IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v10y2026i2p5170-5186.html

Investigating the Role of Feedback in ESL Writing Proficiency: Evidence from Action Research

Author

Listed:
  • U.R.D.I Rathnayaka

    (School of Education, Faculty of Humanities and Sciences, Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology Malabe)

  • D.M.M.S Dissanayake

    (Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Humanities and Sciences, Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology Malabe)

Abstract

This action research investigates the effectiveness of peer feedback and teacher-provided verbal feedback in enhancing paragraph writing proficiency among secondary level English as a Second Language (ESL) learners. Writing is a critical yet challenging skill for ESL learners, and effective feedback plays a key role in developing this skill. Over two months, 20 students participated in paragraph writing activities, classroom observations, and interviews to examine the impact of structured peer and teacher feedback on their writing and perceptions. Findings revealed that combining these strategies significantly improved students’ writing, as reflected in higher posttest scores. Students also reported increased motivation, confidence, and autonomy. Peer feedback fostered collaboration and critical thinking, while teacher feedback provided clear guidance for improvement. However, challenges such as perceived judgment and lack of trust in peer feedback were noted, with possible mitigation through structured support. These insights contribute to ESL education by offering a foundation for future research and practice in improving writing instructions. Overall, integrating peer and teacher feedback enhances linguistic proficiency, learner independence, and interactive learning in ESL writing classrooms.

Suggested Citation

  • U.R.D.I Rathnayaka & D.M.M.S Dissanayake, 2026. "Investigating the Role of Feedback in ESL Writing Proficiency: Evidence from Action Research," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 10(2), pages 5170-5186, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:2:p:5170-5186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/uploads/vol10-iss2-pg5170-5186-202603_pdf.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/view/investigating-the-role-of-feedback-in-esl-writing-proficiency-evidence-from-action-research/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Somchai Watcharapunyawong & Siriluck Usaha, 2013. "Thai EFL Students’ Writing Errors in Different Text Types: The Interference of the First Language," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(1), pages 1-67, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pham Vu Phi Ho & Pham Ngoc Thuy Duong, 2015. "Common errors in writing journals of the English major students at Ho Chi Minh City Open University," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 5(1), pages 13-22.
    2. Raveewan Wanchid, 2013. "The Use of Self-Correction, Paper-pencil Peer Feedback and Electronic Peer Feedback in the EFL Writing Class: Opportunities and Challenges," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 2, November.
    3. Bayatee Dueraman, 2015. "The Crucial Point in Time Where Thai Students Are Introduced English Language Writing," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(9), pages 1-96, September.
    4. Singkham Rakpa, 2022. "Enhancing Thai-English Translation Capabilities of EFL Undergraduates with the Principle of Haujai Nakpraj (Learned-man Approach)," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(8), pages 1-60, December.
    5. Kanyakorn Sermsook & Jiraporn Liamnimitr & Rattaneekorn Pochakorn, 2017. "An Analysis of Errors in Written English Sentences: A Case Study of Thai EFL Students," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(3), pages 101-101, March.
    6. Sahar Nasser Alshumaimmeri & Reem Alqarni, 2022. "Teacher and Student Perceptions of CALL Feedback: Synchronous and Asynchronous Teacher Electronic Feedback in EFL-Writing at King Saud University," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(12), pages 114-114, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:2:p:5170-5186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.