IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bbz/fcpbbr/v5y2008i1p01-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Empirical Relationship Between Stock Returns, Return Volatility and Trading Volume in the Brazilian Stock Market

Author

Listed:
  • Otavio Ribeiro de Medeiros

    (University of Brasilia)

  • Bernardus Ferdinandus Nazar Van Doornik

    (Brazil Central Bank)

Abstract

We investigate the empirical relationship between stock returns, return volatility and trading volume in the Brazilian stock market (Bovespa). Our sample contains stock return and trading volume data from a theoretical portfolio including stocks participating in the Bovespa Index (Ibovespa) extending from 01/03/2000 through 12/29/2005. The empirical methods used include cross-correlation analysis, unit-root tests, bivariate simultaneous equations regression analysis, GARCH and VAR models, and Granger causality tests. We find support for a contemporaneous as well as a dynamic relationship between stock returns and trading volume, implying that forecasts of one of these variables can be only slightly improved by knowledge of the other. Besides, our results indicate that contemporaneous and dynamic relationships between return volatility and trading volume also exist. Additionally, by applying Granger’s causality test, we find that return volatility contains information about upcoming trading volume and vice versa.

Suggested Citation

  • Otavio Ribeiro de Medeiros & Bernardus Ferdinandus Nazar Van Doornik, 2008. "The Empirical Relationship Between Stock Returns, Return Volatility and Trading Volume in the Brazilian Stock Market," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 5(1), pages 01-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bbz:fcpbbr:v:5:y:2008:i:1:p:01-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/download/447/676
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Bong-Soo & Rui, Oliver M., 2002. "The dynamic relationship between stock returns and trading volume: Domestic and cross-country evidence," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 51-78, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rashmi Ranjan Paital & Naresh Kumar Sharma, 2016. "Bid-Ask Spreads, Trading Volume and Return Volatility: Intraday Evidence from Indian Stock Market," Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, Eurasian Publications, vol. 4(1), pages 24-40.
    2. Bajzik, Josef, 2021. "Trading volume and stock returns: A meta-analysis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. Dumitriu, Ramona & Stefanescu, Razvan & Nistor, Costel, 2011. "Changes in the dynamic relation between the prices and the trading volume from the Bucharest stock exchange," MPRA Paper 41602, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 20 Mar 2011.
    4. Karima Saci, 2022. "Modelling the Relationship Between Trading Volume and Stock Returns Volatility for Islamic and Conventional Banks: The Case of Saudi Arabia نمذجة العلاقة بين حجم التداول وتقلب عوائد الأسهم للبنوك الإس," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 35(1), pages 41-55, January.
    5. Kerr Hatrick & Mike So & S. Chung & R. Deng, 2011. "Dynamic Relationship among Intraday Realized Volatility, Volume and Number of Trades," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 18(3), pages 291-317, September.
    6. Gurleen Sahota & Balwinder Singh, 2016. "The Empirical Investigation of Causal Relationship between Intraday Return and Volume in Indian Stock Market," Vision, , vol. 20(3), pages 199-210, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brian Sing Fan Chan & Andy Cheuk Hin Cheng & Alfred Ka Chun Ma, 2018. "Stock Market Volatility and Trading Volume: A Special Case in Hong Kong With Stock Connect Turnover," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Nicholas Apergis & Alexandros Gabrielsen & Lee Smales, 2016. "(Unusual) weather and stock returns—I am not in the mood for mood: further evidence from international markets," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 30(1), pages 63-94, February.
    3. Ben Omrane, Walid & Hussain, Syed Mujahid, 2016. "Foreign news and the structure of co-movement in European equity markets: An intraday analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 572-582.
    4. Pankaj Sinha & Shalini Agnihotri, 2016. "Investigating Impact of Volatility Persistence and Information Inflow on Volatility of Stock Indices Using Bivarite GJR-GARCH," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(5), pages 1145-1161, October.
    5. Elina Pradkhan, 2016. "Information Content of Trading Activity in Precious Metals Futures Markets," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(5), pages 421-456, May.
    6. Tazhikul Mashirova & Karlygash Tastanbekova & Murat Nurgabylov & Gulnar Lukhmanova & Kundyz Myrzabekkyzy, 2023. "Analysis of the Relationship between the Highest Price and the Trading Volume of the Energy Company Shares in Kazakhstan with Frequency Domain Causality Method," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(4), pages 22-27, July.
    7. Zhang, Wei & Bi, Zhengzheng & Shen, Dehua, 2017. "Investor structure and the price–volume relationship in a continuous double auction market: An agent-based modeling perspective," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 467(C), pages 345-355.
    8. Kausik Chaudhuri & Alok Kumar, 2015. "A Markov-Switching Model for Indian Stock Price and Volume," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 14(3), pages 239-257, December.
    9. Wang, Zijun & Qian, Yan & Wang, Shiwen, 2018. "Dynamic trading volume and stock return relation: Does it hold out of sample?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 195-210.
    10. Henryk Gurgul & Roland Mestel & Robert Syrek, 2008. "Polish Stock Market and some foreign markets - dependence analysis by copulas," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 18(2), pages 17-35.
    11. Abderrazak Dhaoui & Sami Bacha, 2017. "Investor emotional biases and trading volume’s asymmetric response: A non-linear ARDL approach tested in S&P500 stock market," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1274225-127, January.
    12. Jurich, Stephen N., 2021. "Does off-exchange trading decrease in the presence of uncertainty?," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 201-213.
    13. Cathy W.S. Chen & Mike K.P. So & Thomas C. Chiang, 2016. "Evidence of Stock Returns and Abnormal Trading Volume: A Threshold Quantile Regression Approach," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 67(1), pages 96-124, March.
    14. Hussain, Syed Mujahid, 2011. "Intraday trading volume and international spillover effects," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 183-194, June.
    15. Suk-Joong Kim, 2018. "Information Leadership in the Advanced Asia-Pacific Stock Markets: Return, Volatility and Volume Information Spillovers from the US and Japan," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Information Spillovers and Market Integration in International Finance Empirical Analyses, chapter 9, pages 271-304, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    16. Piotr Gurgul & Robert Syrek, 2013. "Testing of Dependencies between Stock Returns and Trading Volume by High Frequency Data," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 11(4 (Winter), pages 353-373.
    17. Julien Chevallier & Benoît Sévi, 2011. "On the volatility-volume relationship in energy futures markets using intraday data," Working Papers hal-04140997, HAL.
    18. Kumar, Satish, 2016. "Revisiting calendar anomalies: Three decades of multicurrency evidence," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 16-32.
    19. Marcus Alexander Ong, 2015. "An information theoretic analysis of stock returns, volatility and trading volumes," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(36), pages 3891-3906, August.
    20. Schmitt, Noemi & Westerhoff, Frank, 2014. "Speculative behavior and the dynamics of interacting stock markets," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 262-288.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bbz:fcpbbr:v:5:y:2008:i:1:p:01-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Lasso (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fucapbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.