IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bbz/fcpbbr/v9y2012i1p125-145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antecedents for defining management control system design: empirical evidence from Brazilian firms

Author

Listed:
  • Fábio Frezatti

    (University of São Paulo)

  • Emanuel Junqueira

    (Espirito Santo Federal University)

  • Diógenes de Souza Bido

    (Mackenzie Presbyterian University)

  • Artur Roberto do Nascimento

    (Feira de Santana State University)

  • Tânia Regina Sordi Relvas

    (University of São Paulo)

Abstract

This work analyzes the development profile of Brazilian firms regarding management accounting attributes. Much has been written in recent years about the design of management control systems and the use of management control artifacts, but there is a relevant antecedent that has been little explored, namely the profile of these attributes, involving aspects such as scope, timeliness, integration and aggregation (Chenhall & Morris, 1986; Silvola, 2008). These attributes define, limit and expand the power for management control to act (Berry, Broadbent & Otley, 2005) and they are interdependent, since each influences the others. They are the basis on which the organization’s management model is structured and developed. Within the universe of a firm’s management control, there are various artifacts that are implemented with the aim of providing support to managers’ decision-making process, besides coordination and influence on the employees (Anthony & Govindarajan, 2002; Hansen & Mouritsen, 2007). Among the existing artifacts cited in the literature as relevant for the planning and control process are strategic planning, budgeting, capital budgeting, profitability analysis, rolling forecasting and real options. In a changing environment, the attributes can change in terms of form and amplitude, demand and utilization, implying the need for integrated and proactive review and adjustment. The impact of the adequacy of these attributes on the design and use of management control systems is so relevant that they can distort and impair this design and use. To address the theme within a consistent theoretical framework, the idea of attribute in this article is based on some classic works (Chenhall & Morris, 1986; Silvola, 2008). This is a descriptive study, developed from an exploratory perspective, looking ahead to more comprehensive development in the future, given the absence of analogous works on Brazilian firms. The study was carried out through a survey of a sample composed of 125 Brazilian firms, with the data gathered by a structured questionnaire administered over the Internet. The data were analyzed by partial least squares path modeling (PLS-PM). The results suggest that the attributes examined are related in different ways, depending on the profile of the organization’s scope, influencing the existence of some management accounting artifacts, which should be taken into account in defining or updating the management information system. In short, if a firm wants to use artifacts for management control, it should review the structuring of its attributes.

Suggested Citation

  • Fábio Frezatti & Emanuel Junqueira & Diógenes de Souza Bido & Artur Roberto do Nascimento & Tânia Regina Sordi Relvas, 2012. "Antecedents for defining management control system design: empirical evidence from Brazilian firms," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 9(1), pages 125-145, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bbz:fcpbbr:v:9:y:2012:i:1:p:125-145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/download/280/429
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simons, Robert, 1990. "The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: New perspectives," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 15(1-2), pages 127-143.
    2. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    3. Chenhall, R. H. & Langfield-Smith, K., 1998. "The relationship between strategic priorities, management techniques and management accounting: an empirical investigation using a systems approach," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 243-264, April.
    4. Henri, Jean-Francois, 2006. "Organizational culture and performance measurement systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 77-103, January.
    5. Bouwens, Jan & Abernethy, Margaret A., 2000. "The consequences of customization on management accounting system design," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 221-241, April.
    6. Chenhall, Robert H., 2003. "Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 127-168.
    7. Peter B. Seddon, 1997. "A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(3), pages 240-253, September.
    8. Moores, Ken & Yuen, Susana, 2001. "Management accounting systems and organizational configuration: a life-cycle perspective," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 26(4-5), pages 351-389.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Veen-Dirks, Paula, 2010. "Different uses of performance measures: The evaluation versus reward of production managers," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 141-164, February.
    2. Huikku, Jari & Karjalainen, Jouko & Seppälä, Tomi, 2018. "The dynamism of pre-decision controls in the appraisal of strategic investments," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(5), pages 516-538.
    3. Henri, Jean-Francois, 2006. "Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 529-558, August.
    4. Bedford, David S. & Malmi, Teemu & Sandelin, Mikko, 2016. "Management control effectiveness and strategy: An empirical analysis of packages and systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 12-28.
    5. Cinquini, Lino & Tenucci, Andrea, 2007. "Is the adoption of Strategic Management Accounting techniques really “strategy-driven”? Evidence from a survey," MPRA Paper 11819, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Henri, Jean-François & Wouters, Marc, 2020. "Interdependence of management control practices for product innovation: The influence of environmental unpredictability," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    7. Ana Filipa Roque, 2018. "Control Systems and Strategy: A Literature Review," GATR Journals jmmr201, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    8. Mundy, Julia, 2010. "Creating dynamic tensions through a balanced use of management control systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 499-523, July.
    9. Peters, Matt D. & Wieder, Bernhard & Sutton, Steve G. & Wakefield, James, 2016. "Business intelligence systems use in performance measurement capabilities: Implications for enhanced competitive advantage," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 1-17.
    10. Hall, Matthew, 2008. "The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(2-3), pages 141-163.
    11. Pérez-Méndez, José Antonio & Machado-Cabezas, Ángel, 2015. "Relationship between management information systems and corporate performance," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 32-43.
    12. Bhimani, Alnoor & Sivabalan, Prabhu & Soonawalla, Kazbi, 2018. "A study of the linkages between rolling budget forms, uncertainty and strategy," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 306-323.
    13. Erkki K. Laitinen & Aapo Länsiluoto & Soila Salonen, 2016. "Interactive budgeting, product innovation, and firm performance: empirical evidence from Finnish firms," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 293-322, November.
    14. Sophie Hoozée & Falconer Mitchell, 2018. "Who Influences the Design of Management Accounting Systems? An Exploratory Study," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(3), pages 374-390, September.
    15. Henri, Jean-Francois, 2006. "Organizational culture and performance measurement systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 77-103, January.
    16. Frezatti, Fabio & Aguiar, Andson B. & Guerreiro, Reinaldo & Gouvea, Maria A., 2011. "Does management accounting play role in planning process?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 242-249, March.
    17. Journeault, Marc & De Rongé, Yves & Henri, Jean-François, 2016. "Levers of eco-control and competitive environmental strategy," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 316-340.
    18. Berry, A.J. & Coad, A.F. & Harris, E.P. & Otley, D.T. & Stringer, C., 2009. "Emerging themes in management control: A review of recent literature," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 2-20.
    19. Fleming, Damon M. & Chow, Chee W. & Chen, Gongmeng, 2009. "Strategy, performance-measurement systems, and performance: A study of Chinese firms," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 256-278, September.
    20. Ellen Haustein & Robert Luther & Peter Schuster, 2014. "Management control systems in innovation companies: a literature based framework," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 343-382, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bbz:fcpbbr:v:9:y:2012:i:1:p:125-145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Lasso (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fucapbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.