IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bba/j00007/v3y2024i4p36-64d375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Determines the Success of Video Game Crowdfunding Campaigns? The Role of Different Success Definitions and Funding Goals

Author

Listed:
  • Nico Wille

    (Department of Economics: Chair of Money and Credit, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany)

Abstract

In the dynamic landscape of exponential growth in the games industry, crowdfunding has emerged as an important funding method for indie games. Previous research has provided inconsistent results on the factors behind its success. This study closes this gap by examining which factors influence success and how success factors vary with different definitions of success and funding goals. The results show that caution is needed when interpreting the results as they depend on model specifications even within the same dataset. Furthermore, the study proposes a framework, supported by an empirical analysis of 1,967 campaigns, to increase the probability of crowdfunding success.

Suggested Citation

  • Nico Wille, 2024. "What Determines the Success of Video Game Crowdfunding Campaigns? The Role of Different Success Definitions and Funding Goals," Financial Economics Letters, Anser Press, vol. 3(4), pages 36-64, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bba:j00007:v:3:y:2024:i:4:p:36-64:d:375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/fel/3/4/38/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/fel/3/4/38
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ford, Gary T & Smith, Darlene B & Swasy, John L, 1990. "Consumer Skepticism of Advertising Claims: Testing Hypotheses from Economics of Information," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 16(4), pages 433-441, March.
    2. Silvio Vismara, 2016. "Equity retention and social network theory in equity crowdfunding," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 579-590, April.
    3. Michael M. Gierczak & Ulrich Bretschneider & Philipp Haas & Ivo Blohm & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2016. "Crowdfunding: Outlining the New Era of Fundraising," FGF Studies in Small Business and Entrepreneurship, in: Dennis Brüntje & Oliver Gajda (ed.), Crowdfunding in Europe, edition 1, pages 7-23, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yasar, Burze & Sevilay Yılmaz, Işıl & Hatipoğlu, Nurullah & Salih, Aslıhan, 2022. "Stretching the success in reward-based crowdfunding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 205-220.
    2. Pau Sendra-Pons & Dolores Garzón & María-Ángeles Revilla-Camacho, 2024. "Catalyzing success in equity crowdfunding: trust-building strategies through signaling," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(9), pages 2699-2721, September.
    3. Jörg Prokop & Dandan Wang, 2022. "Is there a gender gap in equity-based crowdfunding?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 1219-1244, October.
    4. Douglas Cumming & Lars Hornuf & Moein Karami & Denis Schweizer, 2023. "Disentangling Crowdfunding from Fraudfunding," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(4), pages 1103-1128, February.
    5. Suresh Malodia & Alka Singh Bhatt, 2019. "Why Should I Switch Off: Understanding the Barriers to Sustainable Consumption?," Vision, , vol. 23(2), pages 134-143, June.
    6. Anton Miglo, 2020. "Crowdfunding in a Competitive Environment," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-38, February.
    7. Goethner, Maximilian & Hornuf, Lars & Regner, Tobias, 2021. "Protecting investors in equity crowdfunding: An empirical analysis of the small investor protection act," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    8. Saif Ullah & Yulin Zhou, 2020. "Gender, Anonymity and Team: What Determines Crowdfunding Success on Kickstarter," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, April.
    9. Mónika Kuti & Zsolt Bedõ & Dorottya Geiszl, 2017. "Equity-based Crowdfunding," Financial and Economic Review, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary), vol. 16(4), pages 187-200.
    10. Suwelack, Thomas & Hogreve, Jens & Hoyer, Wayne D., 2011. "Understanding Money-Back Guarantees: Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Outcomes," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 462-478.
    11. Dandan Wang & Jörg Prokop, 2025. "Gender homophily and local bias in equity crowdfunding," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 64(3), pages 805-836, March.
    12. Sophie Pommet & Alexandra Rufini & Dominique Torre, 2024. "The role of lead investors in equity crowdfunding campaigns with a secondary market," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 243-273, June.
    13. Milena Nedeljković Knežević & Marko D. Petrović & Slađana Nedeljković & Maja Mijatov & Milan M. Radovanović & Mirjana Gajić & Miroslav Škoda, 2019. "Changes in Traditional Activities of Industrial Area toward Sustainable Tourism Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Animesh Animesh & Vandana Ramachandran & Siva Viswanathan, 2005. "Quality Uncertainty And Adverse Selection In Sponsored Search Markets," Working Papers 05-27, NET Institute, revised Oct 2005.
    15. Ren, Jie & Raghupathi, Viju & Raghupathi, Wullianallur, 2021. "Exploring the subjective nature of crowdfunding decisions," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 15(C).
    16. Fisch, Christian & Masiak, Christian & Vismara, Silvio & Block, Joern, 2021. "Motives and profiles of ICO investors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 564-576.
    17. Goran Calic & Moren Lévesque & Anton Shevchenko, 2024. "On why women-owned businesses take more time to secure microloans," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 917-938, October.
    18. Md. Mukitul Hoque, 2024. "Crowdfunding for innovation: a comprehensive empirical review," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, December.
    19. H. Kent Baker & Satish Kumar & Nitesh Pandey, 2021. "Thirty years of Small Business Economics: a bibliometric overview," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 487-517, January.
    20. Sandra Correia & Miguel Sousa & Elísio Brandão, 2024. "What do we know about the choices of entrepreneurs before the equity crowdfunding campaign?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 1471-1501, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bba:j00007:v:3:y:2024:i:4:p:36-64:d:375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ramona Wang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.anserpress.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.