Author
Listed:
- H. D. Hasitha Jeewanthi
(Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.)
- Osantha N. Thalpawila
(Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.)
Abstract
Local government refers to the system of administration at the local level, aimed at promoting the well-being and common good of the local level citizens. A major problem that can be identified in local government institutions in Sri Lanka is their failure to provide quality services to the community. In this context, the objectives of this study were to: (a) Examine the contemporary role of local government institutions, (b) Explore the level of citizen engagement in the local government process, and (c) Identify challenges and barriers that hinder the effective delivery of services at the local level. A qualitative research method was used for this study, with Ratnapura District selected as the study area. A total of 120 respondents were selected using random sampling methods. The findings were analyzed using a descriptive analysis method and discussed thematically. This study revealed that local government has established the necessary legal framework to ensure service quality and enhance citizen participation. However, in practice, citizens have limited awareness of the services provided by local government institutions. Additionally, citizen-based participatory programs lack transparency and accountability. E-governance facilities in local government are not fully inclusive, and many citizens struggle to access them. The general view is that local government institutions, lacking autonomous powers, have limited authority, functions, and resources, making local government reliant on patronage privileges. To ensure accountability, responsiveness, and transparency, public participation should go beyond symbolic engagement and be rooted in a broad, inclusive approach. Strengthening the relationship between citizens and the local government process should serve as the foundation for service delivery by reforming outdated legal and policy frameworks while operating with a focus on the development of the periphery.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-7:p:406-416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.