IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/beo/journl/v62y2017i214p121-138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics Of Supply Chain Risk Management Culture In The Republic Of Serbia

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandra Andjelković

Abstract

Supply chain risk management has become imperative. Therefore, needs for proactive supply chain risk management continuously is growing. Proactive supply chain risk management is not a great problem in developed countries. The problem is present in transition countries and underdeveloped countries. In those countries has not been built awareness about the importance of networking through supply chains and risk management within the supply chain. One of them is Republic of Serbia. Outside the door of the EU, the Republic of Serbia still retains the characteristics of the old system, and that is the great limitation for implementation of proactive supply chain risk management concept. Basic aim of paper is to research the level of proactive supply chain risk management. By using an adequate statistical methods, in paper will be analysed group of large enterprises from the Republic of Serbia. Besides that, author of paper suggesting the reasons and consequences of lack of proactive supply chain risk management.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandra Andjelković, 2017. "Characteristics Of Supply Chain Risk Management Culture In The Republic Of Serbia," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 62(214), pages 121-138, June - Se.
    • Handle: RePEc:beo:journl:v:62:y:2017:i:214:p:121-138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ekof.bg.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/05-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wagner, Stephan M. & Neshat, Nikrouz, 2010. "Assessing the vulnerability of supply chains using graph theory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(1), pages 121-129, July.
    2. Frank Zwisler & Marco Hermann, 2012. "Supply Chain Risk Management in the Electronics Industry," Chapters, in: Jan Emblemsvag (ed.), Risk Management for the Future - Theory and Cases, IntechOpen.
    3. William Ho & Tian Zheng & Hakan Yildiz & Srinivas Talluri, 2015. "Supply chain risk management: a literature review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(16), pages 5031-5069, August.
    4. Marija Radosavljevic & Nada Barac & Vesna Jankovic-Milic & Aleksandra Andjelkovic, 2016. "Supply chain management maturity assessment: challenges of the enterprises in Serbia," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(6), pages 848-864, November.
    5. Kamil J. Mizgier, 2017. "Global sensitivity analysis and aggregation of risk in multi-product supply chain networks," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 130-144, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nishat Alam Choudhary & Shalabh Singh & Tobias Schoenherr & M. Ramkumar, 2023. "Risk assessment in supply chains: a state-of-the-art review of methodologies and their applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(2), pages 565-607, March.
    2. Dmitry Ivanov & Boris Sokolov, 2019. "Simultaneous structural–operational control of supply chain dynamics and resilience," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1191-1210, December.
    3. Hai Thanh Pham & Chiara Verbano, 2022. "Identification and Characterization of Supply Chain Operational Risk Profiles in Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Leonardo de Assis Santos & Leonardo Marques, 2022. "Big data analytics for supply chain risk management: research opportunities at process crossroads," Post-Print hal-03766121, HAL.
    5. Seipp, Vanessa & Michel, Alex & Siegfried, Patrick, 2020. "Review of International Supply Chain Risk Within Banking Regulations in Asia, US and EU Including Proposals to Improve Cost Efficiency by Meeting Regulatory Compliance," MPRA Paper 111579, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 23 Aug 2020.
    6. Seyyed Mohammad Seyyed Alizadeh Ganji & Mohammad Hayati, 2016. "Identifying and Assessing the Risks in the Supply Chain," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(6), pages 1-74, June.
    7. Qazi, Abroon & Dickson, Alex & Quigley, John & Gaudenzi, Barbara, 2018. "Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 24-42.
    8. Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1411-1431, December.
    9. Zsuzsanna Bacsi & Mária Fekete-Farkas & Muhammad Imam Ma’ruf, 2023. "A Graph-Based Network Analysis of Global Coffee Trade—The Impact of COVID-19 on Trade Relations in 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-32, February.
    10. Abbas, Ali & Iftikhar, Younas, 2023. "A Narrative Study on Quality Assurance Models," OSF Preprints wp843, Center for Open Science.
    11. Goknur Arzu Akyuz & Guner Gursoy, 2020. "Strategic management perspectives on supply chain," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(2), pages 213-241, May.
    12. Antonio Zavala-Alcívar & María-José Verdecho & Juan-José Alfaro-Saiz, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-38, August.
    13. Huimin Liu & Yupeng Shi & Xuze Yang & Wentao Zhang, 2023. "The Role of Business Environment and Digital Government in Mitigating Supply Chain Vulnerability—Evidence from the COVID-19 Shock," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
    14. Maureen S. Golan & Laura H. Jernegan & Igor Linkov, 2020. "Trends and applications of resilience analytics in supply chain modeling: systematic literature review in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 222-243, June.
    15. Ghafoor, Laiba, 2023. "A Study on Quality Implementation Models: Action, Plans and Strategies," OSF Preprints 4szcj, Center for Open Science.
    16. Björn Häckel & Florian Hänsch & Michael Hertel & Jochen Übelhör, 2019. "Assessing IT availability risks in smart factory networks," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 523-558, December.
    17. Silvia Carpitella & Ilyas Mzougui & Joaquín Izquierdo, 2022. "Multi-criteria risk classification to enhance complex supply networks performance," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(3), pages 769-785, September.
    18. Jarmila Horváthová & Martina Mokrišová & Martin Bača, 2023. "Bankruptcy Prediction for Sustainability of Businesses: The Application of Graph Theoretical Modeling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Qian Zhou & Shuxiang Wang, 2021. "Study on the Relations of Supply Chain Digitization, Flexibility and Sustainable Development—A Moderated Multiple Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    20. Jamshed Raza & Yuxin Liu & Jianwei Zhang & Nan Zhu & Zohaib Hassan & Habib Gul & Sikander Hussain, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Management Practices and Sustainability Performance: The Dynamic Capability Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    supply chain; risk management; proactive risk management; partnership;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L14 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:beo:journl:v:62:y:2017:i:214:p:121-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Goran Petrić (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efbeoyu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.