IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aip/access/v1y2020i2p157-170.html

Strategic management of healthcare institution development of the national medical services market

Author

Listed:
  • Inesa MIKHNO

    (Private Higher Educational Institution "International European University", Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Viktor KOVAL

    (Odessa Institute of Trade and Economics of Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Odessa, Ukraine)

  • Anton TERNAVSKYI

    (Institute of Market Problems and Economic and Ecological Research NAS of Ukraine, Odessa, Ukraine)

Abstract

The article reviews the current state of the market of medical services in Europe and comparatively results with the health care system in Ukraine. The main problems of reforming the health care system of Ukraine, which is characterized by the reduction of public health institutions, insufficient funding and an increase in the number of private clinics aimed at maximizing profits, are analyzed. On the one hand, this improves the quality of medical services, as private clinics, not having public funding, but financed by consumers purchase expensive equipment and make decisions in market conditions, which contributes to the introduction of new methods and innovative technologies, while on the other hand private medicine is inaccessible to the vast majority of the population of Ukraine due to the low economic status of citizens. The article considers the problem of remoteness of settlements from health care institutions and gives recommendations for further development and management of the health care system on the national market of medical services to reduce the risk of premature loss of population and improve the health of patients. The main reasons for the decline of the population of Ukraine are described and recommendations for the transition from public to public private medicine are provided. It was found that it is necessary to increase funding for public healthcare institutions and increase their total number to preserve the human potential of Ukraine. It was concluded that the strategic management of the development of the health care system should constantly monitor the effectiveness of implementation of changes, develop a flexible system of reform and control, which would take into account regional characteristics and mentality of the Ukrainian population. In order to increase the results of public medicine functioning and improve its availability and competitiveness, it is necessary to reorganize the system of control over the targeted use of monetary resources and develop a step-by-step strategy of Ukraine's development in all areas of the medical services market.

Suggested Citation

  • Inesa MIKHNO & Viktor KOVAL & Anton TERNAVSKYI, 2020. "Strategic management of healthcare institution development of the national medical services market," Access Journal, Access Press Publishing House, vol. 1(2), pages 157-170, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:aip:access:v:1:y:2020:i:2:p:157-170
    DOI: 10.46656/access.2020.1.2(7)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.access-bg.org/journalfiles/journal/issue-1-2-2020/mikhno_strategic_management_of_healthcare_institution_development.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.46656/access.2020.1.2(7)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael W-P Fortunato, 2015. "Entrepreneurship, innovation and regional development," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(5), pages 601-603, December.
    2. Andriyash, Victoria & Malikina, Oksana & Polyakova, Elena, 2019. "International Experience Of Financing Reforms In Health," Public Administration and Regional Development, Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University, issue 5, pages 474-492.
    3. Olena Baklanova & Mariana Petrova & Viktor Koval, 2020. "Institutional Transmission in Economic Development," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 68-91.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olena MAHOPETS & Tetiana KORNEEVA, 2021. "Comprehensive evaluation of labour efficiency at macro- and mesoeconomic levels in Ukraine," Access Journal, Access Press Publishing House, vol. 2(1), pages 50-77, January.
    2. Viktorija Petrov & Đorđe Ćelić & Zorica Uzelac & Zoran Drašković, 2020. "Three pillars of knowledge management in SMEs: evidence from Serbia," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 417-438, June.
    3. Giga ABUSERIDZE & Mariana PETROVA & Vitolds ZAHARS & Vladas TUMALAVICIUS, 2022. "Transformation of Georgia’s trade policy strategy: from frailty to sustainability," Access Journal, Access Press Publishing House, vol. 3(1), pages 43-52, January.
    4. Azzah Al-Maskari & Majed Al-Maskari & Mansoor Alqanoobi & Siraj Kunjumuhammed, 2019. "Internal and external obstacles facing medium and large enterprises in Rusayl Industrial Estates in the Sultanate of Oman," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Karoline S. Rogge & Elisabeth Dütschke, 2017. "Exploring Perceptions of the Credibility of Policy Mixes: The Case of German Manufacturers of Renewable Power Generation Technologies," SPRU Working Paper Series 2017-23, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    6. Aicha Dif & Benziane Abdelbaki, 2018. "Entrepreneurship within University from Intention to Incubation: The Case of Algerian Universities," International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, Professor Dr. Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, vol. 4(1), pages 15-20.
    7. Alina ZADEREI, 2020. "Ensuring the sustainability of the human resources management system of maritime industry enterprises," Access Journal, Access Press Publishing House, vol. 1(2), pages 146-156, September.
    8. Haitham Alhnaity & Ayed Almuala & Ali Kh Elmasri, 2018. "The Role of Government Intervention as a Moderating Variable in the Relationship between Entrepreneurial Networks and Business Owners’ Performance in Jordan," Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 5(1), pages 93-98.
    9. Ivars LINDE & Dmitry PHILIPPOV, 2021. "What do your customers think about? To guess or to know?," Access Journal, Access Press Publishing House, vol. 2(1), pages 17-27, January.
    10. Raluca SĂFTESCU, Elena SIMION, Cosmina PAUL, Marius MITROI, 2016. "Governance Of Smart Specialisation: Experiences Of Four European Regions," Europolity – Continuity and Change in European Governance - New Series, Department of International Relations and European Integration, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17.
    11. Kavita Surana & Anuraag Singh & Ambuj D Sagar, 2020. "Strengthening science, technology, and innovation-based incubators to help achieve Sustainable Development Goals: Lessons from India," Papers 2005.13138, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    12. Greco, Marco & Locatelli, Giorgio & Lisi, Stefano, 2017. "Open innovation in the power & energy sector: Bringing together government policies, companies’ interests, and academic essence," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 316-324.
    13. Paula Prenzel & Niels Bosma & Veronique Schutjens & Erik Stam, 2022. "Cultural diversity and innovation-oriented entrepreneurship," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2205, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Feb 2022.
    14. Herrmann, Johannes & Hjertström, Alexander & Avdeitchikova, Sofia, 2015. "The Influence of Functional and Relational Proximities on Business Angel Investments," Ratio Working Papers 253, The Ratio Institute.
    15. Maksim Belitski & Sameeksha Desai, 2016. "Creativity, entrepreneurship and economic development: city-level evidence on creativity spillover of entrepreneurship," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(6), pages 1354-1376, December.
    16. Bruno Fischer & Paola Rücker Schaeffer & Sérgio Queiroz, 2019. "High-growth entrepreneurship in a developing country: Regional systems or stochastic process?," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 64(1), pages 59-60, Enero-Mar.
    17. Oksana Sokolovska, 2020. "Directions Of Development Of Digital Society In Ukraine," Green, Blue & Digital Economy Journal, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 1(2).
    18. Pedro Varela-Vázquez & Manuel González-López & María del Carmen Sánchez-Carreira, 2019. "The uneven regional distribution of projects funded by the EU Framework Programmes," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 15(3), pages 45-72.
    19. Victoria Konovalenko Slettli, 2019. "Developing entrepreneurial mindset for transformational entrepreneurship: The case of Nordic transformative learning circles," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 15(4), pages 77-105.
    20. Birgit Leick & Susanne Gretzinger, 2018. "Brokerage and governance for business networks: a metasynthesis-based discussion," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(4), pages 773-804, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I15 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Economic Development
    • J10 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - General
    • L10 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - General
    • O43 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Institutions and Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aip:access:v:1:y:2020:i:2:p:157-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mariana Petrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://access-bg.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.