IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econst/y2019i6p74-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodical Principles of Estimation of Intellectual Leadership of the Global Economy Actors

Author

Listed:
  • Iryna Kalenyuk
  • Liudmyla Tsymbal
  • Maiia Fedyshyn

Abstract

The study of the economic aspects of leadership is a topical issue both in practical applications or management theories and in general economic science for understanding the issues of entrepreneurship, competitiveness, international economics, globalization. The phenomenon of leadership is interest in the context of determining its essence, mechanisms, role in the processes of world economic development and evaluation. The separation of this kind of leadership as an intellectual is caused by the increasing importance of human resources in general and their intellectual components, in particular, in supporting the development of a modern economy. Intellectual factors, directly or indirectly, due to the influence on other factors, are becoming key in ensuring high positions in today's highly competitive environment. Identifying the influence and role of intellectual factors in achieving leadership positions in the global economy is enabled by the analysis of the intellectual component in different approaches to determining leadership positions. Methodical approaches for estimation of the intellectual leadership of multilevel entities in the global economy are offered. The presented methodology is based on the identification of the three levels of intellectual leadership implementation: the level of resources, the level of results and the level of final results. Each of these levels is characterized by an appropriate system of indicators for different subjects, which allows them to determine their positions according to different criteria at different levels of competition. This research can be used by economists, management specialists.

Suggested Citation

  • Iryna Kalenyuk & Liudmyla Tsymbal & Maiia Fedyshyn, 2019. "Methodical Principles of Estimation of Intellectual Leadership of the Global Economy Actors," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 6, pages 74-87.
  • Handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2019:i:6:p:74-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=831394
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roman Boutellier & Oliver Gassmann & Maximilian Zedtwitz, 2008. "Managing Global Innovation," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-3-540-68952-2, June.
    2. Alan S. Blinder, 2008. "Education for the Third Industrial Revolution," Working Papers 1047, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies..
    3. Klinger, Bailey & Lederman, Daniel, 2006. "Innovation and export portfolios," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3983, The World Bank.
    4. Alan S. Blinder, 2008. "Education for the Third Industrial Revolution," Working Papers 1047, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ashok Bardhan & Daniel L. Hicks & Dwight Jaffee, 2013. "How responsive is higher education? The linkages between higher education and the labour market," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(10), pages 1239-1256, April.
    2. Petre Prisecaru, 2016. "Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Knowledge Horizons - Economics, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 8(1), pages 57-62, March.
    3. Yuzhuo Cai & Borja Ramis Ferrer & Jose Luis Martinez Lastra, 2019. "Building University-Industry Co-Innovation Networks in Transnational Innovation Ecosystems: Towards a Transdisciplinary Approach of Integrating Social Sciences and Artificial Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Richard Baldwin, 2013. "Trade and Industrialization after Globalization's Second Unbundling: How Building and Joining a Supply Chain Are Different and Why It Matters," NBER Chapters, in: Globalization in an Age of Crisis: Multilateral Economic Cooperation in the Twenty-First Century, pages 165-212, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Irina-Elena Gentimir, 2013. "The Role Of The Private Sector In Developing And Supporting International Competitiveness," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 5(2), pages 205-215.
    6. Dalila NICET- CHENAF (GREThA-GRES) & Eric ROUGIER (GREThA-GRES), 2008. "Recent exports matter: export discoveries, FDI and Growth, an empirical assessment for MENA countries," Cahiers du GRES (2002-2009) 2008-17, Groupement de Recherches Economiques et Sociales.
    7. Tiwari, Rajnish & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2011. "Role of "Lead Market" factors in globalization of innovation: Emerging evidence from India & its implications," Working Papers 64, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    8. Tiwari, Rajnish & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2011. "Lead market factors for global innovation: Emerging evidence from India," Working Papers 61, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    9. Joel Blit, 2017. "Learning remotely: R&D satellites, intra‐firm linkages, and knowledge sourcing," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 757-781, December.
    10. Jens Eschenbaecher & Falk Graser, 2011. "Managing And Optimizing Innovation Processes In Collaborative And Value Creating Networks," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(03), pages 373-391.
    11. Florian Hofmann & Melanie Jaeger‐Erben, 2020. "Organizational transition management of circular business model innovations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2770-2788, September.
    12. Inge Ivarsson & Claes Göran Alvstam, 2017. "New technology development by Swedish MNEs in emerging markets: the role of co-location of R&D and production," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(1), pages 92-116, April.
    13. Pohl, Torsten André, 2017. "Four Evangelists for leading Innovation – von Hayek, Schumpeter, Coase, von Thünen," Wittener Diskussionspapiere zu alten und neuen Fragen der Wirtschaftswissenschaft 2017-43, Witten/Herdecke University, Faculty of Management and Economics.
    14. Giuditta Prato & Daniel Nepelski, 2014. "Global technological collaboration network: network analysis of international co-inventions," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 358-375, June.
    15. Prud'homme, Dan & von Zedtwitz, Max, 2019. "Managing “forced” technology transfer in emerging markets: The case of China," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 1-1.
    16. Goya, Daniel, 2020. "The exchange rate and export variety: A cross-country analysis with long panel estimators," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 649-665.
    17. Pomykalski Andrzej, 2015. "Global business networks and technology," Management, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 46-56, May.
    18. Goya, Daniel, 2014. "Política industrial: Qué es, por qué es necesaria, y su pasado, presente y futuro en Chile [Industrial policy: What is it, why it is necessary, and its past, present and future in Chile]," MPRA Paper 64881, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Daniel Goya, 2014. "The Multiple Impacts of the Exchange Rate on Export Diversification," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1436, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    20. Giuditta De Prato & Daniel Nepelski, 2012. "Global R&D network. A network analysis of international R&D centres," JRC Research Reports JRC79478, Joint Research Centre (Seville site), revised Nov 2012.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • I25 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2019:i:6:p:74-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.