IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-6p854-868.html

Strengthening Environmental Governance in Ghana’s Oil and Gas Sector. A Critical Appraisal of Legal and Institutional Frameworks

Author

Listed:
  • Anuwar-Sadat Amadu

    (Department of Justice, Law, and Criminology, American University)

Abstract

The oil and gas sector, often heralded as a vital contributor to the economies of many developing nations especially in Africa, paradoxically produces significant environmental pollutants and waste. This sector, while inherently prone to releasing pollutants, can significantly mitigate the extent of such pollution through strict regulatory mechanisms. In Ghana, despite the existence of regulations and legislative measures aimed at mitigating environmental challenges in the oil and gas sector, several studies have upheld the view that there is continuous disregard for the existing regulations, manifested in the pollution of water bodies and the degradation of lands indiscriminately. This study systematically reviewed existing literature as well as collecting empirical data to identify the gaps and weaknesses in the legal and institutional framework for environmental protection in Ghana’s oil and gas sector. The PRISMA Checklist served as a framework for the study. A Likert scale index and thematic analysis were conducted to aid in the presentation of results. The review reveals several prominent themes, including ineffective enforcement and compliance, limited stakeholder engagement, the absence of industry-specific environmental guidelines and resource constraints for environmental agencies or institutions to effectively carry out their mandate. The review underscores the notion that there are gaps in the legal and institutional framework for protecting the environment in the oil and gas sector. The identified gaps collectively emphasize the dire need for significant enhancements in the nation’s regulatory and institutional apparatus dedicated to environmental protection within the oil and gas sector. This multi-faceted array of weaknesses highlights not only the urgency of reform but also the interconnectedness of these issues, reinforcing the imperative for a holistic and integrated approach to addressing them.

Suggested Citation

  • Anuwar-Sadat Amadu, 2025. "Strengthening Environmental Governance in Ghana’s Oil and Gas Sector. A Critical Appraisal of Legal and Institutional Frameworks," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(6), pages 854-868, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-6:p:854-868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-6/854-868.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/strengthening-environmental-governance-in-ghanas-oil-and-gas-sector-a-critical-appraisal-of-legal-and-institutional-frameworks/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kedong Yin & Lu Liu & Haolei Gu, 2022. "Green Paradox or Forced Emission Reduction—The Dual Effects of Environmental Regulation on Carbon Emissions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Maxim Voronov & Klaus Weber, 2020. "People, Actors, and the Humanizing of Institutional Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 873-884, June.
    3. Oran R. Young & Olav Schram Stokke, 2020. "Why is it hard to solve environmental problems? The perils of institutional reductionism and institutional overload," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 5-19, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maxim Voronov & Mary Ann Glynn & Klaus Weber, 2022. "Under the Radar: Institutional Drift and Non‐Strategic Institutional Change," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 819-842, May.
    2. Weik, Elke, 2022. "A new lease for life? The return of vitalism in management and organization studies," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 2-9.
    3. Peter H. Sand & Jeffrey McGee, 2022. "Lessons learnt from two decades of international environmental agreements: law," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 263-278, June.
    4. Alex Bitektine & Patrick Haack & Joel Bothello & Johanna Mair, 2020. "Inhabited Actors: Internalizing Institutions through Communication and Actorhood Models," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 885-897, June.
    5. Mrinal Saikia & Ratul Mahanta, 2024. "Institutions’ adaptability in reducing vulnerability: a study in the char lands of Assam," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 810-835, December.
    6. Ansellia Adams & John M. Luiz, 2022. "Incomplete Institutional Change and the Persistence of Racial Inequality: The Contestation of Institutional Misalignment in South Africa," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 857-885, June.
    7. Zhian Yang & Xiaochen Liu & Alina Badulescu, 2024. "Financing Sustainability: Unveiling the Role of Government Debt in Carbon Reduction Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Sarah Margaretha Jastram & Johanna Foersterling, 2024. "Clarifying ends in institutional decoupling theory: insights from social impact research," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 501-523, April.
    9. Hee‐Chan Song, 2023. "Identity Conflict Amidst Environmental Change: An Ethnography of a Korean Buddhist Temple," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 889-923, June.
    10. Renate E. Meyer & Eero Vaara, 2020. "Institutions and Actorhood as Co‐Constitutive and Co‐Constructed: The Argument and Areas for Future Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 898-910, June.
    11. Yichao Xie & Bowen Zhou & Zhenyu Wang & Bo Yang & Liaoyi Ning & Yanhui Zhang, 2023. "Industrial Carbon Footprint (ICF) Calculation Approach Based on Bayesian Cross-Validation Improved Cyclic Stacking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-35, September.
    12. Ai, Hongshan & Tan, Xiaoqing & Zhou, Shengwen & Zhou, Yuhan & Xing, Hongye, 2023. "The impact of environmental regulation on carbon emissions: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1067-1079.
    13. Tobias Böhmelt, 2022. "Environmental-agreement design and political ideology in democracies," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 507-525, September.
    14. Nicola Mountford & Susi Geiger, 2021. "Markets and institutional fields: foundational concepts and a research agenda," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 290-303, December.
    15. Matilda Petersson & Peter Stoett, 2022. "Lessons learnt in global biodiversity governance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 333-352, June.
    16. Wang, Yufeng, 2023. "Can the green credit policy reduce carbon emission intensity of “high-polluting and high-energy-consuming” enterprises? Insight from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    17. Keping Men & Hui Sun, 2025. "The Impact of GVC Participation on China’s Trade-Implicit Carbon Emission Intensity: A Moderating Effect Based on Industrial Digitalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-20, July.
    18. Chengqing Liu & Dan Yang & Jun Sun & Yu Cheng, 2023. "The Impact of Environmental Regulations on Pollution and Carbon Reduction in the Yellow River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-21, January.
    19. Chen Zhao & Jiaxuan Zhu & Zhiyao Xu & Yixuan Wang & Bin Liu & Lu Yuan & Xiaowen Wang & Jiali Xiong & Yiming Zhao, 2022. "The Effect of Air Pollution Control Auditing on Reducing Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-15, December.
    20. Wenjie Li & Muhammad Yaseen Bhutto & Idrees Waris & Tianyang Hu, 2023. "The Nexus between Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility, Green Intellectual Capital and Green Innovation towards Business Sustainability: An Empirical Analysis of Chinese Automobile Manufacturing Firms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-20, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-6:p:854-868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.