IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025i3sp3949-3971.html

Exploring Ethical Perceptions of AI Use in Academic Integrity Among Students in Teacher Education and Business Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Angelito M. Rivera

    (College of Teacher Education, ELJ Memorial College, Philippines)

  • Ferdinand L. Osena

    (College of Teacher Education, ELJ Memorial College, Philippines)

Abstract

The paper investigates ethical perceptions toward the use of AI in terms of academic integrity among students in the teacher education and business programs of ELJ Memorial College, Philippines. Informed by the Ethical Risk Mitigation Framework, the study explores how students in the two departments understand and rank order risks associated with AI, focusing on bias and discrimination, privacy and security, transparency, over-reliance, and equity. The research utilized an exploratory mixed-methods design, combining a descriptive cross-sectional survey with qualitative data collection via interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean, median, and IQR) and Mann-Whitney U, while qualitative data were thematically analyzed to enrich understanding of student perceptions. The results indicate that both groups of students, irrespective of their area of studies, acknowledge the ethical dilemmas introduced by AI in education; however, their concerns vary: while teacher education students are more oriented toward bias, transparency, over-reliance, and equity, business students concentrate on privacy and security. Significant differences were also found in the five ethical categories. The results underscore the impact of disciplinary training on moral reasoning and suggest the value of contextually situated, discipline-specific AI ethics training in higher education. The paper provides recommendations for designing institutional policies that facilitate AI’s responsible and equitable uptake.

Suggested Citation

  • Angelito M. Rivera & Ferdinand L. Osena, 2025. "Exploring Ethical Perceptions of AI Use in Academic Integrity Among Students in Teacher Education and Business Studies," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(3s), pages 3949-3971, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:3s:p:3949-3971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-3s/3949-3971.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/exploring-ethical-perceptions-of-ai-use-in-academic-integrity-among-students-in-teacher-education-and-business-studies/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bin-Nashwan, Saeed Awadh & Sadallah, Mouad & Bouteraa, Mohamed, 2023. "Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Angelito M. Rivera, 2025. "Assessing SDG Awareness Among College Students at ELJ Memorial College," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(3), pages 566-579, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hengzhi Hu & Qing Zhou & Harwati Hashim, 2025. "Negotiating identity in the age of ChatGPT: non-native English researchers’ experiences with AI-assisted academic writing," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Rice, Stephen & Crouse, Sean R. & Winter, Scott R. & Rice, Connor, 2024. "The advantages and limitations of using ChatGPT to enhance technological research," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:12:p:571-582 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Hao, Xinyue & Demir, Emrah & Eyers, Daniel, 2024. "Exploring collaborative decision-making: A quasi-experimental study of human and Generative AI interaction," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    5. Andersen, Jens Peter & Degn, Lise & Fishberg, Rachel & Graversen, Ebbe K. & Horbach, Serge P.J.M. & Schmidt, Evanthia Kalpazidou & Schneider, Jesper W. & Sørensen, Mads P., 2025. "Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in the research process – A survey of researchers’ practices and perceptions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    6. Rehman, Anis ur & Behera, Rajat Kumar & Islam, Md. Saiful & Abbasi, Faraz Ahmad & Imtiaz, Asma, 2024. "Assessing the usage of ChatGPT on life satisfaction among higher education students: The moderating role of subjective health," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    7. Blondeel, Eva & Bullock, Taylor & Gaskin, James & Schuetzler, Ryan & Serre, Rachel & Steffen, Jacob & Wells, Taylor M. & Wood, David A., 2025. "The effects of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) on learning in an accounting data analytics course," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    8. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:12:p:2390-2394 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Xing, Yunfei & Zhang, Justin Zuopeng & Teng, Guangqing & Zhou, Xiaotang, 2024. "Voices in the digital storm: Unraveling online polarization with ChatGPT," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    10. Bin-Nashwan, Saeed Awadh & Li, Jackie Zhanbiao, 2025. "AI-infused knowledge and green intellectual capital: pathways to spur accounting performance drawn from RBV-KBV model and sustainability culture," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    11. Khizar, Hafiz Muhammad Usman & Ashraf, Aqsa & Yuan, Jingbo & Al-Waqfi, Mohammed, 2025. "Insights into ChatGPT adoption (or resistance) in research practices: The behavioral reasoning perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    12. Linna Li & Yiping Wu & Yu Wang, 2025. "Exposure of Academic Misconduct and Universities’ Innovation Output: Evidence from Retractions in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 200(3), pages 649-668, September.
    13. Wu, Qinqin & Zhuang, Qinqin & Liu, Yitong & Han, Longyan, 2024. "Technology shock of ChatGPT, social attention and firm value: Evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    14. Xi Huang & Savitri Gadavanij, 2025. "Power and marginalization in discourse on AI in education (AIEd): social actors’ representation in China Daily (2018–2023)," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Ivanov, Stanislav & Soliman, Mohammad & Tuomi, Aarni & Alkathiri, Nasser Alhamar & Al-Alawi, Alamir N., 2024. "Drivers of generative AI adoption in higher education through the lens of the Theory of Planned Behaviour," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    16. Pham, Hong Chuong & Duong, Cong Doanh & Nguyen, Giang Khanh Huyen, 2024. "What drives tourists’ continuance intention to use ChatGPT for travel services? A stimulus-organism-response perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    17. Wei, Xinyi & Chu, Xiaoyuan & Geng, Jingyu & Wang, Yuhui & Wang, Pengcheng & Wang, HongXia & Wang, Caiyu & Lei, Li, 2024. "Societal impacts of chatbot and mitigation strategies for negative impacts: A large-scale qualitative survey of ChatGPT users," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:3s:p:3949-3971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.