IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/oejbsm/v2y2017i6p56-79id451.html

Effect Of Risk Analysis On Performance Of Financial Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Lagat Fredrick Kiprop

  • Josephat Yegon

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of risk analysis on performance of financial institutions. Methodology: The study used explanatory research design. The study used stratified random sampling to select respondents from target population comprising of managers of 46 commercial banks, 52 Micro Finance institutions (MFIs) and 200 SACCOs and a sample size of 239 respondents obtained. Data was collected using questionnaires. Descriptive statistics was presented, while inferential statistics was done using Pearson product moment correlation. Results: The risk analysis had positive relationship with the performance of financial institutions. Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: considerations due to the complexity of the financial sector nowadays makes it necessary before any policy analysis should rely upon different indicators and mainly upon those that reflect the whole reality of the industry performance and explicitly consider and carefully impose some regulations that consider different characteristics of ownership structure of financial institutions and the level of risk tolerance. Key words: Risk analysis, performance, financial institutions

Suggested Citation

  • Lagat Fredrick Kiprop & Josephat Yegon, 2017. "Effect Of Risk Analysis On Performance Of Financial Institutions," European Journal of Business and Strategic Management, International Peer Review Journals and Books, vol. 2(6), pages 56-79.
    • Handle: RePEc:bdu:oejbsm:v:2:y:2017:i:6:p:56-79:id:451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/EJBSM/article/view/451
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammad Hakkak & Masoud Ghodsi, 2015. "Development of a Sustainable Competitive Advantage Model Based On Balanced Scorecard," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(5), pages 298-308, May.
    2. Mohammad Hakkak & Masoud Ghodsi, 2015. "Development of a Sustainable Competitive Advantage Model Based on Balanced Scorecard," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(5), pages 298-308.
    3. Judge, William Q. & Naoumova, Irina & Koutzevol, Nadejda, 2003. "Corporate governance and firm performance in Russia: an empirical study," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 385-396, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. KONIECZNA Izabela Izabela, 2018. "The Author’s Model of Assessing the Possibility of Achieving a Competitive Advantage Based on the Business Model and Position in the Supply Chain," Journal of Economic and Social Development, Clinical Journals Press, vol. 5(01), pages 010-018.
    2. Jianhua Zhang & Farrah Nayab Jehangir & Lan Yang & Muhammad Abubakar Tahir & Shanza Tabasum, 2025. "Competitive Advantage and Firm Performance: The Role of Organizational Culture, Organizational Innovation, and Knowledge Sharing," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 3081-3107, March.
    3. Gita Sugiyarti & Gita Sugiyarti & Hendar, 2017. "Experiential Marketing Creative Antecedence for Success of Brand Loyalty (A Study on the Users of Perfume for Body in Indonesia)," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 529-536.
    4. I Ketut Budarma & I Ketut Astawa & Cokorda Istri Sri Widhari & Ni Made Rai Erawati, 2020. "Competitive Advantage of Green Hospitality Business Practices in 5 Star Hotels in Bali," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 13(1), pages 420-431, November.
    5. Anup Banerjee & Mattias Nordqvist & Karin Hellerstedt, 2020. "The role of the board chair—A literature review and suggestions for future research," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 372-405, November.
    6. Trinh, Vu Quang & Cao, Ngan Duong & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2023. "Driven mechanisms of board commitment: A modified corporate CANE model," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 21-33.
    7. Ichiro Iwasaki, 2018. "Corporate Governance System and Regional Heterogeneity: Evidence from East and West Russia," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 391-420, September.
    8. Geeta Duppati & Albert Sune & Navajyoti Samanta, 2017. "Corporate governance, research and development volatility and firm performance - Evidence from Spain and Ireland," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1317117-131, January.
    9. Efstathios Tapinos & Graham Leask & Mike Brown, 2023. "Perceived environmental turbulence and corporate strategy: The case of the UK recession," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(3-4), September.
    10. Akshita Arora & Chandan Sharma, 2015. "Impact of Firm Performance on Board Characteristics: Empirical Evidence from India," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 4(1), pages 53-70, January.
    11. Sheeba Kapil & Rakesh K Mishra, 2019. "Corporate Governance structure and firm performance in Indian context: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach," Working Papers 1937, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade.
    12. Tutun Mukherjee & Som Sankar Sen, 2022. "Impact of CEO attributes on corporate reputation, financial performance, and corporate sustainable growth: evidence from India," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-50, December.
    13. Davydov, Denis & Nikkinen, Jussi & Vähämaa, Sami, 2014. "Does the decision to issue public debt affect firm valuation? Russian evidence," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 136-151.
    14. Wenyuan Liu & Ting Ren & Weishan Tang, 2021. "Teachers in the Top Management Team and Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-23, December.
    15. Akshita Arora, 2022. "Gender diversity in boardroom and its impact on firm performance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(3), pages 735-755, September.
    16. Aswini Kumar Mishra & Shikhar Jain & R. L. Manogna, 2021. "Does corporate governance characteristics influence firm performance in India? Empirical evidence using dynamic panel data analysis," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(1), pages 71-82, March.
    17. Urbi Garay & Maximiliano González, 2008. "Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Case of Venezuela," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(3), pages 194-209, May.
    18. Muravyev, Alexander, 2017. "Boards of directors in Russian publicly traded companies in 1998–2014: Structure, dynamics and performance effects," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 5-25.
    19. McCarthy, Daniel J. & Puffer, Sheila M., 2003. "Corporate governance in Russia: a framework for analysis," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 397-415, November.
    20. Yahya Ali Al-Matari & Abdullah Kaid Al-Swidi & Faudziah Hanim Bt Fadzil & Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari, 2012. "Board of Directors, Audit Committee Characteristics and Performance of Saudi Arabia Listed Companies," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 2(4), pages 241-251.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:oejbsm:v:2:y:2017:i:6:p:56-79:id:451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/EJBSM/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.