IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econth/y2010i2p84-98.html

The Economic Sociology of Ivan Pososhkov (1652 - 1726)

Author

Listed:
  • Nikolay Nenovsky

Abstract

Ivan Pososhkov (1652-1726) is the author of the first systematic economic treatise in Russia. His works are interesting due to three reasons at least. Firstly, it is worth-introducing some original non-European authors, who are often underestimated, in order to determine their specific features and place in the evolution of the economic and sociological thinking, and to answer the question how much the economic and social thought reflects the characteristics of the socio-economic development and to what extent it is a result of propagation of economic ideas. Secondly, such an analysis would be of benefit not only to enrich the history of the economic and social thought, but it could also contribute to the development of the theory itself, to generate new trends for analysis (such as the Pososhkov’s case of the “power-money” relation). Thirdly, even the fact alone, that Pososhkov works in a transitional period, which is difficult for Russia (the reforms made by Peter the First), he gives valuable practical ideas for the contemporary age, for the present-day situation in Russia and for the post-Soviet period.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikolay Nenovsky, 2010. "The Economic Sociology of Ivan Pososhkov (1652 - 1726)," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 84-98.
    • Handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2010:i:2:p:84-98
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ceeol.com/aspx/issuedetails.aspx?issueid=37f658e5-aa6f-48dd-89f6-3a8d0b22bcca&articleid=60a9fb53-a98d-4cb5-9524-40f1c80941ec#a60a9fb53-a98d-4cb5-9524-40f1c80941ec
    Download Restriction: Fee access
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nikolay Nenovsky, 2009. "On Money as an Institution," ICER Working Papers 12-2009, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
    2. Monroe, Arthur E., 1923. "Monetary Theory Before Adam Smith," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number monroe1923.
    3. Pamuk,Sevket, 2004. "A Monetary History of the Ottoman Empire," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521617116.
    4. repec:cup:fihrev:v:15:y:2008:i:01:p:55-72_00 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tommaso Brollo, 2019. "Money as a political institution in the commentaries of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas to Aristotle?s "Ethica Nicomachea"," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 8(2), pages 35-61.
    2. Jacques Melitz, 2019. "Some Doubts about the Economic Analysis of the Flow of Silver to China in 1550–1820," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 105-131, February.
    3. Nenovsky, Nikolay & Karpouzanov, Momtchil, 2010. "Value, Prices and Money. Comparing Marx and Menger," MPRA Paper 62040, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2012.
    4. Rosario Patalano, 2020. "Carlo Antonio Broggia, a money doctor "in adverse circumstances"," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 9(2), pages 9-37.
    5. Bertram Schefold, 2011. "Cameralism as an Intermediary between Mediterranean Scholastic Economic Thought and Classical Economics," Chapters, in: Heinz D. Kurz & Tamotsu Nishizawa & Keith Tribe (ed.), The Dissemination of Economic Ideas, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Nikolay Nenovsky & Pencho Penchev, 2016. "Money without a State: Currencies of the Orthodox Christians in the Balkan Provinces of the Ottoman Empire (17th –19th centuries)," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 29(1), pages 33-51, March.
    7. Melitz, Jacques, 1970. "The Polanyi School of Anthropology on Money: An Economist's View," MPRA Paper 84893, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 1970.
    8. Laurent Le Maux, 2014. "Cantillon And Hume On Money And Banking: The Foundations Of Two Theoretical Traditions," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 956-970, December.
    9. Ron Alquist & Benjamin Chabot, 2010. "Did adhering to the gold standard reduce the cost of capital?," Working Paper Series WP-2010-13, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    10. Nikolay Nenovsky, 2010. "The Bulgarian Economic Thought since 1989: A Personal View," ICER Working Papers 21-2010, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
    11. Eric Tymoigne, 2024. "The Origins of the Platonic Approach to Monetary Systems: Retracing European and Chinese Monetary Thoughts on Chartalism, Nominalism, and the Origins of Monetary Systems," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_1058, Levy Economics Institute.
    12. Pablo Martín-Aceña, 2018. "Money in Spain. New historical statistics. 1830-1998," Working Papers 1806, Banco de España.
    13. Tymoigne, Eric, 2024. "The Origins of the Platonic Approach to Monetary Systems: Retracing European and Chinese Monetary Thoughts on Chartalism, Nominalism, and the Origins of Monetary," MPRA Paper 124797, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Alexander Bystryakov & Nikolay Nenovsky & Elena Ponomarenko, 2019. "Monetary Innovations and Digital Economy," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 6, pages 3-18.
    15. Simon Bilo, 2018. "Lucas and Hume on Monetary Non-neutrality: A Tension between the Logic and the Technique of Economics," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 44(3), pages 364-380, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • B00 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - General - - - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches
    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2010:i:2:p:84-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.