IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/quaest/392446.html

Planning and executing a research project using the PMBOK guide

Author

Listed:
  • Soares, Thaís de Marchi
  • Maximiano, Antonio Cesar Amaru

Abstract

The concern with the sustainability of agricultural production has encouraged the search for alternative management of soil fertility, increasing the use of by-products as filter cake. Despite some studies proved its technical viability, it is not verified the widespread used. The aim of this work was to plan and execute a research project to obtain an overview of the perception of researchers and rural producers about the use of filter cake in the fertilization of sugarcane culture, using the PMBOK guide. The planning and execution of the study project addressed two areas of knowledge in project management: scope and time. A questionnaire was made on Google Forms platform for the main stakeholders’s project (rural producers, researchers and employees in the sugar and alcohol sector). The participants understood that the search for sustainability in the sugarcane cultivation is not only a market trend, but also a strategy for their business and/or research, and that they are up-to-date on the trends in the sector in which they work and are in agreement with their aim of achieving a more sustainable production system. The main factors considered as drivers for the use of the byproduct, were also mentioned as the main obstacles for its use in agricultural (price and dependence on distributors). We concluded that the project stakeholders have a positive perception about the use of filter cake as a fertilizer in the sugarcane production. We suggest the creation of public policies to support by-products’s use since agricultural sustainability is a national interest.

Suggested Citation

  • Soares, Thaís de Marchi & Maximiano, Antonio Cesar Amaru, 2022. "Planning and executing a research project using the PMBOK guide," Quaestum, University of Sao Paulo, vol. 3.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:quaest:392446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/392446/files/562-Texto%20do%20artigo-2824-3150-10-20220322.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiang, Dong & Zhuang, Dafang & Fu, Jinying & Huang, Yaohuan & Wen, Kege, 2012. "Bioenergy potential from crop residues in China: Availability and distribution," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 1377-1382.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qin, Zhangcai & Zhuang, Qianlai & Cai, Ximing & He, Yujie & Huang, Yao & Jiang, Dong & Lin, Erda & Liu, Yaling & Tang, Ya & Wang, Michael Q., 2018. "Biomass and biofuels in China: Toward bioenergy resource potentials and their impacts on the environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2387-2400.
    2. Li, Qiang & Chen, Dingjiang & Zhu, Bing & Hu, Shanying, 2012. "Industrial straw utilization in China: Simulation and analysis of the dynamics of technology application and competition," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 207-215.
    3. Shirzad, Mohammad & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Dashti, Behrouz B. & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2019. "A comprehensive review on electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through anaerobic digestion of agricultural and livestock/slaughterhouse wastes in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 571-594.
    4. Abudi, Zaidun Naji & Hu, Zhiquan & Sun, Na & Xiao, Bo & Rajaa, Nagham & Liu, Cuixia & Guo, Dabin, 2016. "Batch anaerobic co-digestion of OFMSW (organic fraction of municipal solid waste), TWAS (thickened waste activated sludge) and RS (rice straw): Influence of TWAS and RS pretreatment and mixing ratio," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 131-140.
    5. Jiang, Zhixiang & Dai, Yanhui & Luo, Xianxiang & Liu, Guocheng & Wang, Hefang & Zheng, Hao & Wang, Zhenyu, 2017. "Assessment of bioenergy development potential and its environmental impact for rural household energy consumption: A case study in Shandong, China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1153-1161.
    6. Mohsen Jamali & Esmaeil Bakhshandeh & Mohammad Yaghoubi Khanghahi & Carmine Crecchio, 2021. "Metadata Analysis to Evaluate Environmental Impacts of Wheat Residues Burning on Soil Quality in Developing and Developed Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Ru Fang, Yan & Zhang, Silu & Zhou, Ziqiao & Shi, Wenjun & Hui Xie, Guang, 2022. "Sustainable development in China: Valuation of bioenergy potential and CO2 reduction from crop straw," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    8. Zhao, Xiqiang & Zhou, Xing & Wang, Guoxiu & Zhou, Ping & Wang, Wenlong & Song, Zhanlong, 2022. "Evaluating the effect of torrefaction on the pyrolysis of biomass and the biochar catalytic performance on dry reforming of methane," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 313-325.
    9. V. Venkatramanan & Shachi Shah & Shiv Prasad & Anoop Singh & Ram Prasad, 2021. "Assessment of Bioenergy Generation Potential of Agricultural Crop Residues in India," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 1335-1348, December.
    10. Wen, Wen & Zhang, Qin, 2015. "A design of straw acquisition mode for China's straw power plant based on supply chain coordination," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 369-374.
    11. Xinliang Xu & Ying Fu & Shuang Li, 2013. "Spatiotemporal Changes in Crop Residues with Potential for Bioenergy Use in China from 1990 to 2010," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Mengmeng Hao & Jingying Fu & Dong Jiang & Xiaoxi Yan & Shuai Chen & Fangyu Ding, 2018. "Sustainable Development of Sweet Sorghum-Based Fuel Ethanol from the Perspective of Water Resources in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, September.
    13. Famoso, F. & Prestipino, M. & Brusca, S. & Galvagno, A., 2020. "Designing sustainable bioenergy from residual biomass: Site allocation criteria and energy/exergy performance indicators," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    14. Song, Junnian & Yang, Wei & Higano, Yoshiro & Wang, Xian’en, 2015. "Dynamic integrated assessment of bioenergy technologies for energy production utilizing agricultural residues: An input–output approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 178-189.
    15. Lingling Wang & Tsunemi Watanabe, 2016. "A Stackelberg Game Theoretic Analysis of Incentive Effects under Perceived Risk for China’s Straw-Based Power Plant Supply Chain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, June.
    16. Lozano-García, Diego Fabián & Santibañez-Aguilar, José Ezequiel & Lozano, Francisco J. & Flores-Tlacuahuac, Antonio, 2020. "GIS-based modeling of residual biomass availability for energy and production in Mexico," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    17. Chitawo, Maxon L. & Chimphango, Annie F.A., 2017. "A synergetic integration of bioenergy and rice production in rice farms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 58-67.
    18. Singh, Jaswinder, 2016. "Identifying an economic power production system based on agricultural straw on regional basis in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1140-1155.
    19. Biberacher, Markus & Tum, Markus & Günther, Kurt P. & Gadocha, Sabine & Zeil, Peter & Jilani, Rehmatullah & Mansha, Muhammad, 2015. "Availability assessment of bioenergy and power plant location optimization: A case study for Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 700-711.
    20. Petra Hýsková & Štěpán Hýsek & Vilém Jarský, 2020. "The Utilization of Crop Residues as Forest Protection: Predicting the Production of Wheat and Rapeseed Residues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-10, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:quaest:392446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dauspbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.