IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/beo/journl/v67y2022i235p37-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Cefta Influenced The Competitiveness Of Agri-Food Trade In The Western Balkans

Author

Listed:
  • Bojan Matkovski
  • Danilo Đokić
  • Luna Vodana Jović

Abstract

The regional integration with the CEFTA significantly influenced the liberalisation of the market, which led to an increase in exports of agri-food products in the Western Balkan economies. The main objective of this paper is to examine the impact of the CEFTA on the export of agrifood products of Western Balkan economies on the global and regional markets. In this context, comparative advantages have been analysed, and the gravity model based on panel data has been estimated. According to the results, all the Western Balkan economies have comparative advantages in exporting on the international market. Results of the gravity model estimation showed that free trade agreements with the CEFTA positively affected the intensification of agri-food product exports. Western Balkan economies have similar economic development and competitiveness levels. Thus, reintegrating the market established by CEFTA affected the export of agri-food products.

Suggested Citation

  • Bojan Matkovski & Danilo Đokić & Luna Vodana Jović, 2022. "How Cefta Influenced The Competitiveness Of Agri-Food Trade In The Western Balkans," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 67(235), pages 37-66, October –.
    • Handle: RePEc:beo:journl:v:67:y:2022:i:235:p:37-66
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ekof.bg.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/235-02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Duc Bao Nguyen, 2019. "A New Examination of the Impacts of Regional Trade Agreements on International Trade Patterns," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 34(2), pages 236-279.
    2. Tamás Mizik, 2021. "Agri-Food Trade Competitiveness: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Jeroen Hinloopen & Charles Marrewijk, 2001. "On the empirical distribution of the Balassa index," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 137(1), pages 1-35, March.
    4. French, Scott, 2017. "Revealed comparative advantage: What is it good for?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 83-103.
    5. Krasniqi, Besnik & Ahmetbasić, Jasmina & Bartlett, Will, 2019. "Barriers to cross-border trade in intermediate goods within regional value chains in the CEFTA region," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117484, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Run Yu & Junning Cai & PingSun Leung, 2009. "The normalized revealed comparative advantage index," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 43(1), pages 267-282, March.
    7. Matkovski, Bojan & Zekić, Stanislav & Đokić, Danilo & Jurjević, Žana & Đurić, Ivan, 2022. "Export competitiveness of agri-food sector during the EU integration process: Evidence from the Western Balkans," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11(1).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zdráhal, Ivo, 2024. "The Revealed Comparative Advantage of Agri-Food Industries in Selected Countries in the Central and Eastern Europe: Gross-Versus Value-Added Trade Flows," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 16(2), June.
    2. Hoyos, Mateo & Stellian, Rémi, 2025. "Dynamic trade elasticities and comparative advantages: Evidence from a PTA," OSF Preprints tr6e3_v1, Center for Open Science.
    3. Martin Grančay & Tomáš Dudáš, 2019. "Bilateral trade flows and comparative advantage: does the size matter?," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 41(4), pages 397-413, December.
    4. Iglesias, Matias Nehuen, 2021. "Measuring size distortions of location quotients," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 189-205.
    5. Hoyos, Mateo & Stellian, Rémi, 2025. "Dynamic trade elasticities and comparative advantages: Evidence from a PTA," SocArXiv 6fya2_v1, Center for Open Science.
    6. Beňo, Michal, . "E-working: Country Versus Culture Dimension," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 13(2).
    7. Dominika Choros-Mrozowska, 2020. "Changes and Comparisons in Pattern of Polish Chinese Trade within the “16+1” Format," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 327-342.
    8. Danna-Buitrago, Jenny Paola & Stellian, Rémi, 2022. "Which revealed comparative advantage index to choose? Theoretical and empirical considerations," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), December.
    9. Junshi Li & Yao Pan, 2023. "EU and China’s comparative advantage, trade complementarity and trade specialization dynamics in agricultural products," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 351-379, September.
    10. Nendissa, Doppy Roy & Anindita, Ratya & Khoiriyah, Nikmatul & Sa’diyah, Ana Arifatus, . "Consumption and Beef Price Changes on Demand in East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 13(2).
    11. Kaveri Deb & Bodhisattva Sengupta, 2017. "On Empirical Distribution of RCA Indices," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 6(1), pages 23-41, January.
    12. Andrey A. Gnidchenko & Vladimir A. Salnikov, 2015. "Net Comparative Advantage Index: Overcoming the Drawbacks of the Existing Indices," HSE Working papers WP BRP 119/EC/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    13. Ivo Zdráhal & Francois Stefanus Lategan & Melissa van der Merwe, . "A constant market share analysis of the competitiveness of the Czech Republic's agrifood exports (2002-2020) to the European Union," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 0.
    14. Fahima Islam & Debanjan Das, 2024. "Resilience in Radiance: Analyzing the International Makeup Industry’s Export Competitiveness Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 96-107, October.
    15. Patrik Gustavsson Tingvall & Josefin Videnord, 2020. "Regional differences in effects of publicly sponsored R&D grants on SME performance," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 951-969, April.
    16. Veselin Hadzhiev, 2014. "Overall Revealed Comparative Advantages," Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, Eurasian Publications, vol. 2(1), pages 47-53.
    17. Jenny P. Danna-Buitrago & Rémi Stellian, 2022. "A New Class of Revealed Comparative Advantage Indexes," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 477-503, July.
    18. Viet V. Hoang, 2019. "Investigating the evolution of agricultural trade specialization in transition economies: A case study from Vietnam," The International Trade Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 361-378, July.
    19. Widarjono, Agus & Mumpuni Ruchba, Sarastri, . "Demand for Meat in Indonesia: Censored AIDS Model," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 13(2).
    20. Liu, Bin & Gao, Jianbo, 2019. "Understanding the non-Gaussian distribution of revealed comparative advantage index and its alternatives," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 1-11.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q17 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agriculture in International Trade
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:beo:journl:v:67:y:2022:i:235:p:37-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Goran Petrić (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efbeoyu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.