories Ltd. and M/S. Shree Nath Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd. in the Pharmaceutical Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Gargi Sandilya

    (IILM Institute for Higher Education)

  • Shubham Gupta

    (IILM Institute for Higher Education)

Abstract

This research was conducted to understand the mind set of employees in the pharmaceutical industry in India with special focus on M/s. Penam Laboratories Ltd. and M/s. Shree Nath Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd. (SNLS). In addition, the study also aimed to uncover the reasons behind the high voluntary turnover rate in both companies. The key elements of employee engagement considered in this study are organizational structure, leadership style, evaluation and appraisals, internal communication, creativity stimulants and job satisfaction. After a review of existing literature in this area, the researchers arrived at a definition of employee engagement that has been followed throughout the study. The researchers then framed the research questions and hypotheses for the study. Primary data was collected through surveys using convenience sampling and secondary data was collected from the company websites and other sources listed in the references. The collected data was tabulated and analyzed using SPSS. Statistical analyses included basic descriptive statistics, Cronbach’s alpha for reliability measure and t-test for comparison of means of the two groups. The results of the study indicate that employees of Shree Nath Life Sciences are more engaged than those of Penam Laboratories.

Suggested Citation

  • Gargi Sandilya & Shubham Gupta, 2017. "Comparative Study of Employee Engagement in M/S. Penam Laboratories Ltd. and M/S. Shree Nath Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd. in the Pharmaceutical Sector," SBS Journal of Applied Business Research (SBS-JABR), SBS Swiss Business School, vol. 5, pages 4-27.
    • Handle: RePEc:bfv:journl:015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jabr.sbs.edu/vol5/01_Sandilya-Gupta.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dorothea Wahyu Ariani, 2013. "The Relationship between Employee Engagement, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Counterproductive Work Behavior," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(2), pages 46-56, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyo Sun Jung & Kyung Hwa Seo & Hye Hyun Yoon, 2020. "The Importance of Leader Integrity on Family Restaurant Employees’ Engagement and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Exploring Sustainability of Employees’ Generational Differences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Ms. Ginu George & Dr. Binoy Joseph, 2014. "A Study on Employees’ Engagement Level in Travel Organisations with Reference to Karnataka," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 5(3), pages 08-15, September.
    3. Alaa Ibrahim Lary & Rosmini Omar, 2021. "A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Role of Employer Branding, Person-Organization Fit and Employee Engagement in Shaping Organizational Citizenship Behavior," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 12(2), pages 172-181, December.
    4. Rana Muhammad Shahid Yaqub & Nazim Hussain & Shanayyara Mahmood & Zahra Farooq, 2021. "Linking Compensation, Employee Engagement, Employee Loyalty And Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role Of Organization Commitment," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 10(3), pages 17-32.
    5. Tilahun Kidane Diko & Shabnam Saxena, 2023. "Antecedents and outcome of employee engagement: Empirical study of Ethiopian public higher education institutions," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(8), pages 1-30, August.
    6. Ayman Alshaabani & Farheen Naz & Róbert Magda & Ildikó Rudnák, 2021. "Impact of Perceived Organizational Support on OCB in the Time of COVID-19 Pandemic in Hungary: Employee Engagement and Affective Commitment as Mediators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
    7. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Ishizaka, Alessio & Gupta, Manish & Shankar, Amit, 2022. "Gamification and gigification: A multidimensional theoretical approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1378-1393.
    8. Maruša Premru & Matej Černe & Robert Buch, 2023. "Where You Lead, I Will Follow: Leader–Member Exchange,Motivation to Lead and Employee Counterproductive Work Behavior," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    9. Theresa Obuobisa-Darko & Victoria Tsedzah, 2021. "Human Resource Development Climate and Employee Engagement in Developing Countries," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(6), pages 150-150, July.
    10. José M. Peiró & David Montesa & Aida Soriano & Malgorzata W. Kozusznik & Esther Villajos & Jorge Magdaleno & Nia Plamenova Djourova & Yarid Ayala, 2021. "Revisiting the Happy-Productive Worker Thesis from a Eudaimonic Perspective: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, March.
    11. Maria Luisa Giancaspro & Antonino Callea & Amelia Manuti, 2022. "“I Like It like That”: A Study on the Relationship between Psychological Capital, Work Engagement and Extra-Role Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Sabina Baniya Chhetri, 2017. "Antecedents and Consequences of Job Engagement: Empirical Study of Bank Employees," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 5(2), pages 167-179, July.
    13. Jia Xu & Baoguo Xie & Beth Chung, 2019. "Bridging the Gap between Affective Well-Being and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Role of Work Engagement and Collectivist Orientation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Jamila Majid & Sayma Zia & Bashir Ahmad, 2017. "Impact Of Generational Differences On Employees’ Preferences For Engagement - Enablers And Drivers At Feroze1888 Mills Ltd," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 13(1), pages 13-13.
    15. Hazrat Bilal & Naveed Farooq & Kauser Hayat, 2019. "Empirically Investigating the Impact of Employee Engagement on Counterproductive Work Behavior of Academic Staff," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(1), pages 120-127, March.
    16. Yasir Mansoor Kundi & Fawad Ahmad & Usman Nazir, 2025. "Ethics, Faith, and Engagement: Unpacking the Effect of Voice Climate on Work Engagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(1), pages 127-141, April.
    17. Rožman, Maja & Treven, Sonja & Čančer, Vesna, 2020. "The impact of promoting intergenerational synergy on the work engagement of older employees in Slovenia," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 25(1), pages 9-34.
    18. Wei Hsu & Yen-Chi Chao & Chih-Hao Yang, 2023. "Factors influencing home care workers’ loyalty in long-term nursing services," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    19. Rana Khaled Abu Khalaf & Hazar Y.Hmoud & Bader Obeidat, 2019. "Reviewing the Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction on the Effect of Employee Engagement on Organizational Performance," Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), , vol. 8(1), pages 7-23, January.
    20. repec:jso:coejss:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:7.23 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Iliyasu Shiyanbade Najeemdeen & Bello Taofik Abidemi & Farah Diana Rahmat & Bannah Daniel Bulus, 2018. "Perceived Organizational Culture and Perceived Organizational Support on Work Engagement," Academic Journal of Economic Studies, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 4(3), pages 199-208, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfv:journl:015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Milos Petkovic, Ph.D (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sbsklch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.