IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aif/report/v2y2020i1p32-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Society 5.0 – Its Historical Logic and Its Structural Development

Author

Listed:
  • Özgür Önday

Abstract

Despite the superior technology that produces astounding name even though many are not referred to the Industrial Revolution 4.0 alongside Japan, this year held in the world’s most comprehensive technology at CeBIT in Hannover, Germany was the partner country of the fair. Society (Society 5.0) philosophy that introduces Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, the philosophy of “Technology is not as a threat by society, should be perceived as a support.” justification by faith, he said. Japanese Federation of Economic Organizations Keidanren to prepare the 26-page manifesto of the Society 5.0 philosophy in light of the expected development economics and sociology reform intends to tell a wide audience. Said subject of study devotes to the process section is far from the birth of the first human and process until today’s society Hunting Society, Agricultural Society, Industrial Society, Information Society and Smart Society (Society 5.0) as dedicates five. If a subject is at least so far spoken but we all knew that the most critical found inside, irreversibly people at the micro level this digital conversion, and macro levels of society was subject to better prepared. Keidanren, society emphasizes that there should be cooperation in order to continue the path of the Society 5.0. The main aim of the society is to ensure the integration into society of technological developments. So instead of fearing technology and technology is intended to create a society living in a society with its cooperation they bring. The Society 5.0 was first beginning to reveal the causes of Industry 5.0 name, it is located in ensuring the integration of technology with social life. Therefore, this article proposes global solutions in-depth look at the concept of new social movements and Society 5.0 further enhanced the theoretical framework is given in the applicable knowledge and concrete work for the development of new social movements.

Suggested Citation

  • Özgür Önday, 2020. "Society 5.0 – Its Historical Logic and Its Structural Development," Journal of Scientific Reports, IJSAB International, vol. 2(1), pages 32-42.
  • Handle: RePEc:aif:report:v:2:y:2020:i:1:p:32-42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijsab.com/wp-content/uploads/1008.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ijsab.com/jsr-volume-2-issue-1/2791
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frey, Carl Benedikt & Osborne, Michael A., 2017. "The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 254-280.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. António B. Moniz & Bettina-Johanna Krings, 2016. "Robots Working with Humans or Humans Working with Robots? Searching for Social Dimensions in New Human-Robot Interaction in Industry," Societies, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Loebbing, Jonas, 2018. "An Elementary Theory of Endogenous Technical Change and Wage Inequality," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181603, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    3. Herbert Dawid & Michael Neugart, 2023. "Effects of technological change and automation on industry structure and (wage-)inequality: insights from a dynamic task-based model," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 35-63, January.
    4. Nicolaj S{o}ndergaard Muhlbach, 2021. "occ2vec: A principal approach to representing occupations using natural language processing," Papers 2111.02528, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    5. Cecily Josten & Grace Lordan, 2022. "Automation and the changing nature of work," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Costantini, Valeria & Sforna, Giorgia, 2020. "A dynamic CGE model for jointly accounting ageing population, automation and environmental tax reform. European Union as a case study," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 280-306.
    7. Martin, John P., 2017. "Policies to Expand Digital Skills for the Machine Age," IZA Policy Papers 123, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    8. Michael Koch & Ilya Manuylov & Marcel Smolka, 2021. "Robots and Firms," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(638), pages 2553-2584.
    9. Basso, Henrique S. & Jimeno, Juan F., 2021. "From secular stagnation to robocalypse? Implications of demographic and technological changes," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 833-847.
    10. Iftekhairul Islam & Fahad Shaon, 2020. "If the Prospect of Some Occupations Are Stagnating With Technological Advancement? A Task Attribute Approach to Detect Employment Vulnerability," Papers 2001.02783, arXiv.org.
    11. Rita K. Almeida & Ana M. Fernandes & Mariana Viollaz, 2017. "Does the Adoption of Complex Software Impact Employment Composition and the Skill Content of Occupations? Evidence from Chilean Firms," CEDLAS, Working Papers 0214, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    12. Jason Furman & Robert Seamans, 2019. "AI and the Economy," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 19(1), pages 161-191.
    13. Stemmler, Henry, 2019. "Does automation lead to de-industrialization in emerging economies? Evidence from Brazil," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 382, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    14. Arendt, Lukasz & Gałecka-Burdziak, Ewa & Núñez, Fernando & Pater, Robert & Usabiaga, Carlos, 2023. "Skills requirements across task-content groups in Poland: What online job offers tell us," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    15. Ayhan, Fatih & Elal, Onuray, 2023. "The IMPACTS of technological change on employment: Evidence from OECD countries with panel data analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    16. Caroline Lloyd & Jonathan Payne, 2021. "Fewer jobs, better jobs? An international comparative study of robots and ‘routine’ work in the public sector," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 109-124, March.
    17. Pietro Checcucci, 2019. "The Silver Innovation. Older workers characteristics and digitalisation of the economy," Working Papers 0040, ASTRIL - Associazione Studi e Ricerche Interdisciplinari sul Lavoro.
    18. Gilberto Santos & Jose Carlos Sá & Maria João Félix & Luís Barreto & Filipe Carvalho & Manuel Doiro & Kristína Zgodavová & Miladin Stefanović, 2021. "New Needed Quality Management Skills for Quality Managers 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    19. Golin, M. & Rauh, C., 2022. "The Impact of Fear of Automation," Janeway Institute Working Papers 2229, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    20. Moh Hosseinioun & Frank Neffke & Letian Zhang & Hyejin Youn, 2025. "Skill dependencies uncover nested human capital," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(4), pages 673-687, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aif:report:v:2:y:2020:i:1:p:32-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Farjana Rahman (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.