The Ideas of Ludwig von Mises for the Development of the Austrian Economic School
Peculiarity of the theory of value of Mises is presented, and a special emphasis is put on differences with the concept of value of earlier Austrian economists. In the light of it the importance of economic calculation issues is deduced too. The theory of interventionism, developed by Mises, is presented in some details. His main conclusion, that interventionism is not an economic system which enables people to reach their goals, is pointed out. Special attention is paid to the character of economic laws. With regard to this a critical analysis of a number of statements in a book by Stefka Koeva (Austrian Economic School: Characteristics and Individual Achievements, Varna, Steno, 2003) is made.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): (2005)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 3, Aksakov Str., 1040, Sofia|
Phone: (+359 2) 810 40 18
Fax: (+359 2) 988 21 08
Web page: http://www.iki.bas.bg
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Salerno, Joseph T, 1993. "Mises and Hayek Dehomogenized: Review Essay," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 113-46.
- Emil Kauder, 1970. "Austro-Marxism vs. Austro-Marginalism," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 398-418, Fall.
- Salerno, Joseph T, 1994. "Ludwig von Mises's Monetary Theory in Light of Modern Monetary Thought," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 71-115.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2005:i:4:p:79-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Diana Dimitrova)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.